Do you think the consipracy nuts will shut up now? (Page 23)
AretoNyx: Mars bars are real... Mars is real...but tell any one with a religion to deny reality... Well guess I am a Mars Girl to them
Corwin: It's the same Science though, Zeff.
It's math, it's deductive reasoning. The same "process" of learning the truth is what Science "is".
Where do we draw the line between Science that we accept, and Science that "crosses the line" of long-held ancient beliefs?
Is it the fault of Science when it comes up with unpleasant or perceived abominable realities? Or are they just doing their jobs?
Who has the "agenda"... and who is "biased" based on "preconceived religious beliefs?"
Ask yourself this.
zeffur: re: "Corwin: It's the same Science though, Zeff."
No, actually it isn't science to pretend in the existence of an original microbe that evolved into every other form of life--there just isn't ANY basis at all to such a biased & bogus belief.
re: "It's math, it's deductive reasoning. The same "process" of learning the truth is what Science "is"."
Not even close. Evolution is pseudoscience. It has ZERO sound basis for it's beliefs. There is no proof or compelling/convincing evidence & a cogent explantion to substantiate/verify/confirm their biased & bogus beliefs--NONE. It's just based on their biased beliefs, misinterpretation & misrepresentation of the available evidence.
re: "Where do we draw the line between Science that we accept, and Science that "crosses the line" of long-held ancient beliefs?"
Their observations are not true & they have zero tests to confirm that any of their beliefs are true--how anyone could call that bonafide 'science' is beyond reasonable--that's why it is a theory & not scientific fact that anyone should take seriously in any way.
re: "Is it the fault of Science when it comes up with unpleasant or perceived abominable realities? Or are they just doing their jobs?"
What? It's just pure rubbish without any genuine/sound basis whatsoever--no one should accept any of it because it has never been proven to be scientific fact. It's a poor conflation of real genetics with completely fabricated biased beliefs--nothing more & certainly not worth anyone's time. In reality it provides nothing useful to society. It would be better used as kindling to start fires... Frankly, it's a tragedy that kids are even required to listen to such crapola in schools.
re: "Who has the "agenda"... and who is "biased" based on "preconceived religious beliefs?"
I don't think it's hard to figure out both sides have their agenda--that much is plainly obvious. One side represents truth (God's side) & the other represents a conjob to support their indefensible belief system.
re: "Ask yourself this. "
It don't need to ask myself such a basic question for something so obvious.
Now back to my post that you stated that you would address but you have not addressed:
re: "zeffur: I never asserted that you only view evolution websites." here: Topic: Science
(Edited by zeffur)
Well, that's practically a swear-word now.
Science offers truth... I feel bad for those who cannot decipher the language of truth.
They have my condolences.
zeffur: My hypothesis is that if I hit your thumb with a metal hammer with enough force I will injure your thumb.
I can prove that belief is true with a simple test in which I strike your thumb with a metal hammer.
I perform the test & your thumb becomes injured. The test result proves my hypothesis/belief is true.
Now you do that with evolution's beliefs:
1. That a single microbe is the orgin of all life on earth.
2. That evolution of that microbe has actually occurred.
3. That evolution continues to actually occur today.
Well all know you cannot prove your beliefs are true because you cannot create a test that proves your beliefs are true. If you don't agree--then prove me wrong.
Ridiculous eye rolls aside... Ready, set, go!
(Edited by zeffur)