Evolution in a different light (Page 2) StuckInTheSixties: A fully loaded I-Pod would definitely be better. Oh ... but you'd need some sort of solar or mechanical-powered charger for it, else you'd get only a few hours of "magic" music. Oh ... you'd better be selective as to what music was on it. I'm guessing that in the 17th century, Slayer, or Prince, or Duke Ellington, or Hank Williams, or Scott Joplin ... whatever ... is probably going to be thought of as noise. Oh ... well ... you'd almost certainly be burned as a witch or something, wouldn't you? You'd better be REALLY careful about what technology you took back in time, hmmm?  XFixYourBrainX: I didnt get the kind of reaction I thought I would get out of posting this video. So.... Think about this video in a different way. What do you think the supposed alien voice was talking about? XFixYourBrainX: You dont know 100% So just give your best educated guess on what this means if it were true. StuckInTheSixties: Well, frankly, I didn't listen to more than ... oh ... perhaps twenty seconds of it. So I'm not qualified to express an opinion on what it might mean. What does it mean? XFixYourBrainX: The interrupting broadcast of the 'alien' voice, aka 'unknown' voice interrupted several major radio broadcasting companies. Which were owned by the government. In 1977 it was impossible to break into a radio broadcast. In 1977 the money needed to produce such a hoax would be very expensive. The equipment needed to make this happen would be costly and very hard to get ahold of. The man power needed would be in the hundreds. Now if this were a hoax. Why would anyone want to spend all this time, energy, money, and planning to have nothing to be done in the end? If this were a hoax. What would be the purpose for this hoax? Now think about this. Why would an alien species want to give us advice in the time period in which it did this in? Was it because this alien species seen the futuristic end of our race? You would expect an alien species to have much better technology than us, and experience than us humans. Our race is only barely 4,500 years old, compared to the rest of the universe? There is evidence of other alien species out there we just have to find them first. The possibility of our species being the only intelligent ones in the cosmos would be mathematically, and astronomically impossible to be! XFixYourBrainX: Now to expand your mind even further. Think about this... The signal was so strong that it overtook control of 5 or so other radio stations in the U.K. The duration at which the moderately strong signal held onto was very impressive timeing. They came as quick as they went. And havent been heard of since then. And took control of our feeble radio stations with no resistance at all. XFixYourBrainX: What is the Age of Aquarius? The Age of Aquarius is either the current or new age in the cycle of astrological ages. Each astrological age is approximately 2,150 years-long, on average, but there are various methods of calculating this length that may yield longer or shorter time spans depending upon the technique used. Unlike sun-sign astrology where the first sign is Aries, followed by Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces, whereupon the cycle returns to Aries and through the zodiacal signs again, the astrological ages proceed in the opposite direction or order – normally termed retrograde. Therefore, the Age of Aquarius follows the Age of Pisces. It has been said that we are currently shifting into the Aquarian Age. XFixYourBrainX: To answer that yourself only if you know thyself you can answer this question you have.  LiptonCambell: >>>In 1977 it was impossible to break into a radio broadcast. Ugh....from Wikipedia; "At that time, the Hannington UHF transmitter was unusual in being one of the few transmitters which rebroadcast an off-air signal received from another transmitter, rather than being fed directly by a landline. As a consequence it was open to this kind of signal intrusion, as even a relatively low-powered transmission very close to the transmitter could overwhelm its reception of the intended signal, resulting in the unauthorised transmission being amplified and rebroadcast across a far wider area. The IBA stated that to carry out the hoax would take "a considerable amount of technical know-how" [4] and a spokesman for Southern Television confirmed that "A hoaxer jammed our transmitter in the wilds of North Hampshire by taking another transmitter very close to it." [2]" Impossible, eh? >>>The equipment needed to make this happen would be costly and very hard to get ahold of. Wait- you said it was impossible- now you're saying its just difficult? Which is it? Nonetheless, the fact that it is unlikely that it happened doesn't negate the fact that, if you want to argue how unlikely someone overwhelmed the signal, its far more unlikely that an alien did it. >>>The man power needed would be in the hundreds. Bulllllllshit. This is just like the insistence from the Crop Circles believers that you're required to be a genius in math to design a crop circle. Why would it take hundreds? >>>If this were a hoax. What would be the purpose for this hoax? To mess with people seems to be pretty high on my list. Are you saying people don't do that already? Nonetheless, you should also be asking yourself this- if these aliens are so advanced, why would they contact us at 5:10pm in 1977 to a small portion of the UK, and never again? >>>Was it because this alien species seen the futuristic end of our race? Haha so now they can see the future? And how do you know this? >>>You would expect an alien species to have much better technology than us, and experience than us humans. Ha! The oldest civilization still in existence is China- and their beliefs don't seem all that "enlightened" >>>The possibility of our species being the only intelligent ones in the cosmos would be mathematically, and astronomically impossible to be! You can get all kinds of answers if you make up the numbers. The Ocean contains 3 times as much landmass as the surface- and life supposedly originated from there, as well as having a far great diversity in life. Taking these facts into account, mermaids are far more mathematically likely than us. But no one can find mermaids, despite the math. And no one can find aliens, despite your math. Go figure- reality isn't based on probabilities. This is especially true of made up ones. XFixYourBrainX: The ignorance of bliss is sweet, when candidly unseen by the eyes of the beholder, but no matter how intelligent he thinks he is, no proof undoubtebly holds only as ignorant misunderstood knowledge can be put forth by such a person as lipton, to even come closely to logically understand this happening of truth brought upon, physically, and mentally.  Koko_Krunch: Here is another example of a hijacking of a commercial signal. (On a late-November evening in 1987, two Chicago television stations were victims of a broadcast signal takeover. During the broadcast of a DR. Who episode) Original footage - XFixYourBrainX: OOOooooo lol thats funny, this is a copy cat. Point one he broke in, didnt need any basic knowledge to break through a couple of doors to get into a tv networking station. Second didnt need any money to do this, third no man power. Point two, the 1977 interrupted broadcasting SIGNAL was OVERPOWERED by another signal, not only was this SIGNAL strong enough to OVERPOWER one networking station in the U.K., but the SIGNAL was STRONG enough to OVERPOWER 5 networking stations that were many many miles apart from one another. Point three, only the audio was interrupted meaning, that an outside force/being interrupted the 5 major transmitting signals. Point four, no conventional methods of the time from the ground or air was ever able to interrupt these major signals. StuckInTheSixties: I'm confused about something. If they were so advanced, you know, with their interstellar flying saucers and stuff, why is the sound so poor? Couldn't such an advanced civilization produce a more hi-fi audio? Or were they just good at all the other advanced stuff, but unable to make good sound? XFixYourBrainX: Neither the main T.V. transmitter at Southampton, or the Engineers at Croydon, Surrey who were monitoring Hannington, logged the galactic message, and they were clearly unaware that the Space broadcast was over-riding their signal. By law all radio/T.V. has to have a monitoring system, for an ‘instant switch-off’, technically known as insertion test signals. It did not even register the ‘interruption’ suggesting that it was achieved in some way that bypassed our electrical system. No less than five transmitters were hijacked simultaneously, spread over great distances, and the Independent Broadcasting Authority were not even aware that the message was overriding their signal; as the transmitters would have been switched off immediately. Possibly, this was because the source of the overriding signal was not terrestrial in nature. XFixYourBrainX: Meaning anything detected from the ground to interrupt these signals, the signals would automatically be shut off. But since the signal wasnt interrupted from the ground it wasnt detected. Are any of the NASA transmissions back and forth from Earth to space completely clear back in 1977? StuckInTheSixties: No, but compared to them, we're primitive backwards beings, so I would think they would be more advanced and able to have hi-fi, or dolby or something. How did you learn of all of this stuff? | Science Chat Room 1 Person Chatting Similar Conversations |