mrbusyb Offline

Royal Correspondence / Incorporating the Query of Sensory Devolution in With the Fathering-Effect

In the last post, I pondered how the sense of smell and the sense of taste seemed to be connected. Even further, the eyes, ears, nose, and mouth all seem to be connected by a common mucus membrane. However, there isn't a common connected system of mucus membranes for the whole body. Again, according to the theory of sensory devolution, as they each have their own mucus membranes, these secondary organs of the lower body would be in a state of rudimentary devolution. In other words, the original sensorium that was envisioned by Sir Isaac Newton would have had its own mucus membrane. It would later divide and devolved further into different organic sense organs and further into other secondary characteristics such as arms, legs, eyelashes, fingernails, inorganic compounds, and so on.

So, one doesn't have an eye, but an overall sensorium. This sensorium is not part of God according to what Leibnez argued in his correspondence with Sir Isaac Newton (through disciple Clarke). However, a sensorium isn't an eye either which I believe was Sir Isaac Newton's argument. One can begin to understand this sensorium by putting back together its many parts into a whole. The sense of smell and taste would become one again. The sense of sight and sound also would become one.

I also pondered how two primary characteristics such as knowledge and reproduction can't exist together. In reducing further, which is the idea in science, one has to pick one of the two or neither. In this case, I chose the route of neither. Instead of infinite space being a brain or a sexual organ, I chose the singular organ route conceived by Sir Isaac Newton.

But this sensorium would need to be perpetual in energy. So this lone sensorium would need to be part of a heart. This is where the equation (2+0)1/2 = 1 comes into play. (2H+0S)1/2 = 1 with the variable of H (heart) equal to 2, and the S(sensorium) is equal to 0. 1/2 then oscillates both the heart and the sensorium into one universe.

From this point onward, I am going to establish sensory devolution on many levels. The first will be on the level of the gospel. indeed, in their correspondence together, both Leibnez and Sir Isaac Newton were addressing the holy scripture in the bible. The second level will be epistemology. Evolution views the origin of species both on the racist level of knowledge and on the sexist level of reproduction. Concerning sensory devolution, one views the perception of infinite space as a sensorium of both organic and inorganic material (again with this equaling 0) apart from the will of an eternal heart (this equaling 2). Finally, the third level will ponder supportive physical evidence of sensory devolution such as mucus membranes.