Who owns the moon? (Page 4)

Corwin
Corwin: You don't vote for Kings.

The Lady of the Sea of Tranquility, clad in her most shimmering regolith, held aloft the Sword Excalibur, declaring by divine providence that I - Corvin shall be King of the Moon.
9 years ago Report
0
CinnamonPrincess
CinnamonPrincess: its just a rock and dust, u can keep it
9 years ago Report
0
Corwin
Corwin: Oh sure, it is now... but once the Helium-3 mining operations are under way, combing the regolith for the precious fuel for our soon-to-be-built Fusion Power Reactors, I'll be raking (literally "raking" ) in a fortune.
Not to mention the cash that'll roll in from that giant 1000km wide Sony billboard contract.
9 years ago Report
0
LiptonCambell
LiptonCambell: Next thing you know....

9 years ago Report
0
Geoff
Geoff: Wait... did someone +1 the Clangers without thinking to maybe Google them?
9 years ago Report
0
LiptonCambell
9 years ago Report
0
Corwin
Corwin: I'm pretty sure that googling your clangers in public will get you arrested.
9 years ago Report
0
quarks
quarks: googling ones own clangers is better than googling the clangers of another -_-

9 years ago Report
0
Zombieworm
Zombieworm: "The Moon". Hmm. I own MY moon, if that counts?
9 years ago Report
0
airdrie50
(Post deleted by airdrie50 9 years ago)
astridarris
astridarris: I believe WE created the moon in our imaginations. A gift
9 years ago Report
0
Geoff
Geoff: Yeah... that huge lump of solar reflecting rock in orbit is only in the mind of humanity...
9 years ago Report
0
LiptonCambell
LiptonCambell: how come the moon predates humanity by, like, billions of years?
9 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: ---"If quantum mechanics hasn’t profoundly shocked you, you haven’t understood it yet. Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.” -
― Niels Bohr, Essays 1932-1957 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge ..........seems the moon is not real......
9 years ago Report
2
Geoff
Geoff: "The moon is egg. It is known." - Dothraki BS.
9 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: A quote from Einstein’s “Metaphysics of Relativity” (1950) is as follows:

“Physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended (as fields). In this way the concept ‘empty space’ loses its meaning...

The field thus becomes an irreducible element of physical description, irreducible in the same sense as the concept of matter (particles) in the theory of Newton.”
9 years ago Report
1
Geoff
Geoff: "The more you dilute it, the more potent it becomes." - Homoeopathic principle.
9 years ago Report
0
Zombieworm
Zombieworm: It may "lose its meaning" scientifically, however surely it IS real, if we're discussing it, hm?
9 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: Seth-----"Your planetary systems exist at once, simultaneously, both in time and in space. The universe that you seem to perceive, either visually or through instruments, appears to be composed of galaxies, stars, and planets, at various distances from you. Basically, however, this is an illusion. Your senses and your very existence as physical creatures program you to perceive the universe in such a way. The universe as you know it is your interpretation of events as they intrude upon your three-dimensional reality. The events are mental. This does not mean that you cannot travel to other planets, for example, within that physical universe, any more than it means that you cannot use tables to hold books, glasses, and oranges, although the table has no solid qualities of its own."
9 years ago Report
1
LiptonCambell
LiptonCambell: lmao you're quoting Einstein and Bohr alongside your cult leader? Are you serious?

And, of course, you're taking their stances out of context to imply they believe something they do not- got any quotes of Bohr suggesting the moon isn't actually there?
9 years ago Report
3
lori100
lori100: cult leader.........from pg. 1 -----What moon? --------wiki-----Albert Einstein is reported to have asked his fellow physicist and friend Niels Bohr, one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, whether he realistically believed that 'the moon does not exist if nobody is looking at it.' ------------To this Bohr replied that however hard he (Einstein) may try, he would not be able to prove that it does, thus giving the entire riddle the status of a kind of an infallible conjecture—one that cannot be either proved or disproved.
(Edited by lori100)
9 years ago Report
2
LiptonCambell
LiptonCambell: Whats your source lori? You said Wiki, but didn't identify the article....
9 years ago Report
0
lori100
(Post deleted by LiptonCambell 9 years ago)
Corwin
Corwin: Of course... why actually learn about something when you can just quote-mine for the bits and pieces that you like. It doesn't really matter if you haven't a clue about what context they were said in, or what it really means.
9 years ago Report
0
lori100
(Post deleted by LiptonCambell 9 years ago)