Remote Viewing (Page 7)

GeraldtheGnome: It was justifiably apt, it was not worth deleting because it was true. You think that things such as remote viewing is true yet you have no known evidence that proves that it is true. So think twice before you react and/or tell someone about anything.

lori100: my thread, dont need you bossing me or posting jokes

speedbug103: we had the proof of rv working

GeraldtheGnome: I showed that some things are believed to be true are not true, I never did what you have falsely accused me of. If you think otherwise than that and if ‘Dog face’ thinks otherwise also then show evidence that proves that you are right. Without that it’s just claims by both of you and nothing else.

lori100: parody joker video.....many of the viewers I post have worked for decades for the govt and companies.......they know it works

GeraldtheGnome: Technically it also is not a thread and you both seem to have made the same kind of errors grammatically. Is it a case of multiple accounts on here ?

speedbug103: we were a organized group

GeraldtheGnome: I’ll leave you both to your conspiracy theories.

Corwin: Back off, Gerald.

This is Lori's thread to discuss remote viewing... NOT for people to charge in and crap on her beliefs.

It's her right to dictate the direction this conversation goes. That's her right. It's her thread.

I consider Lori my friend. Mess with Lori and you mess with me... you don't want that.

lori100: ty corwin , hi......sweet.....I dont mind different views but dont like trivial joke stuff

lori100: speedbug, were you in one of the govt remote programs?

GeraldtheGnome: You made a lot of errors just then. Corwin. Don’t be the White Knight on here. I asked her to provide evidence to prove what she has accused me of and of the claims that she has made. So far she is yet to do that. Don’t make threats. We have all typed things on here and technically everything on this site does not include even one thread or a conversation by any of us unless any of us have made an audio or audio visual recording that are on this site.

Forums are also supposed to be a two way by all except by those who are unfair, being critical yet fair is something that no one should punish anyone for. Some are incapable of thinking that it’s even at least possible that if there’s a problem with the far right then there is a problem with the far left too, I though am not accusing any of you of that. Lori and you have to learn not to be so overly sensitive about things and be able to take fair criticism and to deal with unfair criticism appropriately. Sorry, I forgot your name for a second.

Corwin: My name is Corwin. You know that.

I even have my own personalized emotey... I'm pals with the Admins of this site.

Sorry to scare you there Gerald... yes, it's all good... mutual respect and whatnot.

Debate at your leisure... but Lori calls the shots on this thread... if she wants to debate, then debate you will... but that's up to her. It's her thread.

GeraldtheGnome: I forgot for a second and accidentally named you Corbin, someone who at least was on this site if he is no longer on here. Yes, I remember you, you have been on my block list for quite a while. I don’t give a stuff what form of cronyism is going on if that is true, just like your last message all of it is wrong. Forums are a two way thing by all and everyone that cannot stand fair criticism are wasting their time being on this site. Things should only be deleted if they are unfair, if you don’t like that then that is your problem, not mine. Evidence proves what is so, not claims by you, by Lori and by anyone else on this entire site. You never scared me, a threat isn’t by default something that scares the one that the threat is made to. The only thing that scares me is the way you and some others think on this site.

Anyone can do whatever that person wants to do in a forum ? So those that want to put on pornography, including child pornography, snuff films, terrorist footage, rape footage and so on should put any of that on any forum ? I hope not. You did after all claim that whatever is wanted to be on and of course what anyone decides to delete even when it’s best not to should happen. So all forums are supposed to be one way ? I’m alright with forums of mine and of others having fair criticism (minus unfair criticism on it) but at no stage should any forum where an unproven claim is made should be a one way one. So I wouldn’t be so self assured if I was you. At present this is a claim forum and a claim forum only unless someone proves otherwise. Bye, I might as well agree with every Creationist in every forum that they have, it makes as much sense as you do after all. Don’t reply to this, agree to disagree with this if you wish to rather than you just making another claim only.

mrsmargaret48: He just keeps repeating "errors" were made and writing gibberish. Guy as an ego bigger than the internet and thinks he speaks for "others".

Remote viewing, I believe both the Russians and US experimented with it during cold war.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Men_Who_Stare_at_Goats_(film)

GeraldtheGnome: What a load of rubbish. Thanks liar. It's quite hypocritical since you are the one that has the big ego who never thinks that you are wrong with anything. I admit that there are certain things that everyone of us do not know, you though just believes in a book by many authors and thinks that everything in it is true. Find out instead of repeating your own errors. The errors that I have made are what I know are errors, you though thinks that because I don't agree with your superstitious nonsense that I have made errors because I don't stupidly agree with your crap.

Go away troll, leave every forum. Remote viewing and everything else that anyone believes to be true needs to be tested and proven rather than just accepted because you have been told that what you are for is true. Gibberish ? You have trouble spelling things half of the time and you have been suspected by a number of people of pretending to be a nurse. If you are actually a nurse then the standard when you got into it must have been pretty low.

Speaks ? I have typed on here, this isn't a Zoom conference and stop falsely accusing me of speaking for others. You are a Creationists, have a look at the worldwide statistics of just how many Creationists there are in the World. You yourself do not represent what you think most people are. Sure, I don't either, but at least I don't pretend to.

mrsmargaret48: He likes to delete posts that dont agree with him, ego with errors.

GeraldtheGnome: Stay relevant to the forum, not to your unwarranted hatred and lies. Have a look at your last message by the way. Anyway remote viewing just needs to be tested out, that is all.

The13th: Sorry I may not have taken Lori threads more seriously in the past.....this remote viewing stuff.....like you can watch TopGun Maverick 30 years ago? That would be something!

GeraldtheGnome: Whether it’s those that make false accusations or someone that hasn’t done such a thing it’s still all a matter of what evidence can prove what is true by the claimant. It is not dependent on what someone guesses is true about myself or about anyone else or about anything. We’ve all made mistakes, what’s proven to be true is all that matters, well so too is being humble when you are right and the other person is wrong. I do look forward to seeing and hearing evidence that proves that remote viewing is true, if there is any of course.

speedbug103: rv is no toy, don't play with fire.

GeraldtheGnome: That meant nothing. All one needs to show is that it’s proven or at least possible or disproven. Of course if it it can not be proven or disproven then it is possible.

lori100: one of the top remote viewers did a blind view of person pretending to be decent, was initiated in a secret group with drugs, does secret handshakes, manipulates the public, worships the illuminati baphomet....was Tom Hanks......stories of him linked to elite pedo groups, does pedo tweets often

ghostgeek: And of course, you have the sort of evidence that would stand up in court.