Join Now! Log In Chat Rooms Forums Find People Places

Why is the climate changing. (Page 205)

GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: You have got to be kidding me ! You still don’t get it. You can’t see the forest for the trees. In regards to some things, whether it’s a Greenie myth or a myth that certain authors name of myths is known, you are extremely gullible and way too easily misled. The other point is that it would have been better to have started your sentence with the word your rather than stupidly used and at the front, it’s a bad habit of yours. If your sentence was for example about the owner of a company had toxic chemicals in his factory and exploited workers then the sentence would start of as ‘The owner of the company had toxic chemicals in his factory and exploited workers’, it would not start off as ‘And the owner of the company had toxic chemicals in his factory and exploited workers’ at all. I bet you have never gone up to people and started a conversation with the word and at the front of it. You may have never even used the word and starting off any sentence with the and and most people haven’t so don’t think that on this site you should do the direct opposite of what you do when you talk to anyone. I prefer to have a space before a question mark.

Challenge your thoughts and question what you think is true, at the moment you like many others who are misled have gone for biased information and think that what has been presented to you is true. In the case of this forum your religious like way of thinking has you in a conspiracy theory science cult based on dodgy doomsday science. One day we’ll after even the great great grandchildren of even those who have just been born are dead the planet may warm naturally at some stage, it happened naturally in the past before we were alive. There is no man made global warming going on right now. I’ll worried that if you get any worse then you will join the Extinction Rebellion idiots and glue yourself to the road or a train.
1 year ago Report
0
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: By the way in some places the climate has changed in one way or the other while we have been alive and in other places it has not. Climate change does not mean by default that global warming is happening naturally or because of Humans. Without the gas that you are so against, yet it gets converted, you, myself and every other life form that depends on carbon dioxide being converted would be dead right now.
1 year ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: So you're getting hot under the collar because of the, to you, naughty way I used a single word? Really, Gerald, you need to get a life.
1 year ago Report
0
GeraldTheGnumbnut
GeraldTheGnumbnut: And the world keeps turning. Lol
1 year ago Report
1
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: I have a life so do not be a jerk. I am not hot under the collar, lately I have been trying to keep warm. You didn't use a single word, so it is not about a single word. Be more mindful of what you come out with in the future. You are a fan of doomsday science, paranoid hypocrite, it is you who should get a proper life rather than just being rude for the sake of it because I don't agree with your conspiracy theory. The word keeps turning, at no stage was there a need for anyone to use the word and at the front of a sentence, especially not when the sentence makes sense without it rather than with it. We are not using mobile phones here, that means that all of us, including the multiple account using Harry Haggis, can use words instead of letters.

Regardless of what you both childishly want to go on about I still prefer to use a space before a question mark. Global warming is not happening. One on here was completely off the subject of this ridiculous forum and therefore he was a Troll once again.
1 year ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: Mmm, right, so global warming isn't happening, even though we rarely see much snow in the wintertime nowadays in the UK, unlike decades ago? Got to say it: Gerald has been living underground for too long. He needs to dig his way out of his mountain hideout and take a look around.
1 year ago Report
1
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: Your little spot in the world is not an indicator of everywhere panic merchant and pessimist. Nowadays ? You have been watched too many North American videos. Well people like yourself are in the minority, since your so brainwashed you should join the Greta Thunberg fan club. I’m surprised that she isn’t in a nuthouse, she is insane after all. You haven’t proven a thing fool, it’s like you are doing Bob’s I know what I know bit. Some doomsday scientists delivered a conspiracy theory, you noticed or maybe imagined some unusual activity climate wise and so you, old man Ghostgeek, have decided that it must be global warming that’s going on. Wait though, in your faulty mind it’s not only global warming, it’s man made global warming. You are extremely gullible, they saw you coming from a mile away.

I have not been living under any rock and I do not live underground. Quite the opposite, I’m on the third floor of my house. We ? If snow ever did happen where I am then things would be really out of whack, I live where it’s subtropical. Then again are you a Pom ? A lot of Poms love to whinge about the weather. There is no need for commas at times, mmm is not a word and I prefer to to have a space before a question mark or colon, if there should even be a colon. You didn’t need one in other words. You literally have said nothing to me so far on this text based site. Go and glue yourself to a train or to the road like the extinction rebellion idiots do and then get arrested over it. Maybe the headline on the front of the newspaper will be ‘Senile old man glues himself to a train. You might even burn to a crisp here in minutes in summer. I though am half Irish so I burn as easily as I tan.
1 year ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: So many angry words. It's like a tirade from a six year old who's been told that the insect they've been calling a wasp is actually a bee.
1 year ago Report
0
GeraldTheGnumbnut
GeraldTheGnumbnut: Hey Gerald, nobody cares.
1 year ago Report
1
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: If nobody cares then you both wouldn’t have replied. You both proved otherwise by doing so.

Now to Ghostgeek. It’s not like a tirade from a six year old except for what yourself put on here. You just don’t like people disagreeing with your conspiracy theory. Maybe you can join Lori with her Illuminati beliefs, her psychic silliness, her remote viewing rubbish and so on. It is actually you Ghostgeek who cannot work out what is actually so., not me. It’s obvious in some other forums too. They were not angry words, it was just me pointing out where you stuffed up. Why don’t you both try to have something that is actually about the subject and that is actually true or at least possible ? That would be new for both of you.
1 year ago Report
0
GeraldTheGnumbnut
GeraldTheGnumbnut: Nobody cares about your pedantic grammar rules, which are generally wrong.
1 year ago Report
1
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: You just a Troll and you should have been booted off this site long ago. North American wise they are generally wrong fool. There really is no reason for you to have even used a comma just then. Another thing. if you didn't care then you would not have replied at all. Also there are words that are better suited words than one of the ones that you just picked. You are completely off the subject as per usual. This forum is obviously about what the climate is like. This forum is not about your personal grudge against me. I still remember some of your psychopathic moments in the past. Just go and hang out with some politically correct fools where you can tell them whatever you want. I mean you at times live in various places all at once and have a different age each time. Goodbye Angry Beaver, Harry Haggis and whatever extra names and accounts you have on here at the moment.
(Edited by GeraldtheGnome)
1 year ago Report
0
GeraldTheGnumbnut
GeraldTheGnumbnut: I actually have zero care about you and your lunatic ramblings.
The only psycho here is you my friend.
I have only ever had the one account with name changes.
Not that it's any of your business.


My father in law was an English/History Master, with a Masters Degree in Literature.
He had no problem with my use of the English language, but he'd have a conniption over yours.

Stop telling everyone how to write, you are wrong.
Just because you don't understand words of more than two syllables doesn't mean they are incorrect. Most people use the ones you disapprove of.


As a famous author once wrote, go fuck yourself, idiot.


Every thread in which you have posted, you have been immediately off topic as soon as you typed:

"Mistakes were made" unless they were threads about English and Grammar.

You, yourself are nothing more than a boorish little troll.
(Edited by GeraldTheGnumbnut)
1 year ago Report
1
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: If the Troll who probably still has multiple accounts with a different age and a different location with each account did not care five hours ago then he would not have bothered sending me a message that was nothing more than just him bullying me. He is not his father in law and at no stage was there any need for the false accusations and insults. The swearing was not needed. Each sentence does not have to be on another line either. The only one who did any lunatic ramblings and psychotic activity was that hypocrite. He has lied about things on more than one occasion and he was off topic just then. I have with each message been at least partially on the topic of the forum. He cannot claim that about himself on various forums on here.

I have never told him how to write, that means he is wrong about that. There is no need for swearing, he should be banned for life from this site or at least for quite a while. I am not an idiot. The problem is not with that of his English language or at least I do not think that it is. Most people do not use what he thinks that I disapprove of. I do not use the internet use of the words thread and posted, if others do then so be it for I do not have to.

Sure, I can use some Latin expressions if I so wish to even though there is no need for me to do that. Mistakes were made by the one who decided to be completely off the topic of this forum. Sometimes there really is no reason for quotation marks. I understand words with more than two syllables, to claim otherwise is either a lie or something that is believed by the angry one to be true when it is not. I have not been immediately off the topic on each forum, there is no need for anyone to lie or to jump to conclusions. No author once wrote what I saw above this. I prefer to use a space before a colon, that is of course when one is actually needed. He certainly could have used some better suited words.

Now actually to the subject that the above one diverted me from. If a climate has changed then be aware of how it has changed rather than just assume that it has changed in the way that you think it has. No one can control the climate and no one can even really change the weather. When the climate is not the way it has been for a while anywhere then no one should assume that it is caused by anyone and no one should think that together people can change the climate. The planet is not just going to become climate controlled by even every person on the planet. Everyone should just get on with life instead of fearing the worst. There is no reason for anyone to be pessimistic or optimistic about anything that just needs a realistic way of thinking.

Why should concerned people worry about something that they have not proven at all ?
1 year ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: Although scientists have warned of possible social perils resulting from climate change, the impacts of long-term climate change on social unrest and population collapse have not been quantitatively investigated. In this study, high-resolution paleo-climatic data have been used to explore at a macroscale the effects of climate change on the outbreak of war and population decline in the preindustrial era. We show that long-term fluctuations of war frequency and population changes followed the cycles of temperature change. Further analyses show that cooling impeded agricultural production, which brought about a series of serious social problems, including price inflation, then successively war outbreak, famine, and population decline successively. The findings suggest that worldwide and synchronistic war–peace, population, and price cycles in recent centuries have been driven mainly by long-term climate change. The findings also imply that social mechanisms that might mitigate the impact of climate change were not significantly effective during the study period. Climate change may thus have played a more important role and imposed a wider ranging effect on human civilization than has so far been suggested. Findings of this research may lend an additional dimension to the classic concepts of Malthusianism and Darwinism.

[ https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0703073104 ]
1 year ago Report
1
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: You have failed to see it like others have failed to see it. It’s not about how many syllables a word has or if it’s a big word or a small word, it’s about what word or words are the best ones to use rather than what words are thought to be the best words to use. For example the words with ism at the end of them from that blog really amounted to nothing. In fact that whole entire sentence was not needed at all, the one who made that article thought that it made him or her smart. The problem is that it showed that person to be dumb. Despite any previous false accusations on here about me it is a case that I do know the words that have been used and at times just shown on this site. Sometimes people just use certain words to impress others yet end up doing the opposite.

Climate change can be a change of any sort, it does not mean by default that of any once real global warming or even that of any imagined present global warming or both. If you go into things with the belief that climate change only means that of global warming then you have shown yourself to have confirmation bias and bias of a religious kind of manner. The blog you showed was biased because false claims were made. When someone mentions that scientists have warned us of anything then by default it means that all scientists agree with that claim.

Have all scientists warned even one person about what was claimed in the article ? Of course not. You though only look at one side of things as does the hypocrite who left here with in an almighty rage after falsely accusing me of being in a rage. I though do not have a tendency to swallow the dictionary and only go for three or more syllables with a word or just that of certain big words when it is better to do so. Even the dumbest of people can use a heap of syllables or a big word that they found to further a point about the climate or any other subject and know very little or nothing of what the word means. If something is claimed to be impossible then you just state that something is impossible without adding another word.

Large scale rather than macroscale is better, I am even being told right now that macroscale is a spelling mistake. High resolution rather than high-resolution. If you do not agree with me about that then let us just agree to disagree. The thing is that a climate can change in many ways in one area or more, it maybe a case where it has become wetter or drier or cooler or warmer or hotter or colder or a mixture of any of those things. Any of those things make a difference to everything. No one though should think that we can control a climate no matter what is really happening in that person’s area. Do not think for one second that any warming that is occurring anywhere right now is happening globally. The blogger of the opinion piece article liked to use hyphens a little too much and thought that certain words actually amounted to something meaningful when they did not. I can use istic onto the end of a completely useless word too but I will not do so because I only like to use it when it is needed.
1 year ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: I agree to disagree with you, Gerald, so please leave us lesser mortals in peace.
1 year ago Report
0
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: We are all equal mortals, peace is a myth, things can be calm and tranquil. Challenge your own thoughts and question what you think. Leave it at that. It's all that is important after all.
1 year ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: Today's climate change news.. Tons of dead fish are coming ashore in Texas, seems the water temps have reached a point where oxygen can't get past the thermal layer . Ocean temps average world wide is up 2 tenths of a degree, that is the top 2 kilometers of water. Canada predicts they will be fighting forest fires all summer.
1 year ago Report
0
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: Ocean temperatures worldwide my arse.
1 year ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: Yes, dead fish washed up but by the sound of it it's not so unusual in the summer:

“Fish kills like this are common in the summer when temperatures increase,” according to a statement shared on the Quintana Beach County Park Facebook page. “If there isn’t enough oxygen in the water, fish can’t ‘breathe.’ Low dissolved oxygen in many cases is a natural occurrence.”

[ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-thousands-of-dead-fish-washed-ashore-in-texas-180982373/ ]

Of course, there could be a silver lining to this sad tale:

Though the massive die-off has caused some temporary unpleasantness for beachgoers, it also likely contributed a “huge nutrient pulse into our environment,” as Katie St. Clair, sea life facility manager at Texas A&M University at Galveston, tells NPR’s Juliana Kim. Many of the fish washed up on shore as “shredded skeletons,” per a Facebook post from Quintana Beach County Park, meaning their flesh got eaten or was left to decompose in the water.

[ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-thousands-of-dead-fish-washed-ashore-in-texas-180982373/ ]
1 year ago Report
0
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: The news here yesterday had that the minimum around this way was colder than Iceland was colder than Iceland was yesterday.
1 year ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: Iceland has the gulf stream to keep it warm, and as it's now summer I suppose it could be a little warmer than where you live, Gerald.
1 year ago Report
0
GeraldtheGnome
GeraldtheGnome: I did mention on the day, considering the average temperature each year in Brisbane in Winter is far warmer than any Winter day in Iceland and most likely where you are, where if I remember when I visited your way was when I was there like mid winter during your mid summer at the time, I was never trying to claim it was colder than a winter in Iceland. I did also mention minimum only because the maximum was the maximum average on the day. I get that sometimes people get a part of something about weather during a day and think that it was like that for the entire day. That by the way was not my intention, so do not think that I was misleading anyone if you thought. I was not. I don’t know if you did think that but I wanted to make it clear that I wasn’t doing that. Sometimes though commas are not necessary.
1 year ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: The thing is when talking about climate, you have to average the world temps, any one place could be warmer or colder, thats just weather.
1 year ago Report
0