Astronomy & Astrology (Page 12)

StuckInTheSixties
StuckInTheSixties:

Brass:

First, I thought you were a guy. No one here is using any references to your gender, implied or otherwise. So much for the the sexism charge.

Second ... and it's inexcusable that you can't acknowledge this ... when making a claim, the burden of proof falls on the person making that claim. A reader asking for references is reasonable. Refusing to provide them, and asking others to do your legwork for you, is unreasonable.

11 years ago Report
1
brassinpockets
brassinpockets: sweetie.i gave you the title of the article. and here Lipton gave you the link. can you please do something about your really contentious behavior. You are negative negative negative.. then NASTY if anyone has evidence to the contray, that your very limited mind allows you to perceive.

In short, STUCK, you are not fun to talk to. AS to my gender , scroll back... it was discovered I am a female early in your heated arguements against the emprical method of testing for scientific data. You no doubt will argue this alls. But i mean what I said.... I can't try to drag you out of the 18th century, or out of
the mud
And Lipton thank you so much, but be aware these two will argue anything in an attempt to get a foothold on somethign which pases for validity.....
and now dears, my degree and I are going ELSEWHERE.

Stay here to long and your iQ will drop 15 points

11 years ago Report
1
StuckInTheSixties
StuckInTheSixties:

brassinpockets says:
i gave you the title of the article. and here Lipton gave you the link.

True, but not until AFTER I asked. Your reply was based on my request made BEFORE you provided that title, and BEFORE Lipton came up with the link. I made a simple request, and now you're getting all petulant about it.

brassinpockets says:
can you please do something about your really contentious behavior. You are negative negative negative.. then NASTY if anyone has evidence to the contray, that your very limited mind allows you to perceive.

Feel free to report me to Wireclub Administration if you feel I've violated the Terms of Service. Just hover your cursor next to the time stamp and the word "report" will appear in blue font. Click that to complain.

brassinpockets says:
In short, STUCK, you are not fun to talk to.

No need to reply if you feel that way.

brassinpockets says:
AS to my gender , scroll back... it was discovered I am a female early in your heated arguements against the emprical method of testing for scientific data.

If so, I don't remember. The gender of a user with a generic avatar isn't high in my priorities.

brassinpockets says:
You no doubt will argue this alls.

Of course.

brassinpockets says:
But i mean what I said.... I can't try to drag you out of the 18th century, or out of
the mud

A funny (and ironic) remark from someone that argues the validity of astrology.

brassinpockets says:
And Lipton thank you so much, but be aware these two will argue anything in an attempt to get a foothold on somethign which pases for validity.....

Lipton's reply was, indeed, completely valid and valuable.

brassinpockets says:
and now dears, my degree and I are going ELSEWHERE.

Bye!

brassinpockets says:
Stay here to long and your iQ will drop 15 points

Better leave, then. A fifteen point drop would be difficult to withstand from someone with only [whatever your IQ is].

11 years ago Report
0
xapim
xapim: "once in a blue moon" occurs, maybe aug,31st this is astrology or astronomy ?
11 years ago Report
0
StuckInTheSixties
StuckInTheSixties:

Astronomy. And it's not "maybe." August 31 will have a "blue moon."

(Edited by StuckInTheSixties)
11 years ago Report
0
duncan124
duncan124:
bah Loser! GEEE Stuck you can,t even have a nice talk about a subject you choose Bah!!

"....my degree and I are going ELSEWHERE."

11 years ago Report
2
StuckInTheSixties
StuckInTheSixties:

** said in a very dry tone of voice with an inflection that suggests utter boredom**

I'll alert the media ...

11 years ago Report
0
duncan124
duncan124:
Why what does it mean?
11 years ago Report
0
StuckInTheSixties
StuckInTheSixties:

It's the use of a movie quote to convey a sarcastic response.

The movie is "Arthur." The quote is Sir John Gielgud being snarky to Dudley Moore:



You probably won't understand that, but that's the explanation you requested.

11 years ago Report
0
Hyenablood
Hyenablood: sits just to let you know, you are just so damn sexy, now you can get on with the rest of your life.
11 years ago Report
0
StuckInTheSixties
StuckInTheSixties:

Hahaha!

I'm pretty sure there are those that would argue with you about my sexiness, but thanks! I appreciate the thought!

Duncan, do you think I'm sexy?

11 years ago Report
0
CoIin
CoIin: Stay on topic, please

But you ARE quite sexy, SITS
11 years ago Report
0
StuckInTheSixties
StuckInTheSixties:

Quit drooling!

And please stay on topic!

11 years ago Report
0
Page: First ... 789101112