Trump (Page 3) (Post deleted by srbiddy09 ) (Post deleted by srbiddy09 ) (Post deleted by srbiddy09 ) (Post deleted by srbiddy09 ) srbiddy09: Sorry, David and Pegasos--but you aren't allowed to post your lies here anymore. Have a blessed day. (Post deleted by srbiddy09 ) (Post deleted by srbiddy09 ) Apokalupto: Your thread is "fake news" because all differing ideas and posts contrary to Trump inciting violence (lol) are immediate deleted and removed. (Edited by Apokalupto) (Post deleted by srbiddy09 ) KeithJ: Biddy he does NOT believe in the truth ,,,he is just another Dumptard worshiper that is brainwashed and would probably eat the runny shit right out of Trumptard's adult diaper . (Post deleted by srbiddy09 ) srbiddy09: Pegasos, If you haven't found any objective evidence that Trump incited violence at the Capitol on January 6th, then you mustn't be looking too hard. LOL Seriously, you are a fucking imbecile. Apokalupto: Like I said, I watched the live stream during his entire speech at capital hill, the whole thing, Donald Trump never incited violence, but instead urged peace and non violence, this was echoed on his twitter just before he was banned from it and account activity wiped clean (Like the comments here) (lol), I know because I saw it myself with my own two eyes. So i'm still here waiting for a link since you haven't provided any objective evidence to your claims and instead delete all opposition to your echo chamber. It shouldn't be too hard to provide a simple link. If Trump later incited violence by texting it on his twitter (Because it's not in his speech) then we are all duped because TWITTER REMOVED THE EVIDENCE -in which case Twitter needs to be held accountable for tampering with evidence- -but Twitter can't be held accountable for tampering with that evidence unless it can first be produced that Trump incited violence to begin with, because how can you hold someone (Twitter) accountable for tampering with evidence if there is no evidence that they tampered with any? You can continue to ignore objectivity and rational discussion and resort to cheap name calling and deleting posts, but in the end, it's not really doing you or anyone else any favors. (Edited by Apokalupto) (Post deleted by srbiddy09 ) srbiddy09: Pegasos, you only see what you want to see. Obviously, those imbeciles who stormed the Capitol were there because Trump riled them up with false claims about election fraud and sent them there, while he went back to the White House to watch the "festivities" on television. Also, during the riot, when his own Vice President asked him to step in and quell the violent mob, he instead sent those lawbreaking cretins a message that said "You're special" and "We love you." And I will apologize in advance for this completely ad hominem remark, but you really are a fucking imbecile. Apokalupto: You just deleted evidence of Trump Defense Attorney for the second time proving that nothing he said was inciting violence. Lol, instead it showed the gross negligence of character and honesty on the part of the democrats and their gross bias toward Trump. I provide evidence and links and you do not, instead you resort to cheap name calling, and of course, deletions. You aren't objective biddy, i'm sorry, and you are obviously wrong about your cnn fake news parroted accusation...lol srbiddy09: Pegasos, it's clear that you and I have vastly different views about Trump and the 2020 election. Moreover, it is likely that I will never convince you that you are wrong, and you certainly will never convince me that you are right. So how about we agree to disagree and you can move on and preach your message to someone else who may be more interested in hearing it? Take Care KeithJ: yeah biddy he probably believes Dumpty when he said " good people on both sides" which included Neo Nazi's too . srbiddy09: Yes, Keith--I find it hard to admire someone who praised the Proud Boys on national television. | Politics Chat Room 68 People Chatting Similar Conversations |