the origin of life (Page 3) (Post deleted by CoIin ) (Post deleted by CoIin ) (Post deleted by CoIin ) (Post deleted by CoIin ) slasian: I thought dogs like cattle, they use to heard them, and they are still trying it. But the dogs of our time are no different than the cattle. (Post deleted by CoIin ) slasian: Emm, why don't you write another version of it, considering that story as some sort of dogma. I believe you guys call it these days 'unveiling the secrets of religion' My 'Emm' start with vowel while yours begin with a consonant, Hmm, maybe if you are a great story reader it tells an epic (Edited by slasian) (Post deleted by CoIin ) Likeitornot: holodecker2 I was always under the impression that oxygen would have been toxic to life in those early stages. I think initially life evolved very swiftly over few thousand years… under a million anyway, because there was no law of possibilities and probabilities yet recorded by the DNA. LiptonCambell: ....but what of the fossil evidence that hints at life being older than a few million? Likeitornot: you mean Amen Ra period… When the unwed pregnant woman was before the court…they basically told her to pray to her god amen or amun. The word was later adopted by the Israelites and given a new meaning? oneoftheyeshua: likeitornot sorry but you are wrong ameyn is the hebrew word from-which amen in the english language comes-from the isrealites are were and will always be the one and the only one chosen people of the god period amen period for they and they alone along with some gentiles along the way ushered-in the saver of humanity the jesus period amen period lastly there is one and only one god and he is was and will always be the father of the jesus period amen period Likeitornot: oneoftheyeshua I wouldn’t hold as the only truth, words have a way off changing meaning. I looked if the word actually did exist prior to that initial passage in the OT. It seems not or there are no writings prior to support that notion…. but than again I could be wrong, it wouldn’t be the first time lol (Post deleted by holodecker2 ) One Bar: This thread was good until a blind sheep crashed in and threw cold water. There's been plenty of publicity about the Higgs particle recently, but what about the biologists? How near are they to proving the origins of life? I don't know much about abogenesis, sorry. Can anyone write a short 'abogenesis for retards', focusing on how near/far we are to closing the subject? Geoff, you seem quite knowledgeable and you have orangey skin (from peering into a reactor?) Perhaps you can get this thread going again? Geoff: Purely the lighting when I took this photo, not orangey skin. I am, in actual fact rather pallid. I don't have time to write a short dissertation-for-dummies on abiogenesis right now, I have to take the offshoots of my loins to the pictures, but when I get back (if I am not utterly shattered) I will try to frame the current scientific view on the subject into words of one syllable. (Post deleted by holodecker2 ) One Bar: Great vid and exactly what I requested. Thanks for posting that. I missed it before because I rarely bother licking on video links. "...it's only a matter of time, perhaps easily within your lifetime, that all the steps that make up this process will be understood." | Science Chat Room Similar Conversations |