Most atheists dont know about science (Page 285) Blackshoes: No no, let us come here and criticize insult and avoid the subject rather than be educated and discuss the subject. After all, it's far smarter and intelligent to be linguistically correct rather than inform the public We all assume every troll wants to look superior to everyone else. Let us not tell the truth, let us all sheepishly follow the leaders that endlessly tell us all what we want to hear.\ As long as they can construct a sentence.  So right', why would us poor poor fools seek or desire the truth  (Edited by Blackshoes) Blackshoes: " It is, in fact, nothing short of a miracle that the modern methods of instruction have not yet entirely strangled the holy curiosity of inquiry; for this delicate little plant, aside from stimulation, stands mainly in need of freedom; without this it goes to wrack and ruin without fail. It is a grave mistake to think that the enjoyment of seeing and searching can be promoted by means of coercion and a sense of duty. " Albert Einstein  (Post deleted by staff ) (Post deleted by staff )
Blackshoes: I assume we all would all seek the truth. However: I've often been so wrong about peoples motives  Greed, want, and ego, so often rules human nature and clouds their minds to simple truths (Edited by Blackshoes) Blackshoes: Doesn't any evolutionist ask themself why we haven't seen any evidence of Marcoevolutionin research whatsoever. "Experiments designed to detect evolution should have caught a glimpse by now, but they have not. When researchers simulated fruit fly evolution by systematically altering each portion of fruit fly DNA, they found only three resulting fruit fly categories, published in 1980: normal, mutant, or dead.2 A 2010 study found no net fruit fly evolution after 600 generations.3 Similarly, microbiologists watched 40,000 generations of E. coli bacteria become normal, mutant, or dead.4 None truly evolved.5 Big-picture evolution did not happen in the past, and it is not happening now. Other evidence excludes evolution from real science."  kittybobo34: Perhaps because the so called scientists you mention above seem to know nothing about evolution. E coli bacteria do not use sexual reproduction. Fruit Flies have been known to change, there are allot of varieties of Fruit Flies. Wrecking their genetic structure and expecting new species to evolve is great for determining what specific genes do, but it has nothing to do with evolution. My guess is this is another Creationist attempt at distorting science. (Edited by kittybobo34) Blackshoes: They where Evolutionary scientist that made the studies on fruit flies and bacteria! Not made by creationist. Wherefore who is distorting the facts. Not creationist. Whether or not you believe it or reject it, the science is clear as day! Nothing has ever been observed to change into another species. (Edited by Blackshoes)  ghostgeek: Who says atheists know nothing about science? I know that science says that the earth goes round the sun, unlike what the Christian Church used to maintain. (Post deleted by staff ) (Post deleted by staff ) Blackshoes: I don't agree with the Forums title Ghost. Athiest are no brighter or dimmer than anyone else! (Post deleted by staff ) Blackshoes: They're end is darkness all the while believing themself light It's just the facts Jack. (Edited by Blackshoes) (Post deleted by staff ) (Post deleted by Blackshoes ) (Post deleted by staff ) (Post deleted by staff ) | Science Chat Room 1 Person Chatting Similar Conversations |
