Science and history proves the Bible is fictional (Page 2)

Rick Prime
Rick Prime: neither can god lol those who believe in the mythology that is god cannot prove that god exists
4 months ago Report
0
Precious Pea
4 months ago Report
0
Precious Pea
(Post deleted by Precious Pea 4 months ago)
Precious Pea
Precious Pea: You can't prove He doesnt exist
2 months ago Report
0
Rick Prime
Rick Prime: The proof that God doesn’t exist is that nobody can prove that God does exist
2 months ago Report
0
Precious Pea
Precious Pea: Lol so you say lol, quoting a bunch of man made false unbelief
(Edited by Precious Pea)
2 months ago Report
0
Rick Prime
Rick Prime: Better than a bunch of man made false mythology
2 months ago Report
0
Precious Pea
Precious Pea: No its not, but you can believe what you like, doesnt mean its false all youve done is twisted facts and provided false information. Youre welcome to your own lies lol
2 months ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: precious pea: which religion is "the only and sole true one" and pls explain also what are the reason for that ???
(Edited by BelgianStrider)
2 months ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: Probably a question that precious pea will ignore and will try to leave into oblivion !!!
2 months ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: And thus we can conclude that some very irritating questions are left unanswered by people with some type of convictions.
2 months ago Report
0
alexzuber750
alexzuber750: True
2 months ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: Most or all of the criticisms previous are based on false assumptions. On big one is the definition of "day". In Aramaic it is more akin to heat as in heat of a struggle or process. These "days" could be long periods of time.
In, Evolution HUMAN DESTINY, 1947, BY Compt du Nouy what volks call evolution is really a process of creation that eventually created mankind. He presents abundant Truth, Logic and Evidence. This book should be read for any agruements about "evolutions"
2 months ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: Yeah but the little problem is this:

- the OT dates WELLLLLL before JC, the aramaic dialect and is still a JEWISH RELIGIOUS BOOK READ in JEWISH in that time too, despite christianity accepts it !!!!
2 months ago Report
1
happensnow88
happensnow88: The "false hoods" in the Bible are often deliberate mistranslations for the most part. Get a STRONG'S Exhaustive Concordance and Dictionary of Aramaic & Greek for each word in the Bible, Mr. Strong uses Hebrew letters for the Aramaic words which are easier to read than Aramic letters.On top of that, are the stupid ideas that have been accepted by churches and their alleged Theologians.
2 months ago Report
1
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: and factually do not answer this question either:
" which religion is "the only and sole true one" and pls explain also what are the reason for that ??? "
2 months ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: "happensnow88: The "false hoods" in the Bible are often deliberate mistranslations for the most part. Get a STRONG'S Exhaustive Concordance and Dictionary of Aramaic & Greek for each word in the Bible, Mr. Strong uses Hebrew letters for the Aramaic words which are easier to read than Aramic letters.On top of that, are the stupid ideas that have been accepted by churches and their alleged Theologians."

Hence we may conclude that those books, the OT and NT, are completely unreliable
even with ANY POSSIBLE INTERPRETATIONS OF those famous 7 days
(Edited by BelgianStrider)
2 months ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: The unreliable part of the subject is that "The Bible" was written some thousands of years ago in Aramaic; And there is much symbolism. So, of course someone reading the various parts are getting more ideas from the writings than was intended, especially considering the way people think it says. Here is one example from Genesis the alleged "1st sin and first "man".
There is no definition of sin presented here. And, Adam wasn't the only "Man" on Earth. A careful reading of Genesis etc. reveals that there were other people created besides Adam. Adam was special because He was supposed to begin a race of special people that were to bless the other nations. This idea was presented to Abraham, and later to the Tribes of Israel at Mount Sinai. And they basically rejected it.
Furthermore the story of Noah is usually viewed as a destruction of the whole surface of Earth, when it was really limited to the Sons of Adam because of their race mixing . Maybe some more stuff later.
2 months ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: Nice that you tell us that probable historic fact that the OT has been translated from Jewish to Aramaic. Nice to know!

THOUGH: IT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT THE OT IS ORIGINALLY IN THE HEBREW LANGUAGE AND ACTUALLY STILL READ IN THAT LANGUAGE !!!

AND as the HEBREW LANGUAGE SEEMS TO BE THE ORIGINAL ONE, TELL US what makes the Aramaic translations more credible AND FACTUALLY: EVEN UNDENIABLY more credible than the ORIGINAL ONES !!!

Again tbh: you are seemingly digging your own pit deeper and deeper

OH !!!!! BTW I JUST DON'T LIKE YOUR INANE CONCEPT OF SPECIAL ELECTED RACE FROM ADAM! (though you are right the abrahamic deity is exclusively the deity of the Israelites: are you one of them ?????? SOOOO YOU don't belong to the ELECTED ONES - moron - )
THE ARIAN RACE WAS ALSO A DEVINE SUPRA POWERED ÜBERMENSCH !!!!!

TBH I start to have some immense dislikes about your speculations about your specific worldview about genesis, special RACE and your knowledge about SCIENCE !!!

IN SIMPLE WORDS I REALLY STARTS TO DISLIKE YOU VEHEMINGLY WITH THAT PROPOSED RACIST PHILOSOPHY BASED ON RELIGION !!!!
(Edited by BelgianStrider)
2 months ago Report
1
Rick Prime
Rick Prime: Dark, satanic mills innit, Religion?
2 months ago Report
2
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: und plötzlich "Im Westen nichts Neues" ...

The BIG SILENCES
WHY ????
(Edited by BelgianStrider)
2 months ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: A son of Shem, greatly improved Aramaic. It is the language of the Shemites and Israel too. Aramaic is still spoken in Syria. Abraham was a Syrian, and so were all the wives of Yacob.
The letter J is only about 500 years old.
As for Hebrew, it has simpler letters, but was designed as a legal language to fool the "peasants.
At anyrate, Strongs Bible Dictionary uses Hebrew and Greek letters. Much easier to read.
And for folks that like to identify as Jews, Go ahead and do so.
2 months ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: jc is a JEW, he lived in JUDEA !!!

Black on White: the abrahamic deity is the god of the Israelites !!!!

jeeeeeess man learn your own liturgy and HISTORY !!!!
IN THAT TIME MORE THAN 80% OF THE POPULATION WAS ILLITERATE!!!!
EVERYTHING YOU ARE TELLING ABOUT SIMPLER LETTERS TO BE MORE EASIER TO READ BY THE SIMPLE POPULATION IS COMPLETE 🐮

I have the infinite impression what you are now babbling is pure invented "thin air" !!!!
Where are your REFERENCES confirming your
(Edited by BelgianStrider)
2 months ago Report
0
happensnow88
happensnow88: The word Aryan comes from Iran. 10 tribes of Israel,
after they were captured by Assyria were part of Iran. Moses married the daughter of Yethro, the Priest of Media. That's all for now. Pretty involved situation.
2 months ago Report
0
BelgianStrider
BelgianStrider: Aryanism and racism
Invention of the "Aryan race"
Main articles: Aryanism and Aryan race
Origin
Racially-oriented interpretations of the Vedic Aryas as "fair-skinned foreign invaders" coming from the North led to the adoption of the term Aryan in the West as a racial category connected to a supremacist ideology known as Aryanism, which conceived the Aryan race as the "superior race" responsible for most of the achievements of ancient civilizations.[9] In 1888 Max Müller, who had himself inaugurated the racial interpretations of the Rigveda,[103] denounced talk of an "Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair" as a nonsense comparable to a linguist speaking of "a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar".[104] But an increasing number of Western writers, especially anthropologists and non-specialists influenced by Darwinist theories, came to see the Aryans as a "physical-genetic species" contrasting with the other human races – rather than as an ethnolinguistic category.[105][106] During the late-19th and early-20th centuries, noted anthropologists Theodor Poesche and Thomas Huxley quoted from the Rig Veda to suggest that the Aryans were blond and tall, with blue eyes and dolichocephalic skulls.[107][108] Western anthropologists have continued to refine this idea since the 20th century, while some have dissented.[109] Hans Heinrich Hock has questioned that the Aryans were blond or light skinned, since, in his view, "most of the [Vedic] passages may not refer to dark or light skinned people, but dark and light worlds".[110] However, according to Elena Kuzmina, there is ample evidence from the Avesta and the Rig Veda that the Aryans did have light eyes, light skin, and light hair.[111]
...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan#Aryanism_and_racism

What makes the origin of the word as an ethnocultural self-designation by Indo-Iranians in ancient times, completely irrelevant ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan#Aryanism_and_racism

NOTICE : INDO-IRANIANS not "FROM IRAN"

You need also to find any reference linking Moses to the historical reality!
Mostly ALL scholars, expert in that bronze aged shepherd's books, aka OLD TESTAMENT, came to the quite unanimous conclusion:
MOSES IS A MYTHICAL FIGURE LIKE ACHILLES !!!!
HISTORICALLY, THE EXODUS NEVER HAPPENED !!!

Still diggging your own pit deeper with your exposed inanities
2 months ago Report
0