Evolution is crap! Squawk! (Page 13)
BelgianStrider: he smells inquisition from miles (kilometres) away
and when he is convinced you are a warlock/witch you go to the stake
BelgianStrider: lol is that the etymological source of the word steak
damn I became an antropophage that means a cannibal as I like my regular steak
This article sheds light into the methodologically fallacious foundation of evolution. Our main focus is not to refute a specific example of what Evolutionists consider to be evidence. Instead we question the fundamental basis of evolutionary theory as a whole. But in order to do that, we first must define the two categories of scientific observation.
BelgianStrider: In that article he just switched the logic pre-emptive...
"If evolution is true then we have to observe event X"
it is just the opposite
"if we can observe event X, then we can assume the theory is not false"
We did observe event X
So the theory seems not to be false.
That is also how Einstein's theory have been not false.
There have been predictions, thus if we can observe event E that the theory preconise, that makes the theory quite surely valid.
Event E has been observed years later...
making Einstein's Theory quite valid.
Dangerous and vey malicious way of biasing logics
Evo is fake