Science and history proves the Bible is fictional (Page 6)

BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: Should Japan have been nuked?

Those are moral phylosophical hypotetical historical discussions that NEVER will end and get solved !!!

The FACT is JAPAN was nuked twice !!!
USSR never could get a feet on the islands of Nippon !!!
1 month ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: As long as the full evidence is not available or unknown, the answer is subject to the existing evidence and subsequent hypothesis.
1 month ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: LIFE Magazine 1941 June edition, as I recall, had an article where the Supreme Court said USA should wage war on Nippon/Japan. There were many military uniform adverts and other war minded speculations about Japan.
(Edited by happensnow88)
1 month ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: NEVER MIND about that :"As long as the full evidence is not available or unknown, the answer is subject to the existing evidence and subsequent hypothesis." IT IS IRRELEVANT !!!!

WHERE ARE YOUR REFERENCES SUPPORTING YOUR CLAIMS ??????




"happensnow88: LIFE Magazine 1941 June edition, as I recall, had an article where the Supreme Court said USA should wage war on Nippon/Japan. There were many military uniform adverts and other war minded speculations about Japan."

YEAH and if that is TRUE then I am the Emperor of Nippon and the pope at the SAME TIME !!!!!

DO YOU KNOW THAT THE US SUPREME COURT IS EXCLUSIVELY BUSY WITH LAWS NOT TO BE IN CONTRADICTION WITH THE CONSTITUTION AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND HAS NO POLITICAL POWER NOR POLITICAL JUDGEMENT TO FORMULATE !!!!!!!
Don't you know the differences about the executive power, the legislative power and the judicial power and how it is distributed ???
For info:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_the_United_States

Didn't you know that Roosevelt NEEDED to ask to the the House of Representatives the declaration of war between the USA and Japan with his world famous speech about that infamous day !!!!!


MOREOVER: The political isolationist ideology was extreme strong till Dec 7th '41 !!!!




It is just a waterfall of IDIOCIES, MISINFOMATIONS AND FALSEHOODS !!!!


bs is an academical example of the D-K syndrome but you really beat him !!!
1 month ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: To be noted:

Till now the unanswered questions are:

- the definition or concept of "talmudic versions of history"
- the definition or concept of "talmudic doctrine"
- REFERENCES for the "known" pictures of Truman with a talmud under his arms in the White House etc.
- what is he factually FUCKING READING to confirm ALL his CLAIMS?
1 month ago Report
0
Corwin
Corwin: A snake talked just yesterday, and told my wife to eat an apple...
... I don't want to talk about it. It didn't end nice.
1 month ago Report
1
Corwin
Corwin: I hate it when that happens.
1 month ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider:

In what language spoke it to your wife? Arameic or Hebrew ???
1 month ago Report
0
Corwin
Corwin: I think the snake spoke Mexican.

God talked about building a wall around the garden.
1 month ago Report
0
Corwin
Corwin: And making the snake pay for it.
1 month ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: Yeah the SNAKE will CRAWL on his belly for ETERNITY

FUUUUUUUCKING HEELLLLLLLLLL, what a payment !!!!! It is true that that god has an unlimited imagination

And the wall around your garden:
is that to keep the Mexican snake inside ?
1 month ago Report
0
Corwin
Corwin: Make Eden Great Again.

Adam could have paid Eve off to just shut the hell up about that whole "apple" thing.
1 month ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider:

hush money
(Edited by BelgianStrider)
1 month ago Report
0
Corwin
Corwin: What happens in Eden, stays in Eden.
1 month ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: Are you sure about that
1 month ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: The snake in Eden was Adam.
1 month ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: the definition or concept of "talmudic versions of history"
- the definition or concept of "talmudic doctrine"
- REFERENCES for the "known" pictures of Truman with a talmud under his arms in the White House etc.
- what is he factually FUCKING READING to confirm ALL his CLAIMS?

1. The learned Elders of Zion said they were making USA into "Fortress America" to put down all opposition to Talmudic rule. Their reasoning and excuses are Talmudic History.

Talmudic Doctrine was defined by YahShua Messia as the traditions that make the Perfect Logic/law of the Creator Yauah of no effect on Earth.

It is a bit difficult to read while fucking. Try it some time. To find out what's really been happening takes a lot of digging into past events.
(Edited by happensnow88)
1 month ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: The Past is Prelude to Future.
1 month ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: Here's a little piece from the Book of Mormon, Pearl of Great Price and Doctrine and Covenants: Eve testifies that it was necessary to sin in order to get things she and Adam wanted.
Therefore, sin in necessary to get stuff. A basic Mormon doctrine, Yes or No?
(Edited by happensnow88)
1 month ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: Eve should have said, "I do not recall". Cops do the same thing.
1 month ago Report
1
happensnow88
happensnow88: As for the Supreme Court advocating war on Nippon. Simply find a library that has life magazine available for a couple years before the Pearl Harbor thing.
1 month ago Report
1
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: "...

1. The learned Elders of Zion said they were making USA into "Fortress America" to put down all opposition to Talmudic rule. Their reasoning and excuses are Talmudic History.
..."
Do you realise that you use circular reasoning and a new concept to be explained the "Talmudic rule" ???
I have some notions about the idea of a "zionic bastion in the USA", what was one of the many basic nazi propaganda lies to convince their "superior" population why the USA wanted to destroy completely Germany and that has nowadays been taken over by (mostly moslim but NOT EXCLUSIVELY) extremist anti-semite sects !!!!
OOOOPS that sounds weird and very bad for your definition and your opinions too !!!!

"...
Talmudic Doctrine was defined by YahShua Messia as the traditions that make the Perfect Logic/law of the Creator Yauah of no effect on Earth.
..."
IS COMPLETELY NONSENSE: NOBODY can make anything with that moronic definition???
What is written here: "this is a definition defined by someone else !!!!!"
It is defined by someone else: nice, but WHAT IS THE DEFINITION MORON !!!!!

"PERFECTION" DO NOT exist in this UNIVERSE: even the maths are imperfect !!!
∞/ ∞ gives us as result "unknown" hence it is clearly far from perfect !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"...the Perfect Logic/law of the Creator Yauah of no effect on Earth."
What are those (inexistent) perfect laws (with references pls) and WHY do they have no effect on Earth and what about this: do they have effect on i.e. the Universe ????
It seems to be just a big heap of illogical where indeed the "perfect logic of the Creator Yauah" will have little to no influence at all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"...
It is a bit difficult to read while fucking. Try it some time.
.."
He miserably tries to be funny: THOUGH he avoids to answer !!! WHY ??? Is he affraid to reveal his sources ?????

"...
To find out what's really been happening takes a lot of digging into past events."

Correct: hence there are Experts specialised to find the most probable events, the more documents you posses the more accurate it will be !!!
That is also why recent history is more accurate than that of i.e. "the Ancient time" !!!!




"happensnow88: As for the Supreme Court advocating war on Nippon. Simply find a library that has life magazine available for a couple years before the Pearl Harbor thing."

YOUR CLAIM: YOUR BURDEN OF PROOF
I gave clear reasons why I don't buy your opinion !!!! It is up to you to prove I am WRONG with EVIDENCE!!
Till now you never came up with any document supporting ANY of your claims !!!
NOBODY has to believe blindly "what you say because you say so" !!!!!

When I claim "airballoons" can't pass over the "von Karman line", I give EVIDENCE WHY:
- Boyle
- Archimedes
- von Karman himself
ok I give people some google work: but easy to find and why these are physical EVIDENCE !!!!
After all: people willing to learn will do the work just by curiosity !!!!
About history I mostly give the references: except trivial ones !!! (like worldnews)



"happensnow88: The snake in Eden was Adam." REFERENCES PLS: it is not because you say so, it has to be so !!!!



"happensnow88: The Past is Prelude to Future." SO WHAT ???



"happensnow88: Here's a little piece from the Book of Mormon, Pearl of Great Price and Doctrine and Covenants: Eve testifies that it was necessary to sin in order to get things she and Adam wanted.
Therefore, sin in necessary to get stuff. A basic Mormon doctrine, Yes or No?

WHAT and HOW has the mormon doctrine any influence within the tALMUD ????

Again: the use of a COMPLETE UNRELIABLE BOOK to defend the accuracy of another COMPLETE UNRELIABLE BOOK is not only circular reasoning but the pinnacle of STUPIDITY !!!!

MOREOVER: EXPLAIN us the NECESSITY of ANY RELIGION to make people aware of the concepts "sin", "good" and "evil".
Atheists are VERY AWARE of those two last concepts too and DON'T NEED a BIG BROTHER CONCEPT to BE OBLIGED TO STAY MORALLY GOOD !!!! (and factually it seems not to help much either )

SO: because I have no idea what you are speaking about and use as references COMPLETE UNRELIABLE DOCUMENTATION: my answer will be a dogmatical NO !!!!
It might be (unprobably) a mormon doctrine "it is necesary to sin to obtain what you want" but I HAVE SERIOUS DOUBTS ABOUT IT, such types of doctrines defends "lies", "theft" till "the act of murder" to get what you want !!!! AN EXTREMELY MORALLY DEFENDABLE DOCTRINE, RIGHT?
I have serious doubts that the mormons will defend such a type of doctrine: hence it is with extreme great probability THIN AIR FROM YOU !!!!


I have NO REASONS to blindly buy what you claim, FACTUALLY QUITE THE OPPOSITE !!!!
(Edited by BelgianStrider)
1 month ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: result and only rational conclusions we can have about (nothing)happensnow88's inputs :





1 month ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: NOW:
At the attentive readers discretion:
Have the questions been answered satisfactorily ????
1 month ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: pssst for anybody thinking when having notions about some ideas you have "de facto" the burden of proof:
"notions" means "based mostly on 'hearsay' and having no interest at all for any confirmations".
Hence: there is NO NEED to prove anything: it is based on hearsay or complete unconfirmed sources !!!!
"Having notions" means also having KNOWLEDGE about it but not accepting it as correct !!!!

I have notions (knowledge) of the different schools about QM: none of them have, till now, reached the undeniable level of "scientific theory" !!!!
1 month ago Report
0