Most atheists dont know about science (Page 109) AchillesSinatra: I have never challenged instrumental efficacy. What I have been challenging is the literal truth of scientific theories. For the record, are you telling us that Einstein's theories should not be believed to be true? (Edited by AchillesSinatra) theHating: This is how it goes on wireclub Make fun of blackshoes for being in denial --> Achilles comes to defend the helpless creationist nutters --> Achilles gets his much earned attention --> All the nutters adorn achilles with alpha nutter respect ->> Achilles shuts down the beta nutters -->> Achilles resumes shaming ignorant denizens to maintain status quo and leadership of an ironically unorganized cult following; the subconscious manifestation of combined nutters all on one forum. I've seen it happen before.. on Craigslist AchillesSinatra: I agree. Some swans are grey. But according to bivalent logic, a statement is either true of false. Are you refuting bivalent logic now? (Edited by AchillesSinatra) AchillesSinatra: It sure does. But please please please answer the question.... If a theory is construed as a conjunction of claims... [a & b & c &.... n] if any one of the conjuncts is false then the theory is false. Right? Or are you gonna invent "unrecognized forces" preventing logic from working as it should now? kittybobo34: In your little math case, if A and B are true, but C and D are false, then the statement is 1/2 true Angry Beaver: half-truth noun: half-truth; plural noun: half-truths a statement that conveys only part of the truth kittybobo34: Einsteins theorys works great in the molecular universe, but not at all in the quantum universe AchillesSinatra: Do you have a source for logic which assigns a value of "1/2 truth"? I know of none. kittybobo34: I haven't used that kind of logic in many years. Seems like we used it in electronics and AI work more than anything. | Science Chat Room 1 Person Chatting Similar Conversations |