mrbusyb Offline

What is The Formal Truth Engine?

https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=1729866730013047833#editor/target=post;postID=9120321437769976983;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=1;src=postname

The Formal Truth Engine: A rational thought process involving the comparing and contrasting of the many dogmatic dichotomies accepted today with that of a more formal and truer dichotomy. This formal dichotomy utilizes a metaphorical king at one end of a political spectrum and his inverse of a metaphorical wretch at the other end of it.

Spiritually speaking, my argument makes the claim that there exists another formal dichotomy existing between what is the holy dichotomy of Christ (the husband) and the church (the bride), with this marriage provided to us by God, and what are the more practical dogmatic dichotomies.

In other words, while it is important to understand the holy dichotomy, we need to also understand the reality that exists before us when we open our eyes.

Without much thought, reality is split dogmatically by our finite minds into many dichotomies. One such dichotomy places the color black at one end of a spectrum and that of the color white at the other. Another dogmatic dichotomy is male at one end and female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.

Opening our eyes, by utilized the Formal Truth Engine, we begin to envision a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachabe end of it. One then works out the process by comparing and contrasting this most formal of all dichotomies with all the other informal and more faulty peripheral dichotomies.

For example, to the question of what are inductive and deductive reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is while the wretch is ignorant of such processes, the king has surrounded himself with officials who understand how both of these rational truth engines function.

Again, some of the informal dichotomies accepted by us today might be Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on. The idea here is to define how these peripheral dichotomies exist mutually exclusive or a polar opposite direction of each other. One utilizes the Formal Truth Engine to juxtapose the peripheral dichotomies with that of the one true dichotomy.

In other words, I reject the left / right political spectrum. It projects the fallacy of a square linear opposite. In place of it, I insert a round 'dynamic inverse.'

What is the difference between a linear opposite and a dynamic inverse? Well, I explain this not by the process of science, but by an example of epistemology. In other words, it isn't that we don't know, but why we aren't able to perceive what already exists in plain sight. Utilize gravity as an example by thinking of it as a force pulling us straight ahead towards it. In contrast to gravity, in our finite limited minds, we would tend to envision that any potential repelling force would behave in an exact linear opposite direction. It would be pushing us away. This perception is a fallacy however.

In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the mind interprets gravity in linear fashion as a force pulling us straight ahead and forward, one should think of its inverse repelling force as pushing us away from the center in all directions towards the sides. As the repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I have referred to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."

The forces of Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is how our minds tend to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will be along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, one should persevere to develop the understanding of their relationship to more of a round dynamic inverse.