Most atheists dont know about science (Page 5)
terryanderson1986: Your so funny ...... faith is neither fact, evidence or truth .... if it had those elements you would not need faith to have faith .... silly boy
Blackshoes: Faith is nothing more than the Belief in things unseen . Have you seen the energy within a atom ! Have you researched all the Science, and News you accept ,and believe' NOPE !
Did you meet George Washington Etc. Etc.
You have Mountains of faith ! You're just too Blind and unknowing too accept the truth .
The evidence is all there. Right before your eyes ! You're not allow to accept or see It .You will see soon enough !
terryanderson1986: You really don't see how wrong those those statements are .... God told me you were a idiot, but I did not belief him .... My lack of belief proves your right..... Yes, I too can talk non logically. ok . enough ... have fun, peace out .... you win ..... I'm done.
kittybobo34: Blackshoes: Faith is partially built on logic as well. With a foundation of understanding and proof, one makes the leap of faith. What we are battling is the foundation of evolution vs the foundation of religious history. I know religious history is full of errors, and I know evolution has been built by proof, step by step.
terryanderson1986: and if anyone knows this girl please tell her I am both afraid and attracted ...> “Do not fall in love with people like me.
I will take you to museums, and parks, and monuments, and kiss you in every beautiful place, so that you can never go back to them without tasting me like blood in your mouth.
I will destroy you in the most beautiful way possible. And when I leave you will finally understand, why storms are named after people.”
Blackshoes: You're more than welcome to show one proof of any species changing into another species
Either in the fossil record or present day . Not assumed and minute changes that Academia has deceived the world into believing they're Pseudoscience of Evolution.
There isn't any proof whatsoever !
There 's mountains of assumptions , conclusion, and many illustrations '.
That's just not science . You maybe easily deceived ? I need real science
Assuming that Microevolutionary Change becomes Macroevolution ',without any Microbiological evidence is ludicrous and ridiculous
Evolution is far more a religion than you've been lead to believe !
It also take more faith than any Religious person I have ever meet to accept such a unproven and unscientific theory
kittybobo34: So how do you explain the fact that the animals today are not the animals of 64 million years ago (pre asteroid hit)
Blackshoes: That's already been explained . 99 % of all Species throughout time have gone extinct. Also many species are no different than they were 65million years ago .
Many other species such as insects are no different than 450 million ago .
It's all assumed . If you had a open mind you'd see that much of what they claim about Geological strata is assumed
If you accept all the unscientific assumption already ',it's not hard to see why so many accept whatever they're told by Academia
There is no fossil evidence of trans species development with out mountains of assumption and conclusions
Evolution is based entirely on the faith of it's followers .
Ignorantly accepting what ever they're told
If Evolutionist had even a rudimentary understanding of microbiology ? they'd would have already seen how ridiculous, and ludicrous a theory it is
Unfortunately : Most are Razzale dazzled by Religious Evolutionary ,Misinformation and Bias Assumption and conclusion's that Academia endless feeds them
You are often told it a argument with Religion
Yes Evolutionist are Unknowing Religious fanatics ?
Believing whatever they've been told by Academia !
The Discussion or Question isn't about religion !
The Question isn't about right and wrong win or lose ?
Because many believers in God ',Don't care whether Evolution is fact or fiction .
Creations work either way !
The Question is about the evidence, and the facts !
In other words the Truth
Below is just one of Hundreds of million of problems with Evolution
kittybobo34: Just watched that BS you posted. One would think if someone were to pretend to be a scientist or know something about evolution he would get his facts straight.
1) The chimp genome is 10% larger than ours. There is less than 2% difference between ours and theirs, thats a bit hard to do if one is 10% larger.
2)Chimps & Human diverged 250k to 2 mill years ago. Every paleontologist/ anthropologist knows that we diverged from a common ancestor more than 5 million years ago. 250k years ago we diverged from homo erectus. and they died out.
3) Excessive mutations cause extinction. That is a totally made up stat. The biggest factor there, is the population density, a large population offers more opportunity to mutate and at the same time dampens the degree of change from the majority population.
So in effect you are listening to people paid to lie, because it takes a bit of skill to lie effectively with people who aren't familiar with the facts.
terryanderson1986: Well said Kitty.... obviously you do not drink and text ... or you do it exceedingly well.
kittybobo34: lol, did you listen to that drivel, can't believe the guy would have gotten a degree unless it was an online course. I wish it was illegal to publish lies like that. I guess its a profitable enterprise he probably sold the books and videos to every bible thumper in the english speaking world.
terryanderson1986: I'm actually waiting for the "earth is 10,000 yrs old" and flat post before I respond. Actually I was so taken aback that I was rendered typeless by the sheer idiocy of it. To date only Trump has done this to me.
Blackshoes: If Evolution was even remotely Scientific' I would gladly accept it
After all you look and act like apes too me
You used the term liar ' tell me where did you receive your information ?
You where spoon feed by those that believe and accept a falsehood or lie, depending or which term you wish ?
Mutation are not beneficial That a Scientific fact .
No research has ever shown even the possibility of any mutation leading to Macroevolution Yet : Academia continues to teach this BS
Apes are not Human fact .
Ape genes and Human DNA can only be compared with ours DNA . If you reject over 50% of the lengths of both DNA . Researcher also disregard 90 % what they consider Junk DNA that's Scientific fact.
Thus the Researchers an Academia are Lying or at the very lease deceiving those they teach ?
You blindly accept whatever they say Due to your belief in the religion of Evolution that rejects the truth evidence and the facts !
I assume you'll likely reject this video also if you find the time or attention span too watch it ?
kittybobo34: I have to give the guy an award for talking a long time without saying anything. But, I waded through it. Like the other video, it's full of misinformation.
1) he comments our gene structure is always lossing information, not gaining. Well thats why sex works, the match of one persons genes to another verifys the sequense.
2)he comments that all mutations are bad. Not true, otherwise adaptations would not be possible.
3) he says that adaptations are instigated by the cell to an environmental issue. Thats like the middle ages concept that if your dad is a black smith, his son will be born with stronger arms. total BS. Mutations are random and mostly not useful, but when it is there is a benefit, that allows for that person to have more offspring. Case in point: Malaria is a real killer in Africa. A mutation occurred changing the structure of the blood cell that gave a resistance to its owner. That mutation is now widely spread in african blood lines.
4)He says there are no transitional fossils. Almost every fossil we find is a subtle transition from something else. Tons of whale fossils from when they were shallow water animals in the hippo niche, to where they are now. Lots of horse fossils too back to the eohippus (deer like animal) , he would say its a different animal, but you forget the teeth are the finger print of the species.
5) he comments on the cambrian explosion, and says that nearly all the phyla are already there, Well Duh, that is when these things started, like the first back bones and internal skeletons, we find it then because they were the first ones. We don't find it anywhere before that time because it didn't exist earlier.
6) he starts in on Lucy, the first austrolopithicus found, and claims its a work of engineering to get the parts to look the way they wanted. He doesnt mention that she had our teeth, or that all the other austrolopiticus finds are the same. Upright pelvis, head on the top of the shoulders, long arms, short legs, more chimp like head than ours now. This guy could run fast on all fours, stand tall, swim, and climb fast. Since then we have found about 12 of these animals. Looks like they were pretty successful species at around 3 million years ago in that little part of eastern africa. He also mentioned body hair, there has been a lot of conjecture about that. Some think because we had adapted to water and swimming, and had a new cooling system (sweating) that we had already started to loose most of the body hair. Hard to tell, we would have to find one that was smashed into a layer of mud, then buried in silt to get a skin pattern.
At this point I was only half way through this propaganda shpeal, too many mistakes, for anyone to put faith into.
terryanderson1986: You are a excellent wader .... I bow to your patience and persistence ... my brain shut down at the 70 second mark .... Tough and pretty ,,, wow.