Mini Ice Age? (Page 31)
alexgabe9999: Are you digressing
Because I have given you a figure that could not possibly create this fantasy
alexgabe9999: We are the same land mass
We have 25 million people
20 million cars
Cows and sheep
2 million horses
Pigs dont count raised indoors
Nitric Oxide in the atmosphere Alex.
Here is a page about it.
I also remember that volcanoes create NO in the atmosphere and guess that clear blue skys lead to less NO compared to cloudy skys.
With the Solar Minimum causing more of less and so more blue skys there might be more changes in the air content but if these effect the thermosphere is anyones guess.
alexgabe9999: Ok...I agree
Stop saying it is man man
Tell the truth
Big Brother with the Solar Panel??
Arguing with the Internet scammers is wrong but I disagree that the Solar Cycles are just going to go back the way they came.
So I at the moment expect a weaker year in Solar Activity terms but not a colder year exactly.
So this leaves the question So what did cause the Maunder and Dalton Minimums??
And I repeat the idea that this is a Minimum going into a warm period like the MWP or a return to the temps the ancient knew even.
alexgabe9999: Do you know
Carbon dioxide is invisible
.03.%...of 1 %...Australia is responsible for
Don't panic! " … there is no indication that we are currently approaching a Maunder-type minimum in solar activity.”
Earthsky looks at the predictions.
Not surprisingly Spaceweather has a big look at the predictions from their appointed panel of scientists.
"SOLAR MINIMUM, CONTINUED: The panel predicts a "fairly weak" Solar Cycle 25. What does that mean? Saying that a solar cycle is "weak" is a bit like saying hurricane season will be "weak." In other words, there may be fewer storms, but when a storm comes, you'd better batten down the hatches. "Weak" Solar Cycle 24 produced a number of intense X-class solar flares, strong geomagnetic storms, and even a Ground Level Event (GLE) when solar energetic particles reached Earth's surface. An equally "weak" Solar Cycle 25 could do the same 3 or 4 years hence" Spaceweather
They still don't make the connection to less weather with less energy or the fact that things change a lot when they can.
Any doubt the Polar Vortex is connected to extreme cold weather in the North was dispelled this when it did another of its elongations and headed for its Final Warming this spring with the obvious results across America and Europe.
alexgabe9999: I cant comment
"PODYA"...SENT ME THE
TYPICAL DEMOCRAT BEHAVIOUR ..VILE CREEPS ARE THEY.....TY
"EXPERTS PREDICT A LONG, DEEP SOLAR MINIMUM: An international panel of researchers led by NASA and NOAA has released a new prediction for the solar cycle: The current solar minimum is going to deepen, potentially reaching a century-class low in the next year or so. This will be followed by a new Solar Max in the years 2023-2026." spaceweather. 13.04.19
Not exactly what a quick read only a day ago would have lead you to believe.
So 24 is actually a deep Minimum. Huh??
And a New Max is in fact another "Little", this time a Little Max.
(Edited by duncan124)
kittybobo34: Watching sun spots and predicting weather is much like trying to read the tea leaves in the bottom of your cup. The Sun is spinning, we are rotating.... it all gets blended or averaged. Now the size and shape of our orbit, planetary wobble, plus green house gasses make a huge difference
" Watching sun spots and predicting weather is much like trying to read the tea leaves..."
There are more scientific views of these more complex activities. Sunspotwatch looks at the data gathered by scientific instruments.
Notice the Solar X-ray flux.
I am sure there are better and more comprehensive computerised views but the weather is a political football.
Here is SWEs contentious report about extreme sea level reaction to the wandering split Polar Vortex and the resulting storms.