Should we Believe what AchillesSinatra says LOL Precious Pea: UHU lazy ass mispelling of uh huh, mostly used by the same retards and airheads who use lolz, kewl,wtf, teh, omg, dood, every other sentence while chatting. AchillesSinatra: Retards and airheads? You've come to the right place: Welcome to the Wireclub science forums (Post deleted by Precious Pea ) AchillesSinatra: You don't need to worry then. Now, what topics that you know absolutely nothing about do you intend to lecture on today, professor? zeffur: zeffur: Re: "Pascal's Wager is a fallacy. Change my mind." No, Pascal's wager is not a fallacy. A fallacy is: 1. a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument. 2. a failure in reasoning which renders an argument invalid. 3. faulty reasoning; misleading or unsound argument. Pascal's wager is valid & therefore not a mistaken belief that is based on unsound reasoning or argument, if the following conditions are met: 1. There is only one possible God that can or can't exist. 2. You loose nothing by believing in God, but can gain everything by doing so--meaning that it is 100% certain that you go to heaven, if you believe in God. What is God really asking of you?? To have faith that He exists, that He is always right/true/perfect, & to be/do what is right/true/good for yourself & for others as you wish--vs the possible alternatives... What kind of dummy would value rejecting a true & loving God & eternal life with other people who are wise enough to choose what is right/true/good over what is wrong/untrue/bad/evil?? It's like being offered 2 plates to eat from. One plate has good delicious food on it & the other has manure on it. You're free to decide which plate you will eat from--what kind of dummy would choose the manure?? zeffur: re: "Is Creationism is a mental illness"? Only if you are an evolutioner who is mentally incapable of deductively processing all of the available information & arriving at the sound conclusion that life could only come into existence via the application of intelligence by a Creator--since there is virtually no reasonable possibility that nature could have created life without such an intelligent Creator. (Edited by zeffur) AchillesSinatra: Why are you posting on Pascal's wager in every thread? Have you written to Santa Claus about it yet? | Science Chat Room 2 People Chatting Similar Conversations |