After reading bible i found scientific errors on very ist page. And found may lies in it. Sassy: Neither the Bible nor the Koran are scientifically sound, since they were written as religious textbooks and were never meant as guides in scientific disciplines. Therefore, one would need to bend and stretch their content out of proportions for it to fit any scientific model in a satisfactory way. If you want more relevant material, old Greek and Indian sources contain what seem to be obviously scientific references, but also they must be heavily interpreted to fit in.  oh_good_laughs: Bible true, Islam lie. Jesus die for your sins snawni, he love you, Pray about it. Have good day.  Agricola: This is why we don't find copies of the Quran or the bible in science labs or used in scientific research. Gygaxx: You think Einstein would have discovered the theory of relativity by reading the Bible? ROFLWROFL!!! skully: We are debating the Bible's possible influence on Einstein's theory here, not the way Creationists decades later try to harmonize it with their view. Gygaxx: If Einstein called the Bible primitive and childish, I guess he meant it in a scientific way. But nevertheless, he put words on an opinion that is shared by many. Bodmin: It's not difficult to find contradictions and inconsistencies in either book. But to call them "lies", you need to have a religious agenda and a personal standard to compare them to. Nathaniel Nirvana: agree with Bodmin there are a lot of contradiction/inconsistencies, and the bible is full of parable stories which are more open to interpretation than outright lies Airstream: There is a great difference between believing in religious symbols and accepting them as literal truths. Nathaniel Nirvana: what about anorobic vegetation, like that at the depths of the ocean, not dependent on the sun tho let there be light came b4 the sun was made, so there would have been light for the vegetation | Religion Chat Room 34 People Chatting Similar Conversations |
