Remote Viewing (Page 8)

lori100: search for the video, tom hanks remote viewed, is amazing

lori100: he often tweets showing a lone sock or shoe, gets excited when its a little kid's shoe.....symbol of child abduction by pedos

ghostgeek: I think aliens abducted the video you mentioned.

lori100: look up 'remote viewing tom hanks' , is there

ghostgeek: Mmm, yes, so it is. So it comes down to believing the man or calling him a fraud.

The13th: Its Tom Hanks, you got to believe him.

Corwin: Any man who can love a volleyball that much is okay by me.

lori100: Hanks persona has changed, become so serious and dark

GeraldtheGnome: Tom Hanks is the example for this forum ? What next ? A forum on crystal healing by Lady Gaga if she is into that ?

thr33: Whoever is interested... This is a really cool episode of Astonishing Legends about remote viewing. Lots of cool info. Check out Lori Williams site too. Fun topic.

https://www.astonishinglegends.com/al-podcasts/2022/02/29/ep-226-boundless-remote-viewing-with-lori-williams-part-1

lori100: ^^Lori has worked with Lyn Buchanan

The13th: Buchanan ..... name rings a bell.

lori100: yes, Lyn Buchanan, his video is on page 6, interview, he viewed for the govt, trained many, views for companies also

lori100: something funny, when a group of viewers chat in a zoom they tell their experiences....they say when they try to view the winning lottery numbers they get blocked by a type of moral force that wont let them see it...greed often gets blocked by this force

Corwin: Is that why no psychics could ever collect on the $1,000,000 James Randi Prize offered to anybody who can demonstrate paranormal abilities under controlled laboratory conditions?
This "moral force" detects "greed" and their abilities are blocked?

That's an interesting "catch-22" if that is in fact the case.
If James Randi lowered the prize down to a free Happy Meal at McDonalds, could a remote-viewer then provide empirical evidence of their ability? Or would that still be motivated by greed?

You know me, Lori... I do keep an open mind... but I remain on the "skeptic's" side of this particular debate.
"Remote viewing" should be SO easy to prove. Just write a word or number on a piece of paper and place it in the next room. This should be easily "remotely-viewed".
Why can't they demonstrate this phenomenon to the general public?

lori100: have you seen mentalist Kreskin videos? he did that often, look him up on youtube

lori100: btw, there is a black hole jet/particles ejector jet that changed its position and is now the jet is aimed directly at the earth.....is this the end ??? or message to earth?????

Corwin: Oh YEAH! I remember Kreskin.
I knew about that guy long before the internet was a thing. That guy is mind-blowing.

But the skeptic in me always considered that it still wasn't a "paranormal" phenomenon... but rather an exceptional gift of being able to "read" the people around him... that, and some parlour tricks and misdirection (the usual magician stuff)... I do remember that Kreskin was barred from Casinos.
A guy you would NEVER want to sit down at a poker table with. He can read you like a BOOK.


Is it a "6th sense"?... Or merely the 5 senses used in combination and at such a level that they transcend... the "sum being greater than the whole"?

Certainly food for thought.


Whoops... edit... not the "sum being greater than the whole"
The whole being greater than the sum of its parts.

Yeah.

GeraldtheGnome: Two words for everything that I read in that error ridden session. Yes, right ! what the hell were you two on about or what the hell are you two smoking or getting high off or what thevhell did you two drink ? The truth is out there, I want to believe. I don’t want to believe in the fantasy stories that you both came up with.

lori100: what fantasy?

GeraldtheGnome: Do you hate capitals ? I mentioned fantasies, not just a fantasy. Your Black Hole story, the remote viewing stuff and that ‘Kreskin’, that’s what I am telling you right now.

lori100: all are true and legit, look them up

GeraldtheGnome: I’m a fan of the idea of Alien life, all third and forth close encounter claims are considered to be true and legitimate yet all encounters are not proven to be true. Should I believe that all of those cases are true just because I am for such a thing or should I find out what is true or false or just possible instead ? You should do that to in regards to remote viewing and to anything else as should anyone else with whatever they think is true or false.

Shouldn’t your last sentence have been ‘All of it is true and legitimate, just check them all out’ with a full stop at the end ?