Odds of other life in the Universe (Page 5)

bitemykayak
bitemykayak: there maybe 30 billion planets in the milky way but only 1.6 billion contain water in liquid form and are considered life friendly
3 years ago Report
0
Blackshoes
Blackshoes: That's huge assumption after all what we know of our own solar ' Life only exist here ,on just one out of the eight planets
(Edited by Blackshoes)
3 years ago Report
0
bitemykayak
bitemykayak: Life theorists consider life on other planets a certainty but also consider it unlikely that this life is more than single cell microbes. Higher life (multi cell life) is probably an earth only event though its possible its elsewhere. The biological circumstances that lead microbes to develop mitochondria that used oxidation as an energy generator is beyond a statistical anomoly, and may have happened only on earth. I know some will say that its happened on earth and the universe is soo big it will or has happened elsewhere, but the experts admit while its possible, it may be unlikely even given the universes vastness and great numbers
3 years ago Report
0
bitemykayak
bitemykayak: The 1.6 billion is arrived through extrapolation from detailed surveys, a method scientifically reliable and considered acceptable by our legal system
3 years ago Report
0
Blackshoes
Blackshoes: I sure it's a reasonable assumption . None the less\" it's just assumed that life can survive on planets that we have no knowledge of whatsoever
3 years ago Report
0
bitemykayak
bitemykayak: If there is liquid water it is assumed that life can survive
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: We have found life in volcanic vents, just short of boiling, life deep in caves and consumes rock for energy. It seems that once life gets a foothold it adapts to every environment.
3 years ago Report
0
bitemykayak
bitemykayak: No Black, im saying its believed that life can survive on planets where water can be found
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: Seems that microbial life existed on this planet in the 1st billion years. But, complex life took another 3 billion to evolve, then another 500 million to get to intelligent life.
3 years ago Report
0
Blackshoes
Blackshoes: Really have they been able to prove or show that life evolve here ? Don't you think it a little odd' that they have no scientific evidence or facts to show such assumptions as possible ?
(Edited by Blackshoes)
3 years ago Report
0
bitemykayak
bitemykayak: We exist here is evidence that life evolved here. We are life arent we.
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: The classification system is all about how the evolution progressed, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species, Variety. But all this didn't even start till the first 2 bacteriums formed a simbiotic relationship, making the first cell.
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: As far as evidence we have tons of it, in fossils. all the way back to those microbes. Something like 8.9 million species now, I am betting most of them didn't make it on the Ark.
(Edited by kittybobo34)
3 years ago Report
0
Blackshoes
Blackshoes: True .entirely based On the assumption' that species evolved

"The classification system is all about how the evolution progressed"

Once you strip away all the religious assumption of Evolution ', you'll Quickly understand how unscientific it is .

The truth is simple . Though it may make sense that you're little more than a monkey ',because Apes and Primates Humans may look alike and act alike ,it's not Scientifically possible.

Actually we have far more in Common socially with Wolfs than we do with Apes

Because you want something be true', doesn't make a fact
(Edited by Blackshoes)
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: so you are totally ignoring all the evidence of early pre humans like Lucy and the first family, Neandertal, homo erectus, homo gigantus etc..
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: as well as the early ape fossils that were very similar to the early hominids.
3 years ago Report
0
bitemykayak
bitemykayak: The evolutionary road of homo sapiens is only partially mapped out, but the road is complete enough to see a direct progression. Im addition, DNA analysis show genetic links to extinct ancestors of modern humans, bt genetic links i mean actual DNA. Let me guess, DNA is not scientifically possible either lol.
3 years ago Report
0
MrNoone 0
MrNoone 0: its all conspiracy
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: Don't forget the Teeth, that's the fingerprint of a species. Lucy and the first family all had our teeth.
3 years ago Report
0
bitemykayak
bitemykayak: I know, ask the men in black lol
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: With Blackshoe, I have given up trying to talk to him of science, he just doesn't understand it well enough. So I am resorting to the facts he can't deny like fossils, recently divided species like horses and donkeys, lions and tigers, Dolphins and whales with the bones structure for feet even though they have evolved into fins. Islands where new species have appeared, even though there was no island during some supposed creation. hmm just occured to me, he might think the earth is only 6000 years old.
3 years ago Report
0
bitemykayak
bitemykayak: hes been brainwashed, he is scared, so denies.
3 years ago Report
0
Blackshoes
Blackshoes: You just keep telling yourself and others that line
The facts do not support your theory 'only assumptions do !
What's supposedly so hard that I'm unable to understand ?
It's impossible for Life to have developed on its own here on earth
Therefore what chance would it have' In unknown ,and likely far harsher Environments outside the Earth ?

(Edited by Blackshoes)
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: What's hard to understand is why you don't think the facts support the theory, or why you think its impossible for life to have evolved here, when the evidence clearly shows that it did. Or, why you think the creation concept fits the facts when it doesn't.
3 years ago Report
0
kittybobo34
kittybobo34: Just watched the last video post. He says the fossil record makes no sense, well I guess it doesn't if you want it to prove creation. It does show progressive changes in all species, especially plants. It shows for instance how dino's ceased to exist after the comet extinction or KT event and the only mammals were small burrowing versions like the possums and squirrels and from that the fossil record shows steady variations and new animal species filling all the niches that were abandoned by the dino's to the point of this world having large mammals like the mastodons, and giant ground sloths. and then another major extinction when the climate changed to rotating ice ages as we have now.
He comments on how we can't test our theory like we do in Physics. Yet somehow he neglects to notice how genetics has been teased down the the specific genes that make each organ, and how genetic engineering has been successful in showing how the changes work. He also mentioned the genetic algorithms and how they don't work, but forgets the success of those algorithms is why we can do genetic engineering now.
3 years ago Report
0