science denialism (Page 3) (Post deleted by Kekraptico )  (Post deleted by Kekraptico ) (Post deleted by Kekraptico ) (Post deleted by Kekraptico ) (Post deleted by Kekraptico )  theHating: Lmao "I will delete anything you post in the true spirit of being a grown ass man with feelings" Wahwahwahwah (Post deleted by Kekraptico ) Angry Beaver: I'll repeat this here....just in case Relativity is a falsifiable theory: It makes predictions that can be tested by experiment. In the case of special relativity, these include the principle of relativity, the constancy of the speed of light, and time dilation. The predictions of special relativity have been confirmed in numerous tests since Einstein published his paper in 1905, but three experiments conducted between 1881 and 1938 were critical to its validation. These are the Michelson–Morley experiment, the Kennedy–Thorndike experiment, and the Ives–Stilwell experiment. Einstein derived the Lorentz transformations from first principles in 1905, but these three experiments allow the transformations to be induced from experimental evidence. Those classic experiments have been repeated many times with increased precision. Other experiments include, for instance, relativistic energy and momentum increase at high velocities, experimental testing of time dilation, and modern searches for Lorentz violations. Modern applications: Far from being simply of theoretical interest, relativitistic effects are important practical engineering concerns. Satellite-based measurement needs to take into account relativistic effects, as each satellite is in motion relative to an Earth-bound user and is thus in a different frame of reference under the theory of relativity. Global positioning systems such as GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo, must account for all of the relativistic effects, such as the consequences of Earth's gravitational field, in order to work with precision. This is also the case in the high-precision measurement of time. Instruments ranging from electron microscopes to particle accelerators would not work if relativistic considerations were omitted. Seems legit to me. Please tell me what evidence you have to disprove : Michelson–Morley experiment, the Kennedy–Thorndike experiment, and the Ives–Stilwell experiment. ?? And please don't say "the zionists" PS: Stephen Hawking greatly admired Einstein, I'd value his opinion over yours tbh Have a nice day! ( (Post deleted by Kekraptico ) Angry Beaver: "Those classic experiments have been repeated many times with increased precision."  Present YOUR credentials... (Edited by Angry Beaver) (Post deleted by Kekraptico ) Angry Beaver: "Relativity is a falsifiable theory: It makes predictions that can be tested by experiment." Your credentials are? Angry Beaver: How was Einstein's theory of general relativity proved? Arthur Stanley Eddington's 1919 expedition confirmed Einstein's prediction for the deflection of light by the Sun during the total solar eclipse of 29 May 1919 which helped to cement the status of general relativity as a true theory. Since then many observations have confirmed the correctness of general relativity. Angry Beaver: Basically, your premise that Einstein's theories are BS, is because he is Jewish? Yer a sad little twat ain't ya? Here's a nice new term I coined..... *cultural bigot* feel free to call yourself one! Why wire doesn't shut you people down, I don't know.... apparently hate speech is ok here Well at least you are faithful to your nickname I suppose (Edited by Angry Beaver) Angry Beaver: Feel free to delete whatever you need to kep! Pretty sure this is blackie and zeff's love child lol (Edited by Angry Beaver) (Post deleted by Kekraptico ) (Post deleted by Kekraptico ) (Post deleted by Kekraptico ) | Science Chat Room 1 Person Chatting Similar Conversations |
