Evolution is crap! Squawk! (Page 27)
BelgianStrider: moment, in the book he is made of dust, inorganic material.
Life coming from inorganic material is abiogenesis, with or without "goddidit"
BelgianStrider: The problem with Blackshoes is that his text is lengthy. plus the fact that most of his paragraphs are so full of fallacies that you will need nearly 5 pages to take all of them.
His latest post on the 3rd paragraph is already full contradictions about what is written in the first 2 paragraphs. when reading the third paragraph concerning that congressman.
Although the original author claimed that Prof Braterman is wrong, in all his blablating for proving Braterman is in error he in fact give evidences that Braterman just made the right analyse concerning that politician.
It is even incredible that Blackshoes publish such utterly idiotic text from professional morons.
Is he not able to analyse critically any of those lengthy contradictory blabla that he always posts???
You just read 2 or 3 paragraphs and you encountered so many contradictions that you even give up to continue to read the rest ...
Of course Zeff is the first one to approve (like) all those ridicule nonsense and give even more ridicule confirming comment.
Again I have great suspicion it has to be some banana-split thing...
Even an ID would never dare to create such idiots... (or is this the ultimate evidence there is clearly no ID, and that evolution do make some serious mishaps??? What is not excluded by ToE)
zeffur: Evolutioners can offer no truths. All of their observations are biased & bogus to fit their goofy narrative."
There is even no comment to do on that, it is full of unfounded generalizing prejudices and perjuries.
We can also clearly see the typical fallacy of vice-versa - it is often pointed out that all those so called "scientific evidences" to prove the truth of the bible are biased and fitted to those bronze aged fairy tales like variable isotopic decay i.e.
also note that zeff even has inticrate problems in semantics:
- he speaks about evolutioners in stead of evolutionists.
- he clearly do have problems to grasps that "primary" has more meanings than only "the first in the row"; he seems to have a great semantic problem to understand that primary comes from the word "primordial" what means "most important", thus primary can mean "the most important". And that a "majority using" does not mean "primary" though "most used". i.e. Even (Mandarin or Cantonese) Chinese is the most used language in the world it is for sure not the "primary" language in the world.
Although the majority of diplomats do speak English in international relations, the primary language in diplomatic relations is French as it is only the international texts in French that will be considered legal. btw a diplomat gives his "lettres de créance" to the head of state of the hosting nation.
MJ59: Their go to for "debunking" - call people names or paste pages of gibberish.
If BS wants to defend his stance, he's quite welcome to debate Prof Braterman on his Wordpress page or the Sensuous Curmudgeon site, I'm sure he'd dazzle him with his copy/paste expertise
BS can go and debate his little heart away!
Bet he doesn't
BelgianStrider: I am quite convinced Prof Braterman will start to look after hidden cameras whenever he gets confronted to the dazzling Blackshoes' copy/paste talents
MJ59: zeffur: Creationists can offer no truths. All of their observations are biased & bogus to fit their godly narrative. <----- fixed it for him
BelgianStrider: We can't deny we are doing in fact "ad hominem" attacks, but he gives us all those real opportunities, we would be stupid not using it....
kittybobo34: Interesting find recently, they were able to retrieve DNA from a bone fragment where the Mitochondrial dna was Neanderthal, the nuclear dna was homo sapien
kittybobo34: As you said we already know that there was some mixing,, this is just the first time we actually know which was the mother and father.
BelgianStrider: ok so they will know more how the direction of interbreeding was and what could produce fertile (mixed) descendances (is it that?)
kittybobo34: Can you imagine the case where the child inherits the larger size of the neanderthal brain, but gets the neurons of homosapien,, that would be one very smart half breed.
BelgianStrider: Probably, I have no clue about that, we have also to keep in mind the human "scientific" knowledge was extremely poor at that time, and with quite high certainty many "unexplicable" events were due to deities (like that Nordic guy with the hammer was responsible for that sound and light show in the sky - I know you have a secret crunch for him )
BelgianStrider: Palaeontologists start to be more convinced that Neanderthal had also some artistic abilities, thus could also use imagination and virtual concepts.
kittybobo34: I heard they were able to get some cells started using Neanderthal dna,, focusing on the neurons,, they had much fewer interconnections than Sapien neurons.
BelgianStrider: I have no idea about that, though science evolves, results:
We are getting more and more clues about Neanderthal much lesser concerning Denisova but still nothing yet concerning "Unknown" (Though they know by DNA he had existed).
We clearly can say that intermediate lifeforms are discovered by the anthropologists and palaeontologists and we are clearly the result of evolution, whatever other lunatics may say and overlook the undeniable evidences.
Palaeontologists and anthropologists are spreading pseudoscience and bias fairy tales Squawk!!!
kittybobo34: Problem is when evolution makes a jump, its usually in a very isolated place that requires some inbreeding before it becomes a common trait, The odds of finding a fossil in that situation is very remote.
BelgianStrider: indeed ... "isolation" is a proven factor for creation of two kinds in a specie and if we could live looooooooong enough we could observe that it eventually evolve to different species even. and fossilisation is a seldom event so finding the intermediates are rare. I think it is due to the search of our origins that we are able to find so many "intermediates" in the humanoid branch due to the specific search for them and knowing "where" to look. As we are not that "old" so we are finding more bones than fossils.