Creationism is a mental illness (Page 223)  BelgianStrider:  The only that contradicts everyone on evey subject is clearly Z. Everyone who is rational, intelligent, decent and properly educated DO see how dumb, uneducated, dishonest, irrational and a totally illogical liar Z is. BelgianStrider: "Nicotina: Awwwww... you’re so cute zeff, with your constant need to be on your knees worshipping a stronger man than you are. Cute!" Z's reply "zeffur zeffur: I suppose given that you are a heathen female you think being an expert in that position qualifies you to make such an off color joke, huh? 2 days ago " Now this : " zeffur: That "BSr: I am not "properly educated"..." was an obvious joke, numbnuts. sheesh... (Edited by zeffur) 7 minutes ago • Report" It has to be considered as joke, when it comes only from Z ? "Oneway tickets" of that kind, seem not to be appreciated very much. We can reply to Z's joke likewise: "Supposing and given that you are a theist male you think being an expert in "properly education" qualifies you to make such an off color joke, huh" (Edited by BelgianStrider) zeffur: And you left out Nicotina's insult why exactly? Because you aren't & honest & fair person... BelgianStrider: Z should stop to assume what he definitively can not know. He can not know on which side Zanjan is considering herself ! Nicotina, insulting ? How can anyone being insulting when that person just mentions real facts ? Whenever Z is getting out of arguments, he always goes over to clear "ad hominem" and "ad personam" attacks. His last 4 reactions again gives confirmation about the taken observations: "zeffur: And you left out Nicotina's insult why exactly? Because you aren't & honest & fair person... 14 minutes ago • Report zeffur zeffur: Nicotina rarely adds anything to the dialog other than dumb mocking & false info... 13 minutes ago zeffur zeffur: The only people who disagree with my points are dishonest & irrational people--mostly atheists & other nitwits... (Edited by zeffur) 12 minutes ago zeffur zeffur: Zanjan is the only exception & she's just in imaginary lala land with her ridiculous comments--which is why she seems to you to side with your pack of unwise, dumb, & delusional pack of jackals." That, probably, also must belong to "properly education" and "properly well behaviour" (Edited by BelgianStrider)  AretoNyx: None of it means anything to you zeff but you sure talk much on such. If trying to insult others because it means nothing for whatever feels ...you can pray on that. Wasting time I guess is a hobby for some and I guess you enjoy it. Have a good day. 😉 AretoNyx: One could better themselves but hating or insulting on others with different views is so much easier I guess. Does a bible say to do that? Lol BelgianStrider: "zeffur: Once again you don't understand English well enough to understand properly." One of the best "ad hominem" argumentation, (we even might it classify as an "ad personam" attack - as eveyone knows English is not my mothertongue) Though: Evidences shows clearly I can read an understand quite well and it seems also am quite able express decently my thoughts in the Shakespearean language. Facts did reveal us that learning a(n "alien" language has not been part in the "proper education" of Z. Notice the difference of reasoning and argumentation. Facts just show us that we can have questions concerning Z's "views" of "proper education". "Anyway--arguing with you is like nailing jello to a wall--a waste of time...an express decently Believe whatever rubbish that you want to believe--none of it is worth anything..." (Edited by zeffur) This part here has no validity, neither any sense; First of all; what Z calls "argumentation" are just "ad hominem arguments", what are in fact no arguments at all, just clear fallacies in logic ( factual false too - thus even can be classified as a clear lie -). Secondly ; if the rubbish belief is not worth anything, why spent time and effort to react on that ? I do have some reasons to react on Z's "input". The reasons are: - Z's input is falacious by the fact it is a clear "ad personam" attack. - Z's input is a lie (what makes Z a dishonest liar ). - Z's input claiming he can "argue" is quite false too, as he demonstrated in his first paragraph. - Z's input is quite illogical and contradictory in reasoning versus behaving. (Edited by BelgianStrider) BelgianStrider: "AretoNyx: None of it means anything to you zeff but you sure talk much on such. If trying to insult others because it means nothing for whatever feels ...you can pray on that. Wasting time I guess is a hobby for some and I guess you enjoy it. Have a good day. 😉 5 hours ago • Report1 AretoNyx AretoNyx: One could better themselves but hating or insulting on others with different views is so much easier I guess. Does a bible say to do that? Lol"  zeffur: re: "Though: Evidences shows clearly I can read an understand quite well and it seems also am quite able express decently my thoughts in the Shakespearean language." BelgianStrider: Ow; surely again one of Z's "off color jokes". That "zeffur: re: "Though: Evidences shows clearly I can read an understand quite well and it seems also am quite able express decently my thoughts in the Shakespearean language." was an obvious joke, numbnuts. sheesh.. So no wories folks. BUT: Z can NOT refrain himself , Z needs to use "ad personam" attacks (especially to those that are being an eyesore to his idiot opinions) I guess we will have to get used with that  BelgianStrider: "zeffur zeffur: Prove anything that I have lied about." Ow, there is not many problems for that: Here is already one BelgianStrider: "zeffur: Once again you don't understand English well enough to understand properly." One of the best "ad hominem" argumentation, (we even might it classify as an "ad personam" attack - as eveyone knows English is not my mothertongue) Though: Evidences shows clearly I can read an understand quite well and it seems also am quite able express decently my thoughts in the Shakespearean language. Facts did reveal us that learning a(n "alien" ) language has not been part in the "proper education" of Z. Notice the difference of reasoning and argumentation. Facts just show us that we can have questions concerning Z's "views" of "proper education". "Anyway--arguing with you is like nailing jello to a wall--a waste of time...an express decently Believe whatever rubbish that you want to believe--none of it is worth anything..." (Edited by zeffur) This part here has no validity, neither any sense; First of all; what Z calls "argumentation" are just "ad hominem arguments", what are in fact no arguments at all, just clear fallacies in logic ( factual false too - thus even can be classified as a clear lie -). Secondly ; if the rubbish belief is not worth anything, why spent time and effort to react on that ? I do have some reasons to react on Z's "input". The reasons are: - Z's input is falacious by the fact it is a clear "ad personam" attack. - Z's input is a lie (what makes Z a dishonest liar ). - Z's input claiming he can "argue" is quite false too, as he demonstrated in his first paragraph. - Z's input is quite illogical and contradictory in reasoning versus behaving." "First of all; what Z calls "argumentation" are just "ad hominem arguments", what are in fact no arguments at all, just clear fallacies in logic ( factual false too - thus even can be classified as a clear lie -)." Oops, we have already here a clear evidence of a claim not stroking the reality, and how it has been represented it can be cataloged as a confirmed lie. (Edited by BelgianStrider) BelgianStrider: Evidences given, proof presented. Easy, isn't it ? If Z needs more confirmation, I am sure I am not the only one willing to give Z more evidences of that fact: Z is a pathological totally dishonest liar. (Edited by BelgianStrider) zeffur: re: "BSr: "zeffur: "BSr: Though: Evidences shows clearly I can read an understand quite well and it seems also am quite able express decently my thoughts in the Shakespearean language." was an obvious joke, numbnuts. sheesh.. So no wories folks. Z can NOT refrain himself , Z needs to use "ad personam" attacks (especially to those that are being an eyesore to his idiot opinions)" You are delusional. Your English is bad & you are apparently oblivious about just how bad it is... It's truly amazing the level of arrogance & ignorance you atheist evo chumps possess. Here's the corrected version of what you should have posted if you were actually competently fluent in English: "The evidence clearly shows that I can read and understand English quite well, and it seems that I am also quite able to express my thoughts well in English." "So, no worries, folks." You are not fluent in English & you definitely are not able to understand it properly either--you just arrogantly delude yourself that you are fluent in English. Can English speakers properly decipher what you post? Not always. You often times are incoherent & you have a habit of falsely believing things are 'contradictions' when they are not. So, yeah, those ^^ are just a few of your many struggles in life... Frankly, I understand your messages far better when you post them in French as even Google translation does a better job of producing English than you can... (Edited by zeffur) zeffur: re: ""zeffur: Once again you don't understand English well enough to understand properly."" That ^^ isn't a lie--it's a fact. You're just too dumb/ignorant or dishonest to admit the truth--so YOU lie or you are delusional about your English competency. "I do have some reasons to react on Z's "input". The reasons are: - Z's input is falacious by the fact it is a clear "ad personam" attack. - Z's input is a lie (what makes Z a dishonest liar ). - Z's input claiming he can "argue" is quite false too, as he demonstrated in his first paragraph. - Z's input is quite illogical and contradictory in reasoning versus behaving." "First of all; what Z calls "argumentation" are just "ad hominem arguments", what are in fact no arguments at all, just clear fallacies in logic ( factual false too - thus even can be classified as a clear lie -)."" All of that ^^ is just more evidence of your ignorance, lies, &/ delusions. None of it proves in any way that I have lied about anything--but, apparently you aren't smart or honest enough to realize the truth. re: "Z is a pathological totally dishonest liar." Actually, that ^^ is what you are--a pathological liar. (Edited by zeffur)  Nicotina: Strange that zeff attempts to insult BelgianStrider about the use of English when zeff isn't even fluent in one language. BelgianStrider: Ai, Nicotina's remark will for sure initiate "ad hominem attacks" towards her. And well, following one mastering the language of Shakespearre, it seems Z lacks the "properly education" to be perfectly fluent in that language. (Edited by BelgianStrider) | Science Chat Room 5 People Chatting Similar Conversations |
