Creationism is a mental illness (Page 141)

MJ59: Nope, passed out in the pub!

MJ59:

Feral1711: The Bible was always right. Most astronomers and physicists today believe the universe is not eternal, but came into existence. Steven Hawking himself said most physicists believe the universe came into existence. We know the universe is finite from the radiation echo, the expansion of the universe, the second law of thermodynamics, the Borde–Guth–Vilenkin theorem (2003), and it is implied by Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Astronomer Robert Jastrow of NASA's Goddard Space Institute declared: "The radiation echo has convinced almost the last doubting Thomas." (Jastrow, God and the Astronomers).

A philosophical argument against an eternal universe is the fact that it is impossible to traverse an infinite series of moments. If the universe were infinite (or eternal in the past), this moment would never have arrived.

I don't continue to argue with people who are of bad will and blinded to truth and facts.

Wild__: "I keep the bible in a pool of blood so that none of it's lies can affect me."

kittybobo34: I think the universe is much much bigger than the present paradigm allows,, and that big bangs happen often but so far away that we can't see them.

AretoNyx: True Kitty. That makes it more amazing for sure

MJ59: I remember when I was jesus, good times those!

ghostgeek: You must be disappointed how things turned out, two thousand years down the line.

MJ59: I'm a tad peeved, I must say!

kittybobo34: At least Zeff is in the right room here, proving his creationism is a mental illness.

kittybobo34: So your ignoring millions of years of fossils of different animals, and no bones of todays animals.

kittybobo34: So your theory does not acccount for the 5 major extinctions and the replenishing of life afterward in totally different species. amphibians, then reptiles, 2times dinosaures, then mammals.

ghostgeek: If we're to start arguing over transitional fossils, and whether they exist, perhaps it would be nice to know what it would take to convince a Creationist that such fossils exist.

ghostgeek: Plenty of words but no answer leads me to one simple conclusion. Creationists are full of wind and fury, and not much else.

ghostgeek: All I wanted to know was what it would take to convince a Creationist that transitional fossils exist. What came my way as a response was abuse. I draw my conclusions accordingly.