Falsifiability? Let's not be Naive. (Page 6) AchillesSinatra: Oh, I'll be seeing my lemurs again soon. Back to Madagascar next month These things are adorable AchillesSinatra: I don't have a problem with assumptions. What I DO have a problem with is a vacuous tautology masquerading as an empirical hypothesis. Angry Beaver: Fitness doesn't mean as much in the human sphere as, due to medical science, a totally unfit, underweight, toothless crackhead can still live and spawn his little family payment kiddies by intervention, in Darwin's world such intervention would not have been there, bastard would have died IE: unfit (Edited by Angry Beaver) Angry Beaver: Not if he was a lifelong doper and crackhead having an overdose with no paramedics nearby AchillesSinatra: The fit are, by definition, those who survive and reproduce successfully. If you're old, ugly, fat, bald, and can't carry a tune (like me) but get laid more than Johnny Depp, then you are BY DEFINITION fit. AchillesSinatra: I used to have an entire thread on the topic of "biological fitness" back when I was Colin. You'll find it in the science forum archives.... covered in dust. AchillesSinatra: "Say, colin, whats fit, naturally selective, and full of holes?" Your sexy neglige? | Science Chat Room 2 People Chatting Similar Conversations |