Cookin math (theHating) Offline

26 Happily married Female from Chicago       41
         
your screen name says it all.

Angry Beaver
Angry Beaver: Here's a fun bloke for u to play with lol
royaltruthjustice
4 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating: You are the fucking MAN!
1 day ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: Im jacked, now. Ya got me jacked!
1 day ago Report
0
Angry Beaver 1 hour ago Report
0
theHating started a new conversation: Will scientists shut up now that they know everything? in Science 5 hours ago Report
2
theHating
theHating: I am ALL ABOUT truth, which is why 99% of what i say is fabricated out of a drunken stupor.
1 day ago Report Link
0
Angry Beaver 1 day ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: We should bury them in the forums
1 day ago Report
0
theHating started a new conversation: The US-Mexico border wall situation in Politics 1 day ago Report
1
theHating
theHating: Here ya go, nipples

starborncompany's Pictures
1 day ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating: In the mood!
1 day ago Report Link
0
theHating started a new conversation: Game Of Thrones Is Lame in Shows 4 days ago Report
2
theHating
theHating: Wireclub ethical standards are as follows

No democracy
No quality
Double standards for rule enforcement
No accountability

7 days ago Report Link
1
Angry Beaver 7 days ago Report
0
Angry Beaver
Angry Beaver: How ya doin mate? Keepin up the good work?
6 days ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: Moderate the voice of reason lmao
Topic: Business
7 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating: Your mom.
14 days ago Report Link
0
Angry Beaver
Angry Beaver: Dead, thank god
12 days ago Report
0
theHating 8 days ago Report
0
theHating started a new conversation: Scientology - Legit? in Science 24 days ago Report
0
theHating started a new conversation: Abortion And how pat robertson became a cuck in Politics 28 days ago Report
1
theHating
theHating has a new blog post: adverts to myself 29 days ago Report
0
View all 4 posts
theHating
theHating: its okay to spew dishonesty about evolution and climate change and the holocaust on wireclub: all major talking points of the 2016 campaign rhetoric from the alt-right fringe groups.

is it a coincidence that literally all these reactionaries showed up to wireclub after the other non-democratic platforms decided to start banning hate speech?

look at what kind of identity this website cultivates; psuedo-gambling "freemium" gaming, adult-dating themed rooms are dominant and the most visited, alt-right ideologues seem to flourish, even though outright racism is not tolerated, racism by proxy IS.

what else? anything im missing?
29 days ago Report
1
theHating
theHating: the science denialism is hardcore and very well scripted.
29 days ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: yeah, i just need a smoking gun
29 days ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: this comment violates wireclub community posting guidlines
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating: then the mods will be forced to answer the questions that i, and many other users still have.
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating: soon i will release it
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating: thats still my theory, im slowly building up evidence
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating: wc has a problem with its business philosophy: it is solving it by giving a platform to a great number of people that got kicked off other platforms for hate speech and cyberbullying
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating: the wc moderators have the thinnest skin of any chatter on their cringe platform
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating: wire IS a pipe, lined with greasy alt-right tropes.

whats up with that?
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating:




Science Conversation
Why is the climate changing. (Page 28)
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: CO2 increase is natural, not human-caused
that atmospheric CO2 increase that we observe is a product of temperature increase, and not the other way around, meaning it is a product of natural variation...it may be the Emily Litella moment for climate science and CO2 – “Never mind…” (Anthony Watts)

Simple Accounting
The easiest way to prove that the atmospheric CO2 increase is man-made is through a simple accounting approach (i.e. see Cawley 2011). The equation for the change in atmospheric CO2 (ΔCatm) is



This says that if we ‘emit’ a ton of carbon by, say, triggering a volcano then the atmosphere will gain a ton. If we ‘absorb’ a ton of carbon by growing a tree, then the atmosphere loses a ton. We can expand the equation by counting human emissions (HE) and absorption (HA) and natural emissions (NE) and absorption (NA) separately.

https://skepticalscience.com/co2-increase-is-natural-not-human-caused.htm
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: more context for the above

Ocean Acidification
The oceans are the Earth's largest carbon storage medium, so if the atmospheric CO2 increase were "natural", it would likely be coming from the oceans. But we know the CO2 increase is not coming from the oceans, because the pH of the oceans is dropping (a.k.a. ocean acidification).
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: Atmospheric O2 is Decreasing
Burning carbon requires oxygen (O2), and when we burn an atom of carbon, the required oxygen becomes part of the CO2 molecule. So if the CO2 increase is caused by burning carbon (fossil fuels), we would expect atmospheric O2 levels to decrease at the same rate. And that's indeed what we observe (Figure 1).

Cape Grim O2

Figure 1: Atmospheric Oxygen Concentration observed from Cape Grim, Tasmania

There's no reason to expect that a natural release of CO2 would have any effect on atmospheric O2 levels. On the other hand, the O2 concentration is changing exactly as we would expect from a fossil-fuel driven CO2 increase.
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: whats next?
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: henrik svensmark, ah yes
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: lets see what the community of skeptics has to say. i trust skeptics like you, ghost, over those evil scientists any day
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: It's cooling
"In fact global warming has stopped and a cooling is beginning. No climate model has predicted a cooling of the Earth – quite the contrary. And this means that the projections of future climate are unreliable." (source: Henrik Svensmark
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: When looking for evidence of global warming, there are many different indicators that we should look for. Whilst it's natural to start with air temperatures, a more thorough examination should be as inclusive as possible; snow cover, ice melt, air temperatures over land and sea, even the sea temperatures themselves. The key indicators of global warming shown below are all moving in the direction expected of a warming globe.


Indicators of a warming world based on surface, satellite, and ocean temperature measurements, satellite measurements of energy imbalance (the difference between incoming and outgoing energy at the top of the atmosphere), and of receding glaciers, sea ice, and ice sheets, rising sea level, and shifting seasons.

The question of global warming stopping is often raised in the light of a recent weather event - a big snowfall or drought breaking rain. Global warming is entirely compatible with these events; after all they are just weather. For climate change, it is the long term trends that are important; measured over decades or more, and those long term trends show that the globe is still, unfortunately, warming.

https://skepticalscience.com/global-cooling.htm
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: im so glad we are relying on 2nd information for knowledge, copy and paste is so much easier than testing a hypothesis or reading the IPCC reports at the very least.
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: i will end for now, right where we started

It's cosmic rays
"When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." (Henrik Svensmark)
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: The galactic cosmic ray (GCR) warming hypothesis is based on the premise that GCRs can "seed" clouds, and clouds reflect sunilight. So if there are fewer GCRs reaching Earth (because a strong solar magnetic field is deflecting them away), the hypothesis says there will be fewer clouds, more sunlight reaching the Earth's surface, and thus more global warming.

So more solar activity means a stronger solar magnetic field, which means fewer GCRs reaching Earth, which hypothetically means fewer clouds and more warming.

The body of scientific research has determined that GCRs are actually not very effective at seeding clouds. However, the hypothesis is also disproven just by examining the data. Over the past five decades, the number of GCRs reaching Earth has increased, and in recent years reached record high numbers. This means that if the GCR-warming hypothesis is correct, this increase in GCRs should actually be causing global cooling over the past five decades, and particularly cold temperatures in recent years.

On the contrary, while GCRs are up, global temperatures are also way up, and temperatures in recent years reached record highs.

GCR vs. Temp

Annual average GCR counts per minute (blue - note that numbers decrease going up the left vertical axis, because lower GCRs should mean higher temperatures) from the Neutron Monitor Database vs. annual average global surface temperature (red, right vertical axis) from NOAA NCDC, both with second order polynomial fits.
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: so, im still wondering, ghost, where are the ice sheets at? you guys have been saying we were gunna see them since 1970
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: but they keep melting!
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: k, wireclub mods, carry on allowing bullshit to propogate through your forums, and enjoy creeping on underaged chicks
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: wireclub = the only non-democratic platform that condones trolling for all the WRONG reasons
1 hour ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: lol, im trying very hard to hold back.

but its so hard when fundies open their laptops to post old, debunked mantras
55 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: did you know george hw bush signed a cap + trade bill on sulfer to stop acid rain?

wow, that dirty environmentalist libtard sure destroyed the economy
53 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: but do denialists admit defeat? hell no! "i refuse to read the IPCC reports because im afraid those scientists will brainwash me with their religion" is your major bullshit philosophy!
42 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: tiny coffin stocks are up by 300% this year!

AGW predicts 2019 heat records will be broken multiple times all across the globe, so keep suckin on anthony watts thumb, guys. i am getting filthy rich off of your kids's preventable and untimely deaths.
40 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: im just glad climatologists dont have to take a Hippocratic oath
39 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: hey what do y'all fringe guys always say about the powers that be? "something, something, dark side, something, something, something complete."
37 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: AGW at this point is about how much risk is palatable to you.

if you are still lost in old debunked mantras, from one skeptic to another, bring your shotgun to the gas pump, because you're gunna need it
35 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: when the resource-wars start, you guys will still be saying "god damned sun"

even though it was totally preventable

you guys probably wont live past a year.

meanwhile, the rest of the world will be running on the future energy source. its not an individual's problem to fix it, but if thats how they wanna make it, so be it.
33 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: i reckon if y'all manage to adapt and come around to believing the experts once you make a personal connection to an f-6 tornado in the rocky mountains, dont even mention my name. i dont need the "i told ya so".
30 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
smokemeblind
smokemeblind: earth is tellin ya herself
30 minutes ago • Edit • Delete • Report
Post a Reply
Page: First< Previous ... 23242526272829Next >
You are subscribed to updates for this conversation. Unfollow
Share
Science Chat Room 3 People Chatting
Similar Conversations
Can evolution and creation ever be compatible?
Evolution is a Bad Idea
Jupiter
Most atheists dont know about science
Mandela Effect
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating 29 days ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: smokemeblind: jesus christ, go restore your autonomy, wire mods
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating 29 days ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: lol, i have been moderated.
enjoy your denialist trolls and pedophilia, wire mods.
29 days ago Report Link
0
theHating
theHating has a new blog post: for your mom 1 month ago Report
1
theHating
theHating: achilles is 110% indoctrinated with the denialist psychology. he even posts long posts to make you fall asleep before you can form a rebuttle or see his idiocy. i lol at him.
1 month ago Report
1
theHating
theHating: he wants to distance himself from the "denialist" label by hiding the fact that by calling science a religion, is a strawman fallacy for one, and discrediting scientific philosophy as being rooted in subjectivity and man-made and, most important of all, ignorant of the supernatural. if you believe science is a religion, then you have to take all other religions into account as methods of ascertaining knowledge.

so now that science is on an even playing field with superstition, now they will try to argue it goes against biblical science, to promote their religion. or ideologues for climate denial always come back to the co2 and fossil fuel being benevolent and innocent. the creationists make their Christian god benevolent and innocent. and demonize the empirical observation and analysis and deeply critical thought that experts devote their lives to understanding for the benefit of human interests in which the medium we all live. its bullshit, and wireclub is too busy creepin on underaged chicks to moderate its forums.
1 month ago Report
1
More