mrbusyb Offline

65 Male from Houston       38
         

Further Quirey About My New Theory

There is lots of emotion involved in the evolution debate. For example, in my last post, I submitted a "theory" called sensory devolution. A member of the forum got rather heated with my seeming lack of evidence. However, my argument is one of epistemology and how the mind has it backwards pertaining to what is truly going on. Rather than nature grow such material as legs, toes, fingers, and so on in order to perform such functions as knowledge and reproduction, I consider all these things including knowledge and reproduction to be secondary characteristics. All these secondary characteristics or abstracts, with this being the subtle factor difficult to comprehend, are created by a a process of devolution of rudimentary sense organs.

To confront Charles Darwin on this matter, I adopted a similar tactic once utilized by Galileo. Indeed, as he utilized a method developed by Plato in challenging the logic of the once mighty Aristotle -- he wrote a dialogue-- so, also in my theory, I utilized "a quirey" by Sir Isaac Newton to challenge Charles Darwin. Isaac Newton believed that the lone surroundings of infinite space existed as a sensorium of God.

Therefore, if all of infinite space is a lone sense organ, then, as one would reason, there must exist a lone dominate color for it to perceive. I decided to settle upon green serving as that dominate color because of an odd anomaly involving light. While mixing blue and yellow paint will create green paint, the combining of blue and yellow light won't create green light. In order to create green light, added manipulation of science needs to be asserted into the process.

If the universe exists as a lone sense organ, then having lots of primary colors doesn't make sense. There must exist one dominate color. The dominate color green is able to be perceived by the eye without any further alterations to the eye. A paradox, if there existed just one eye and one lone color for it to perceive, then such an eye would be blind.

In order to see further the other shades of green, other eyes (cones) have had to be constructed within the one lone eye. This construction of further eyes isn't a process of growth, but a rudimentary process of withering.

Sense organs within sense organs will wither away in the reproductive process in rudimentary fashion in order to increase the overall quality of sense organs. So, the lone primary characteristic of life, the final cause of nature so to speak, is for beings to sense themselves in greater more exponential quality.