Russian in US is revealed as the sourse for Sterle Dossier in investigation (Page 16)

Denmarkian: Defund the Police Activists Actress Alyssa Milano Hypocrisy EXPOSED, After She Calls the Cops on Kid
https://www.patrioticviralnews.com/articles/defund-the-police-activists-actress-alyssa-milano-hypocrisy-exposed-after-she-calls-the-cops-on-kid/

We’ve been hearing it for months now. Defund the police. Abolish the police. All cops are bad. These are the mantras of Black Lives Matter and their supporters. These slogans have been chanted in the streets of every city of our great nation. There is no subtlety, nuance or room for confusion. We know what they want, and they even got it for a few weeks in Seattle. We all saw how that went.

We all knew that this would end in hypocrisy. Is there any alternative when it comes to the far-left? We knew that they would verbally and physically attack the police, but when they got scared, they’d expect the cops to come running.


Well, the left’s hypocrisy on police has shown its head. A celebrity actress who has been championing these cries of defunding the police and getting rid of police just called them because she was afraid in her house when she thought she heard gun shots from somewhere in her neighborhood.

That might sound reasonable until you find out the facts. Regardless, depending on the police for protection after labeling them as bad, and racists, and trying to get them killed is the height of hypocrisy. Despite that, the police responded, just like they always do.

This video covers the details. You thought that you couldn’t respect Alyssa Milano any less. You were wrong. By the time you learn about this story, you’ll be embarrassed on her behalf. It’s that bad, and yet, we all knew it would end this way.

Denmarkian: Reminder: Democrats NEVER Accept Close Election Results
https://www.leagueofpower.com/reminder-democrats-never-accept-close-election-results/

I am jubilant and highly confident that Donald John Trump is headed for reelection in a few weeks. With that being said, I implore you – I beg of you – get out and vote on November 3rd. Vote in person, either on a machine or paper ballot if you can, but VOTE. We need a major Trumpslide in November, for the good of the country.

When a Republican candidate wins by a landslide, it always makes the Democrats’ insane base shut up and calm down for a while. (Boy, could America use that right now!) But it is also the only thing that prevents the Democrats from making up an insane conspiracy theory about how the Republican “stole” the election. Don’t believe me? Let’s crack open a history book.

Close election, but Richard Nixon won.

Ku Klux Klan collusion!

It was inconceivable to the Democrat Party that Nixon could have eked out a win by promising to get America out of its disastrous misadventure in Vietnam. Nixon promised to end the war and bring the troops home.

This is where the myth of Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” was born. According to the media and the Democrats, Nixon used racist dog whistles in his “Southern Strategy” (a strategy of the Nixon campaign that oddly did not exist) to reach out to the Ku Klux Klan with a secret message that he was going to reintroduce slavery, etc., etc., which tricked the Klan to switch parties after a hundred years and suddenly vote for the Republican. (See also the Obama 2008 campaign, Biden 2020 campaign and Black Lives Matter.)

When Nixon pounded the Democrats with the single largest electoral and popular vote landslide in 1972, they couldn’t come up with any viable conspiracy theory to try to delegitimize the victory. They still managed to destroy him through a “scandal” that now looks like a game of Tiddlywinks when compared to the treason of Obamagate.



Close election, but Ronald Reagan won.

Iranian mullah collusion!

The former governor of California, Ronald Reagan, somehow managed to sneak over to Iran and hatch a secret plan with the mullahs: Keep American embassy personnel as hostages until after the 1980 election in a plot to make Jimmy Carter look weak and ineffectual.

Spoiler alert: The Iranian mullahs already thought Jimmy Carter looked weak and ineffectual, because A) Jimmy Carter was weak and ineffectual, and B), they had been thumbing their noses at America for the entirety of the Carter presidency, mainly because Jimmy Carter was… weak and ineffectual.

The mullahs actually did not release the hostages immediately after the election, which sort of ruins the whole conspiracy theory. They held the Americans captive right up until the moment of Reagan’s inauguration, and then turned them loose.

They knew that the Gipper wasn’t making empty threats and wouldn’t try to appease them like you-know-who.

George HW Bush snags a come-from-behind win over Dukakis.

Racism collusion!

Bush was racist against black people, and that spurred all of the racists who don’t normally vote to turn out and edge Bush across the finish line. The Democrats’ proof of this was the brilliant Willie Horton ads, created by the great Floyd Brown. Willie Brown was a black criminal who traveled from Massachusetts to another state to massacre and rape people, thanks to Dukakis’ genius idea to give criminals weekends off from, you know, prison.

Democrats couldn’t accept that the soft-on-crime stylings of Dukakis were what cost him the election, so they had to reinflate the conspiracy theory of racism.

George W. Bush narrowly defeats Al Gore after the Florida recount.

Supreme Court collusion!

Former Jeffrey Epstein attorney, Harvard law professor and accused pedophile Alan Dershowitz even wrote a book about this one. Bush, who didn’t hold any government office at the time, hatched a secret plan with five Supreme Court Justices to steal the election from Al Gore.k

Bush narrowly defeats John Kerry.

Halliburton collusion!

Evil corporation Halliburton wanted to keep the “real” president – Dick Cheney – in office for four more years, so the company hacked the voting machines in the state of Ohio to give Bush the victory.

And of course, you know how 2016 turned out and know all about the insane Russian collusion conspiracy theory that the Democrats hatched for that one. That’s why we need to deliver a Donald Trump landslide in 2020. It’s the only way to shut them up and hopefully – hopefully – finally lower the temperature in America again.

Denmarkian: Report: Will Your Mail Ballot Count in the Presidential Election? It May Depend on Who's Counting and Where
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/mail-in-ballots-counting-location-problems/

Two elderly women in small towns in Wisconsin voted by mail during April’s presidential nominating contests. Both were sheltering in place as coronavirus surged across their state.

Each mailed her ballot to the local election office with a note explaining why no witness had signed the envelope, as Wisconsin’s strict voting laws require. The women didn’t want to risk virus exposure, they told Reuters in telephone interviews this month.

That’s where the similarity ends. The ballot of Peggy Houglum, a 72-year-old voter in the eastern Wisconsin hamlet of Cedar Grove, was rejected due to the missing witness information. That of Judith Olson, 88, a resident of the northern town of Elk, was accepted, according to “incident” logs viewed by Reuters in which Wisconsin election offices document irregular ballots. Houglum, who plans to vote for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden in November, said she was never told her ballot didn’t count. Olson wouldn’t provide her party affiliation or say whom she supports for president.

Local election officials confirmed the fate of those ballots. Cedar Grove Village Clerk Julie Brey told Reuters she had sought guidance from the Wisconsin Elections Commission on what to do. Her Elk counterpart, Suzanne Brandt, said she couldn’t recall who advised her to accept an unwitnessed ballot.

The unequal treatment in the same crucial battleground state underscores a growing worry about the general election on Nov. 3 between Biden and incumbent Republican President Donald Trump. Whether or not a mail ballot is counted could depend to a large degree on how local election workers enforce mail-in voting rules, how they notify voters who submit deficient ballots, and whether they allow them to fix such errors. Each of the 50 U.S. states has a central election authority, but ballots are processed by dozens of separate county or municipal election offices within each state.

Reuters reviewed incident logs and other election records from Wisconsin’s April race. The news organization also examined data from election offices in North Carolina, Florida and Arizona containing the number of mail-in ballots rejected in recent elections in those presidential battlegrounds. Reuters also surveyed 36 election officials across the four states about how they processed mail-in ballots, notified voters who mailed deficient ballots, and enabled those voters to cast valid votes.

The records detailed more than 3 million mail ballots cast during the four states’ presidential nomination contests this year. The vast majority of those were accepted, but at least 25,000 mail-in ballots were rejected for violations of signature and witness requirements. Reuters could not follow up with all individuals whose ballots were rejected. Still, some trends emerged from the statewide data and interviews with dozens of voters and election officials.

Reuters found:

- Minorities, who tend to vote Democratic, are more likely than white voters to have their mail-in ballots rejected for signature and witness issues in North Carolina and Florida. Voter race data was unavailable in Arizona and Wisconsin.

- Procedures for handling deficient mail ballots differed, sometimes markedly, between election offices within each state; and election officials told Reuters of varying timetables and methods for notifying voters. Ballot designs also diverged, with signature boxes clearer on some than others.

- Geography and population size helped determine how easily election officials could contact voters about ballot deficiencies. Officials in small, compact jurisdictions tended to say they found it easier to notify voters than did their counterparts in larger communities, because they were more likely to know voters personally.
'VOTING WITHOUT A SAFETY NET'

U.S. mail-in voting surged in states that held presidential primaries after mid-March, when the COVID-19 pandemic exploded. Millions of Americans are projected to cast mail ballots for the first time this November, with coronavirus expected to drive record-high absentee turnout.

Slowed U.S. Postal Service deliveries this summer raised alarms about ballots arriving too late to be counted. But voters may not be aware of other potential pitfalls.

The uneven application of mail-in voting rules illegally disadvantages some voters, according to voting-rights advocates, who have sued to standardize the way local officials process absentee ballots, notify voters about errors and allow voters to fix them in the four states that Reuters examined. One lawsuit failed in September to eliminate Wisconsin’s witness requirement. Another successfully extended the period for Arizona voters to add signatures to unsigned ballots. Activists won settlements in two additional cases, one in Florida, the other in North Carolina, though they say those states have yet to comply fully.

For millions of U.S. voters, voting-rights advocates say, the odds of their mail-in ballot counting this November could come down to where they are registered to vote and how workers in their local election office implement their state’s voting rules.

"Mail-in voting is voting without a safety net," because voters are not present to resolve any issues that arise with their mail ballots, said David Becker, head of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research. That underscores why statewide rules "shouldn’t be applied differently county to county," he said.

Jason Snead, executive director at the conservative Honest Elections Project, said election officials should apply absentee ballot requirements as uniformly as possible. Still he said “absolute uniformity” goes against the U.S. tradition of running elections locally to provide “flexibility, responsiveness and direct accountability to voters.” He said voters need to know they must "follow every rule that is written out on that ballot, make sure that they've crossed every t, dotted every i.”

The stakes are high.

Trump won the White House in 2016 by a whisker. He lost the popular vote, but fewer than 80,000 votes in three crucial states, including Wisconsin, handed him an Electoral College victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Recent polls slightly favor Biden in Wisconsin, but he and Trump are neck-and-neck in Florida, Arizona and North Carolina.

The number of rejected mail ballots is almost certain to be higher in November than it was in this year’s primaries because of higher expected turnout, election experts said.

In North Carolina, for example, about 1% of voters cast mail ballots in the March 3 primary, before coronavirus swept the nation. That figure could soar close to 25% in November, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll of likely voters conducted earlier this month. About a third of voters in Florida expect to vote by mail, as do about two in five voters in Wisconsin and more than half in Arizona, other Reuters/Ipsos polls showed this month.

If officials in North Carolina and Florida alone toss out ballots in November at the rates they did in March, more than 75,000 voters could be disenfranchised, Reuters calculates. That figure assumes turnout matches 2016 levels, and that voters end up casting mail ballots at the levels they said they would in the polls.

TALE OF TWO BALLOTS

In the four battleground states, Reuters found examples of 24 voters whose ballots were rejected without their knowledge, because local authorities used different mail-in ballot counting processes or notification procedures than other localities in the same state. Election officials in almost every case claimed they had attempted to notify voters who cast deficient ballots and informed them how to cast a valid vote.

Wisconsin and North Carolina are among 11 U.S. states that require absentee ballot envelopes to be signed by a witness.

More than half of the 23,000 absentee ballots rejected in Wisconsin’s April 7 primary were thrown out for lacking a voter signature, witness information or both, according to state data. On April 2, a federal district judge in Wisconsin relaxed the witness requirement due to the pandemic. That ruling was overturned by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals the next day.

Election officials statewide applied the witness requirement in myriad ways, according to a Reuters analysis of incident logs and other public records from municipalities comprising about 80% of Wisconsin’s electorate.

In the eastern Wisconsin village of Waldo, home to around 500 people, Clerk-Treasurer Michelle Brecht noticed a dozen voters had omitted witness information on their mail ballots; witnesses must provide a signature and an address. Because Brecht knew almost everyone in town, she told Reuters, she contacted all affected voters and was able to help them fix their ballots.

In the western Wisconsin town of Pepin, meanwhile, ballots lacking voter signatures and witness information were among 143 mail votes counted, according to County Board of Canvassers’ minutes from the April primary. The minutes did not say how many mail ballots were deficient, but the board recommended “more training for election workers in the area of absentee ballot processing.”

Nancy Wolfe, town clerk of Pepin, whose population is a little more than 800 residents, said her staff had received additional training. She did not respond when asked specifically about the board’s claim that deficient absentee ballots were accepted in the April primary.

Some inconsistencies likely arose from confusion over the last-minute court rulings, according to Jay Heck, state director for Common Cause Wisconsin, a government watchdog group. The appeals court reversed the district court’s lifting of the witness requirement just days before the election, he noted, leaving election officials disoriented. Heck also pointed to Wisconsin’s “unusually decentralized” election administration system, in which 1,850 separate municipalities handle voter registration and absentee ballots.

North Carolina’s witness requirement is even stricter: Absentee voters had to find two witnesses for the March 3 primary. That tripped up retiree William Hearn. He told Reuters he only got one witness to sign his ballot envelope. (For the November presidential contest, North Carolina is allowing voters to secure a single witness.)

Hearn, 72, was one of at least 121 voters in Durham County and nearly 1,800 statewide who had mail-in ballots rejected for missing signature or witness information, according to a Reuters analysis of state election data.

Derek Bowens, director of the elections board of Durham County, which contains North Carolina’s fourth-largest city, Durham, said his office mailed a replacement ballot with a letter of explanation to Hearn on February 27, one day after receiving his incomplete ballot.

Hearn said he never received it and had no idea his original ballot had been rejected until notified in September by Reuters. “I have a very big problem with that,” Hearn said. A Biden supporter, he now fears his mail ballot could be rejected in November without his knowledge.

An hour south in Harnett County, Republican David Krachun, 57, forgot to sign his ballot in the March primary. In contrast to Durham, Harnett County voters who cast deficient ballots were notified twice by mail and as many times as necessary by phone, according to county elections director Claire Jones.

Of the 25 voters who had mail ballots rejected in Harnett County, which is largely Republican, seven eventually cast a ballot that counted, according to Jones; they included Krachun, who mailed in a second absentee ballot that was accepted. Harnett County's 28% "cure" rate was close to three times that of Durham County, a Democratic stronghold.

RACIAL DISPARITIES

Krachun is white, while Hearn, whose ballot was rejected, is Black.

During the March election in North Carolina, about 5% of all voters who returned mail ballots had them rejected for signature or witness issues and ended up not casting a vote that counted, state election records show. Broken down by race, about 8% of Black voters didn’t wind up casting a valid vote after their mail ballots were tossed compared to about 5% of white voters. Election officials interviewed by Reuters had no explanation for the disparity.

Florida counties also reject mail-in ballots at widely varying rates, and they reject Black and Hispanic voters at higher rates than white voters, according to University of Florida professor Daniel Smith.

Smith examined mail-in ballots in March’s presidential primary that were recorded as being delivered by Election Day. Out of those voters, 1.1% of Hispanics and 0.8% of Blacks had their ballots rejected, Smith found, compared with just 0.4% of whites.

Officials in six Florida counties where minorities were rejected at significantly higher rates than white voters said their offices applied the rules consistently and that racial and ethnic disparities must be due to factors outside their control.

“It's definitely not something purposely being done,” said Kari Ewalt, community relations manager for the supervisor of elections in Osceola County. Smith found that Hispanic voters there were more than twice as likely as white voters to have their ballots rejected.

One possible explanation is that many minority voters have little experience with mail voting. But Smith found that even accounting for that, Black and Hispanic voters were more likely to have their ballots rejected. The variation across Florida counties suggested “it can’t just be the individual’s fault,” Smith said.

Disparities could arise from officials in some election offices being stricter when scrutinizing a voter’s signature, Smith said. The design of the ballot return envelope, and how quickly officials process ballots and flag problems to voters, are also potential factors, he said.

NO STANDARD PROCESS

Local election officials in all four states have considerable leeway in how they process mail-in ballots and respond to errors.

In Florida, officials must contact voters whose ballots lack signatures and offer them a chance to confirm their identities with an affidavit, which can be returned up to two days after the polls close. But there is no set prescription for how to do that. Some election offices first try to call the voter, others first put the affidavit in the mail. Others said they primarily use email.

In North Carolina, a Reuters survey of 20 counties revealed similar differences. In rural Lee County, Karen Marosites, deputy director of elections, said it sometimes took eight days to notify a voter of a deficient mail-in ballot.

In response to a lawsuit brought by groups including the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, a civil rights organization, a federal judge in North Carolina in August ordered the state elections board to publish statewide guidance that would bring the state’s 100 counties into alignment.

Coalition attorneys said the resulting guidance, released September 22, was an improvement but still lacked clarity on how counties would help voters cure deficient ballots. The North Carolina elections board did not respond to requests for comment.

In Wisconsin, a federal district judge in September upheld Wisconsin’s witness requirement after the Democratic National Committee sued to remove it due to the pandemic.

In Arizona, another lawsuit filed by the Democratic Party this year prompted the state’s 15 counties to standardize how mail-in voters could fix signature issues, giving them five business days after Election Day to cure unsigned ballots and mismatched signatures. But officials still have significant leeway in contacting voters.

Pima County, Arizona’s second-largest, mails replacement ballots only to voters whose unsigned ballots arrive more than a week before Election Day. Rural Apache County, meanwhile, notifies such voters via phone, email and U.S. mail, and follows up at least twice with phone and email if needed -- in addition to sending back the unsigned ballot if there is enough time for voters to sign and return it. “We have had people call us mad that we are ‘spamming’ them,” said Apache County Chief Deputy Recorder Bowen Udall.

Alex Gulotta, the Arizona state director of All Voting is Local, a voting-rights group, said such differences can determine whether votes count - or not.

“There shouldn’t even be a possibility for that much variance to exist between the counties,” Gulotta said.

Denmarkian: Democrats say there is not one problem with mail-in ballots... yes they are right not one but many problems with mail-in ballots take a look at the article before this post

Denmarkian: Joe Biden Has Napped for 1/3 of September… But He’s Fine!
https://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/joe-biden-has-napped-for-1-3-of-september-but-hes-fine/



If you think that Hillary Clinton ran one of the worst and most incompetent presidential campaigns in American history in 2016, you should check out Joe Biden’s 2020 No Malarkey tour! It’s pretty incredible. For the first time since we’ve had televised presidential campaigns, the Democrat candidate is practically nowhere to be seen. But he’s fine. He’s FINE! Nothing wrong there! Joe Biden is a spring chicken, why… he’s as fit as the veritable fiddle! In fact, Biden’s November victory is so assured that he has now taken one-third of the month of September off.

In a presidential election, there’s a pool of reporters assigned to cover each campaign. It makes things easier for the Secret Service and safer for the candidates that way, because the same reporters are covering the campaign every day. This is normally a grueling job for the Labor Day to Election Day stretch. Those reporters are on the road or in the air every single day for more than two months, as the candidates run a sprinting marathon to the finish line.

It’s a sadistic grind, but eventually every candidate will need to take off a day as they fly across the country and try to hit as many states as possible to reach their base. When a day is taken off, a campaign staffer informs the pool of reporters that they are “calling a lid” for the day. The expression means there will be no campaign events or appearances to cover.

Covering the No Malarkey campaign of 2020 hasn’t been grueling for the pool reporters, however. They’ve had a lot of days off in September. In the first 22 days of September, here are the days when the Biden campaign “called a lid:”

September 1, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 19 and 22.

If you work a 40-hour-a-week job and even if you took Labor Day off, you’ve still worked more days in September than Joe Biden and the pool of reporters covering his campaign. He’s literally had to take 1/3 of the month off to rest in his basement. Biden had to take a three-day weekend to recover from his appearances at the September 11 remembrances.




In the most recent ten days in September, in which Joe Biden took five days off to rest, President Donald Trump has held in-person campaign rallies in Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota and North Carolina. He also toured wildfire damage in California, gave a speech at the National Republican Congressional Committee Battleground Dinner, participated in an ABC News town hall, and hosted a signing ceremony at the White House for three separate international peace agreements that he brokered.

Here’s how Joe Biden recited the Pledge of Allegiance yesterday:

“I pledge allegiance to the United States of America, one nation, indivisible, under God, for real.”

That’s… not even close enough for Army work or horseshoes. To his credit, Biden didn’t say that we are one nation under, “you know, the thing,” but that is still incredibly bad. Biden was so worn out by botching the pledge that the campaign had to call a lid and take the very next day off.

Oh, and by the way, on the day when Joe Biden was botching the Pledge of Allegiance, the President of South Korea called for an official end to the Korean War after more than 70 years and is calling for denuclearization talks on the Korean Peninsula. Guess who facilitated that while still maintaining a grueling presidential campaign schedule?

Remember when the media was telling us that Kim Jong Un was dead and Trump said, “No he’s not?” Now we know why Trump knew that for a fact – because he was talking to the Little Rocket Man again.

You can already imagine the headlines, if the media even bothers to cover this amazing development:

“Murderous Dictator Kim Jong Un Meddles in Election Help Trump!”

But don’t you worry. Joe Biden is fine! Nothing wrong with him!

In less than a week, Joe Biden is allegedly going to participate in the first presidential debate this year against Donald Trump. Biden could not recite the Pledge of Allegiance the other day, and he took the following day off.

If Biden bails on the first debate, what’s the excuse going to be then? At this point, it looks like a near guarantee that Biden won’t be able to make it through a debate. It would be too catastrophic for an already Low Energy campaign. He’s damned if he debates and he’s damned if he bails. The clock is ticking. What do you think he’s going to do? Will Biden show up, or will he hide in the basement?

Denmarkian: Trump is a competent President

Biden is an incompetent fool

Denmarkian: Trump Supporters Home TORCHED by BLM Arsonists and Biden Supporters
https://www.patrioticviralnews.com/articles/trump-supporters-home-torched-by-blm-arsonists-and-biden-supporters/

Civil war isn’t pending. We’re not at the cusp. We are far over the precipice. We’ve actually been at war for months now. In case you missed it, BLM terrorists have been attacking innocent Americans across the country for months.

No, this war doesn’t have armed men lining up in battlefields. It’s a modern war. It is asymmetric, and that makes it all the harder. Lest you harbor doubt, consider how many people have been attacked in the riots so far this summer. Dozens are dead. Thousands have been wounded. The property damage is in the billions of dollars. All of this came after politicians committed to sweeping police reform. They got what they wanted and set fire to the country all the same.

The goal is not reform. The goal is to destroy America, and you are sadly mistaken if you think they will shy away from murdering you to meet that goal.




The only thing standing in the way of the violent revolutionaries is the will of the majority. They are using terror and violence to try to break that will. It’s why they are assassinating police and civilians in the street. It’s why a mob tried to murder a kit in Wisconsin, and it’s why they just torched a home for flying a Trump 2020 flag.

We have to follow the stories. We have to track the asymmetric attacks. Then, we have to hold these monsters accountable. Let this video scare and motivate you. Don’t let the terrorists hide behind their cohorts in the media and political positions. This. Must. Stop.

Denmarkian: Here’s How Joe Biden is Cheating (And It’s Not a Teleprompter)
https://www.leagueofpower.com/heres-how-joe-biden-is-cheating-and-its-not-a-teleprompter/

Color me surprised. I’ve been predicting for months now that Joe Biden would bail out on the debates, due to his inability to string two sentences together without a teleprompter. But it now looks like Biden will attend the first debate tomorrow night. His team has figured out a technological workaround to help control him in public appearances and keep up the charade that Biden has most of his faculties.

After all the years that I worked in TV news, I’m kind of kicking myself that I didn’t spot this trick earlier. Keep in mind that Democrats are willing to do just about anything to cheat in a presidential election. This includes grade-school level cheating, such as then DNC head honcho Donna Brazile handing CNN’s debate questions to Hillary Clinton prior to the debate. But it also includes much more sophisticated, technological methods.

Think back to the first debate in 2016 between Trump and Crooked Hillary. That’s the debate where she wore the red pantsuit that she stole from Kim Jong Un’s wardrobe. Literally everyone on the right noticed the square box under Hillary’s jacket that was taped to her back, and the wires running up toward her head.

The device sparked a lot of theories about what it was, with some thinking it was some type of medical device to control Hillary’s seizures. But having worked in TV for so many years, I instantly recognized it, because I used to wear one at work every day. It was a power source and wireless receiver for Hillary’s IFB (her earpiece). Someone within close enough proximity was able to relay information to Hillary during the debates to make it look like she just has so many obscure facts and figures floating around in her big brain.

The funny thing is: Trump knew. If you re-watch that first debate, when Trump shakes Hillary’s hand at the very beginning, he reaches over with his left hand and taps Hillary on the back – directly on the wires. He was signaling to her, “I know you’re cheating, you wretched villain, but I’m going to beat you anyway.”






After that first debate, the media went out of its way to not do any close-ups on Hillary from behind, because everyone knew she was wearing a gadget to help her cheat.

Fast forward to 2020, and here is how Joe Biden’s team plans to cheat. They’ve already tested this method out in several public appearances. Is Joe Biden using a teleprompter part of the time? Yes, absolutely. We’ve all seen it. He’s using handwritten notes, a teleprompter, his computer screen and any other resource they can to prop him up and make it look like he’s not a really old man with really bad Alzheimer’s.

But this… this is an inspired piece of evil genius. This is going to sound like something out of a science fiction movie but bear with me. This is totally real, and I’ll prove it to you.

Joe Biden has a medical device implanted in his skull.

It’s called the Esteem Hearing Implant which you can learn about HERE. It’s an implant that goes into the skull above the ear and it has two micro-wire probes that are injected into the nerves inside the ear canal. It’s FDA-approved and it uses bone conduction to enhance hearing (sound waves vibrate off the bones of the skull, and the wire probes send the signal directly into the ear, basically). It’s wireless and it’s controlled by the push of a button, so the user can turn it on and off with a little device… that fits in your pocket.

And that’s how the experts at Bombards Body Language spotted this trick. Joe Biden gets really addled during unscripted, public appearances and interviews. It happened during the CNN Town Hall recently. When someone starts talking to Joe Biden, there are times when he gets that “addled old man” expression of sheer terror and confusion on his face. He’s totally lost and doesn’t have a clue where he is or what’s happening.

But then – every single time – Joe Biden does what he’s been trained to do in these situations. His right hand goes into his pocket. Then he smiles that big Joe Biden politician smile that we all recognize after 47 years of this guy being in office. Then he answers the question.

When Joe Biden gets confused, he reaches into his pocket and turns on the implant. Whoever is talking to him on the other end instructs him to smile and then starts relaying answers to him until he gets back on track. Joe hears it because the implant receives a wireless signal and vibrates the bones in his skull.

The body language experts have also noticed that whenever Biden is receiving instructions through the implant, he cannot make eye contact with the person asking him a question. This is a natural response. Even a young, healthy and spry young mind like Donald Trump’s cannot receive communication input from two sources at once. Joe Biden has to look away from the speaker in order to listen to his handlers, which is why he always looks down when he’s being asked a question. He’s not thinking or listening intently; he’s receiving instructions from his handlers on which set of talking points to rattle off.

Now we know. And now you know what to watch for during the debates. If Joe Biden looks terrorized and completely lost and confused, he’ll reach into his pocket to turn on his skull implant and then he’ll smile. Every time. We also know why Joe Biden completely vanished from the campaign trail during July. He wasn’t just hiding in his basement. He was getting his implant installed and recovering from surgery.

Denmarkian: An Immigrant’s Love Letter to America
https://amgreatness.com/2020/09/25/an-immigrants-love-letter-to-america/



I now look at the American flag and my heart bursts with pride. The story of this country and its founding is a miracle. Not everyone who emigrates here feels the same way.
By Roxanne Beckford Hoge • September 25, 2020

America, we need to talk.

I was born in paradise, on the beautiful island of Jamaica. I was born a British subject, and Her Royal Highness Queen Elizabeth II was the ultimate head of my church and state. Because I was brought up speaking the Queen’s English, and was a bookish kid to boot, words have always mattered to me. Conflating similar yet different terms may win you cheap rhetorical points, but it really ticks off this grammar nerd.

People who say “immigrant” without specifying legal or illegal aren’t arguing for a distinction without a difference; they’re trying to trick you into believing something that’s just not true.

America was always a glamorous plane ride away from my young life in Kingston. The United States was a land of plenty. It’s where we flew to shop for toys and fabric to make our clothes. To my 11-year-old self, Americans chewed gum and spoke with a funny twang, and pointed out the overhead compartments and emergency exits. I loved imitating them, but never imagined I could become one of them.

One day, my paradise crumbled. Mobs ruled the streets and terrified the adults, and America became the emergency exit for my family. We had to leave so much behind. It was a strange time to parachute into 7th grade at St. Rose of Lima School—where I had to diagram sentences and stop putting the letter “u” in color and honor.

To add to the discomfort of showing up as one of the very few non-Catholic kids in the middle of the school year, and not knowing the Pledge of Allegiance and being terrified the nuns would find out, on my first day of school I raised my hand to ask an innocent question that made sense in English English, but turned out to be rather awkward phrasing in American English: “Excuse me, does anyone have a rubber I can borrow?” (It means “eraser” in British English.) Those synonyms turn out to have distinctly different meanings in and out of the Commonwealth.

Awkward. But I learned.
But this is also why I, and many legal immigrants, have our hackles raised by the facile substitution of “immigrant” to cover both resident and illegal aliens.

The movement that almost broke my country and added to the Jamaican diaspora was Democratic Socialism, which has failed everywhere it’s been tried. It drove us out of paradise. At the end of the day, mob rule is incompatible with idyll. My family landed as Green Card holders (the colloquial term for resident aliens) in the United States of America in 1976—the bicentennial year—and red, white, and blue was everywhere.

Providing a pathway to citizenship to someone whose very first act upon stepping on American soil was to break the law is like setting up a pathway to homeownership for the lovely couple who broke into your house.

America isn’t for everyone. I didn’t fall in love with her right away, Bicentennial fireworks notwithstanding. The freedom to choose your own path is liberating . . . and scary. The responsibility to improve the lives around you is enlightening; and sobering. The right to speak freely is exhilarating, and makes you vulnerable.

Over time, I learned that America always picks herself up, dusts herself off, and reaches out a hand to help the other player off the floor. When tragedy strikes anywhere in the world, Americans open their hearts and their wallets and are at the ready to board a plane to help.

I now look at the American flag and my heart bursts with pride. The story of this country and its founding is a miracle. And so, at the turn of the century, I became an American citizen. I am no longer a subject. I took an oath “that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”

Not everyone who emigrates here feels the same way. Some arrivals are purely transactional in nature—“give me a safe place to stay and I’ll pay taxes and behave but I’m not falling in love with you.” That’s OK. It’s why the law provides for resident aliens to come to the country and participate in her freedoms without taking the ultimate step of becoming citizens.

Which is why people who arrive without bothering to even fill out a form or come through a legal point of entry are doing the wrong thing. Tossing citizenship around like Halloween candy is grossly offensive to those of us who jumped through all the hoops, waited in all the lines, and took all the tests.

I can understand the impetus to want to help everyone—it’s very American, after all. But providing a pathway to citizenship to someone whose very first act upon stepping on American soil was to break the law is like setting up a pathway to homeownership for the lovely couple who broke into your house. Words matter.

Americans, like no other people in the world, can do and be anything. There’s no caste system here. You can start at the bottom and work your way to the top and vice versa. Even better, you get to choose what is top and bottom for you. You get to spend your treasure and your time however you want. From Figure 8 races and demolition derbies in Jackson Hole, to swimming with dolphins in Key West, you get to do you. I’ve gone from a scared new immigrant who didn’t know that Americans had different words for things like erasers to a college graduate to a corporate event planner to a working actress to a mother of four and a one-time political candidate.

I love America and its miraculous founding, and every day I see people claiming that this country isn’t that great. Clearly, lots of you don’t know how good you have it. Robby Starbuck is a friend and filmmaker who also rejects what he calls “linguistic tricks” and who, as a Cuban American, appreciates and loves this country. He produced a love letter which his talented musician wife, Matriarch, did the music for and our fervent hope is that it reminds us all what this country is really all about.



There’s only one thing I can’t be as a naturalized American citizen. I can’t be president. But I sure can be a participant. As I eventually learned to say every morning at St. Rose of Lima, “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” Watch this love letter, and then please participate—peacefully—in the electoral process.

May God continue to bless the United States of America.

[i] Rubber, n. Eraser. Item to rub out one’s written mistakes.

Denmarkian: DOJ Identifies Cities Across the US on the Naughty List
https://patriotsofamerica.com/doj-identifies-cities-across-the-us-on-the-naughty-list/

President Trump wants a list of the naughty cities – the ones that are allowing anarchy and violence to disrupt the lives of everyday citizens. It’s time to get serious about what’s happening in the country – and too many Democratic cities have been allowing the violence to continue.

The Democratic governors and mayors turn a blind eye. Violence? What violence? Enough is enough – and Trump has issued a Presidential Memorandum for the Department of Justice to identify the cities that are sitting back and doing nothing. Those that are on the list may cease to receive federal funding.

It’s simple. Do your job and you get federal funding. Continue to spit in the face of the federal government while you allow cities to fall apart and you don’t get federal funding. It’s the only way to get the Democratic leaders to take notice and put an end to all of the mindless violence.

The sad part about so much of it is that the police have been living up to their end. They’re making the arrests. They’re risking their lives on a daily basis. All it takes is a liberal District Attorney to dismiss the charges, sending the criminals back on the street the next day. That means that there’s no deterrent for the violent protesters any longer. If they get arrested, they know that the DA has their back and will release them.

Part of the memorandum explained that “without law and order, democracy cannot function.” It’s no longer about allowing Americans to peacefully protest. When property is being destroyed and innocent citizens are being either injured or killed, it’s no longer peaceful. And there are too many cities and states that are achieving anarchy.

So, it’s time to hold those local governments responsible. Everyone wants to point the finger and blame Trump for not doing anything, so he’s doing something – but the Dems are going to have to step up to do their job. Otherwise, he’ll cut their funding.

A number of cities have been identified by the DOJ for being in trouble, including New York City, Portland, and Seattle. If the cities marked for possible defunding don’t act, they’ll be subject to having funds withdrawn. The list will be regularly updated. Cities can move on and off of the list based on the actions that they take.

The criteria for being on the list is straightforward.

Is the jurisdiction forbidding the police force to intervene to restore order?

Has the jurisdiction withdrawn law enforcement protection from a specific are?

Have police departments been defunded or disempowered?

Has the jurisdiction unreasonably refused to accept law enforcement help from the federal government?

Additionally, a city can also manage to get onto the list based on any other factors that the Attorney General deems appropriate.

It’s easy to see how New York City, Portland, and Seattle have made the list. They’ve seen an increase in shootings, mayors and governors have rejected federal assistance, and the police departments are being disempowered.

There. Trump is doing his job. As too many Dems say that Trump is why the violence is happening, he’s stepping up to see to it that the cities clean up their act. He’s offered a lending hand to send in extra law enforcement. There’s nothing else that he can do, especially when the mayors and governors scream for Trump not to visit.

Now, it’s all a matter of watching how the Democratic leaders jump to defend the mayors and governors within the troubled cities. They’ll continue to defend the destruction and violence rather than siding with the president.

The harsh reality is that the Dems need violence and destruction because they believe that it hurts Trump. They believe that violence is the only way for them to win the election. However, the only one moving to truly protect the citizens in these troubled areas is Trump and the rest of the GOP.

Fractured fairy tale: Murrayduan , Is a Fraud, Like Colin Kapernick forget about them , Daddy has to do every thing for people like that

Fractured fairy tale:

Fractured fairy tale:

Fractured fairy tale:

Fractured fairy tale:

Fractured fairy tale:

Denmarkian: AOC Admits That Biden Is Nothing More than a Trojan Horse
https://yourdutytoamerica.com/aoc-admits-that-biden-is-nothing-more-than-a-trojan-horse/



Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez let the cat out of the bag when she recently talked about Biden. She confirmed what many of us already knew. Biden is a figurehead…a Trojan horse. He looks good on the ballots because he has the political experience. He served alongside Obama. He’s easier to get into the White House than some of the more radical choices that are out there.

“We can continue to push Vice President Biden on issues from marijuana to climate change to foreign policy.” She goes on to talk about how it’s important that they continue to fight for a progressive agenda.

Essentially, AOC believes that Biden is a pawn that they can just push in the direction they want him. He’s not capable of making any strong decisions for himself. As such, he’s just a placeholder for the presidency until they can get someone even better into that position.

She has also called Biden a good “transition figure.” Other advisers on Capitol Hill have said that Biden is already looking at a running mate that he can turn things over to after four years.” That would be Harris – and if the Dems get their way, it will be a lot sooner than four years.

Biden has all but made a four-year pledge. He’s planning to run for one term – though he won’t come out and say it. He’s already 77-years-old. He’s a career politician. Planning for a second term at the age of 81 would be ridiculous – he knows it and his party knows it, too.

AOC has said that there are issues she fundamentally disagrees with Biden on. However, she feels that he is capable of being pushed to a more progressive view on a number of topics, including foreign policy and immigration.

This is the problem, though. The Democratic Party would love to promote Biden as someone who is progressive but he’s not. If he is as progressive as they claim that he is, then AOC wouldn’t be giving an interview on how they fundamentally disagree and that he needs to be given a push.

Just a few weeks ago, Biden said in an interview that he’s a “Constitutionalist.” That’s probably the last thing the Democrats wanted to hear. Most constitutionalists are Republican. It comes back to the notion that Biden doesn’t even know who he is anymore.

It doesn’t matter, though. The Dems are looking to get a victory in November so that they can get Trump out of the way.

AOC was brutally honest when she talked about where she’d like to see the country headed. “I’d love to have an election this year for the next generation of leaders, but if I have to wait four years to get rid of Trump, I’m willing to do it.”

She wanted Bernie Sanders. She was prepared to stand behind Sanders and promote the socialist agenda all the way. Unfortunately for her, Sanders stepped down from his campaign. When the primaries were all over with, the only one left standing was Biden.

So, she’ll take Biden because it’s better than keeping Trump in the office for another four years. She’ll continue to push Biden closer to the progressive agenda that she has because she believes that he’s a pushover – and she’s likely right. Then, once Biden has assumed the office, they’ll work on a more progressive candidate. And that will be so that she can see the “next generation of leaders.”

This is why it’s dangerous to vote for the Democratic Party. They have fundamentally different ideas. They see nothing wrong with voting in a figurehead as opposed to a capable candidate. They’ll simply use Biden as a puppet to do their bidding since they were unable to get the candidate that they really wanted.

A vote for the Democratic Party is a vote for Harris and a more progressive agenda. They’ll have Biden out in no time, and AOC has said it herself.

Denmarkian: as I figured Biden is only a puppet to the democrats

Denmarkian: If Hillary and AOC Can Vote in Person, So Should You!
https://retiredpatriotnews.com/2020/09/28/if-hillary-and-aoc-can-vote-in-person-so-should-you/

ith the general election right around the corner now, everyone is talking about voting. But it’s not who they will be voting for that dominates most of the conversations of late. It’s how they will be voting…

As usual, there are several different ways to cast your ballot. Of course, there is the traditional in-person, at the polls option, mail-in voting for those older than 65 in most states, and absentee ballots for when you will not be in your home state or voting district at the time of the election.

In the past, the first option was by far the most popular, giving people the age-old physical experience of voting with their peers. However, in recent months and due to the novel coronavirus pandemic that so abruptly seemed to attack our population, in-person voting has been touted as somewhat dangerous, if not wholly irresponsible by the political left.

And so the other two options have been given much more consideration.

However, as many Republicans have pointed out, there are severe problems with these methods and ones that will take much longer than just a few months to work out.

But the Democrats are persistent that mail-in voting, by and large, is the best way to go.

They have pushed this so much so that most states have, in fact, changed their voting laws this year, if only temporarily, to make mail-in/absentee voting more readily available to people everywhere. And Democratic leaders like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have been insistent that this needs to be the case on a federal level.

Because you know, standing in line for a while as you do at the grocery store each week is highly dangerous and likely to start another outbreak of the dreaded virus.

Meanwhile, not so “peaceful” protests – attended by the hundreds – high-profile funerals, and riots are deemed completely safe.

I know it doesn’t exactly make much sense.

Then again, neither does the fact that some of the most high-profile Democrats in the nation have recently announced that they will vote in person.

Take New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for example.
The self-described democratic socialist tweeted out this past weekend, “I am voting early and in person. What’s your voting plan?”

Now, as AOC is relatively young still and in good health, she likely has little to fear from attending the polls in person, even if she were to contract the novel disease. Plus, as one of the most liberal lawmakers in Congress, she tends to have a flair for both the dramatic and the rebellious, as in-person voting has recently been labeled.

But it still begs the question of why? Why, after screaming about people being able to vote by mail en masse for so long, do you suddenly decide to do the opposite?

Well, it’s probably for the same reason that Hillary Clinton just announced the same.

In response to AOC’s tweet, Clinton said nearly the exact same thing.
“I am voting early, in person, too. What’s your voting plan?

Unlike AOC, Hillary isn’t youthful in the least, nor, as a longtime part of the establishment government, can we say that she is prone to any “rebellious” tendencies.

So, pray tell, why are these Democratic elites going to the polls in person?
I have a couple of ideas.

One is that, as high-profile politicians, they simply want a photo op, one that they would miss, should they vote by mail, after all, this is what Biden did when he voted for the primaries in person last week in his home state of Delaware.

However, it could be that the GOP’s allegations of fraud and logistical errors are, in fact, true. And, as such, these women want to make sure their vote is actually counted. After all, this is likely the most crucial election they have ever voted in.

Then again, it could that these two, like most other Democrats, are of the mind that rules shouldn’t apply to them as they do to everyone else. You know, the whole ‘rules for thee, not for me’ mentality that politicians like Pelosi and Democratic NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio have?

But like both Joe Biden and President Trump have stated, if leaders like this can do it, everyone should be able to.

Denmarkian: oh yes these democrats are so afraid that their mail-in ballots will not be counted so they have voted in Person

Fractured fairy tale:

Denmarkian: CNN asks Democratic senator to explain how nomination of Amy Coney Barrett is ‘illegal or illegitimate.’ He can’t.
https://patriots4life.com/cnn-asks-democratic-senator-to-explain-how-nomination-of-amy-coney-barrett-is-illegal-or-illegitimate-he-cant

Immediately after President Donald Trump announced his selection of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to serve on the Supreme Court, Democratic senators began declaring the nomination “illegitimate.”

One of the loudest voices was Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will be holding hearings next month on the Barrett nomination.

Blumenthal tweeted minutes after Trump’s announcement that the entire process was an “illegitimate sham” and went on to blast Barrett’s qualifications.

Blumenthal’s Twitter thread rant concluded with the senator saying he would refuse to meet with the nominee — despite decades of Senate tradition of senators of both parties meeting with nominees to the high court — and that he would not “treat the process as legitimate.”
The Gov’t’s Actions Have Gone Beyond Anything I Imagined!



Later Saturday, Blumenthal was interviewed on CNN by Wolf Blitzer and was actually confronted over his comments and asked to explain how the nomination was “illegal or illegitimate.”

He couldn’t give a straight answer.
CNN asked hard questions?

During his CNN interview, Blumenthal repeatedly returned to his claim that the nomination is “illegitimate” and a “sham.”

Following Blumenthal’s opening diatribe, Blitzer repeatedly asked the senator to explain exactly how the nomination is “illegal or illegitimate,” but the lawmaker had no straight answer.

“What are the Republicans doing that is illegal or illegitimate?” Blitzer asked, adding a note that the Constitution delineates exactly how nominations to the court are supposed to go down.

“The Constitution says the president has to nominate Supreme Court justices; the Senate has to advise and consent and confirm,” Blitzer continued. “So what what is illegal about what the president and the Republicans are doing? You say it’s illegitimate.”

Blumenthal danced around the question and claimed it is illegitimate because of the timing of the nomination, noting that “the vote on this nominee will occur literally at the end of October, a handful of days before an election.”

Blitzer wasn’t satisfied with the senator’s answer and pressed again.

“Where does it say that’s illegitimate in the U.S. Constitution or in the law?” the newsman asked. “Where does it say that what they’re doing … is illegal?”

Blumenthal was forced to admit that nothing the Republicans were doing was “illegal” or “illegitimate” under the Constitution.

But never mind that — the Republicans, he claimed, were violating the “unwritten rules.”

“Illegal it may be not under the Constitution,” the Connecticut senator stated. “Under the norms and traditions and unwritten rules of the Senate, it is illegitimate.”
An admission

Blitzer eventually forced Blumenthal to concede that, indeed, there’s nothing illegal or actually illegitimate about the Barrett nomination.

“What I hear you saying, Sen. Blumenthal, it may be inappropriate, it may be wrong — especially so close to an election — but you agree that there’s nothing illegal or totally illegitimate as to what they’re doing,” Blitzer said.

“It may not violate the letter of the Constitution,” Blumenthal admitted. “It violates the spirit of the Constitution.”

Denmarkian: yes the Republicans will do thing legally but the democrats love to do thing illegally such as the Impeachment of Trump that was totally illegal and was so much full of lies from Pelosi and Schiff

Denmarkian: Joe Biden Called Troops “Dull” and “Slow”–Should We Give Him a Pass?
https://www.patrioticviralnews.com/articles/joe-biden-called-troops-dull-and-slow-should-we-give-him-a-pass/

A video has surfaced of Joe Biden calling US soldiers a variety of insulting names in 2017. This is not a rumor based on “anonymous sources.” There’s video.

Biden was giving a speech when he stated, “I appointed Johnson [an officer who was on stage with Biden] to the academy. I just want you to know that. Clap for that, you stupid bastards. (Feeble applause.) Come on, man. Man, you are a dull bunch. Must be slow here, man.”

Joe Biden made nasty comments about active duty soldiers overseas, to their faces, in a room full of people. Yet the media sniffs that this is “not a story” or “not newsworthy.”

It seems like it was only yesterday when the mainstream media spent two full weeks fluffing up a fake news story from The Atlantic about President Trump dissing the troops. Four “anonymous sources” claimed that Trump didn’t want to get his hair wet at a military ceremony overseas, and while complaining and whining, Trump called America’s fallen war dead “losers” and “suckers.”



The press ignored certain problems with the story. There was no video of Trump saying any such thing. Plus, every single person who was with President Trump at the time refuted the story. Even the fired and disgraced warmonger John Bolton, who has every reason to lie about Trump in order to sell more copies of his anti-Trump book that just came out, said the story was a complete and total lie.

Was President Trump given the benefit of the doubt at any time, despite the media producing no evidence that the story was true?

Then why should we give Joe Biden the benefit of the doubt that he was joking when he called the troops “stupid bastards?”

But don’t take my word for it. Watch the video of Biden making these nasty comments and judge for yourself if we the voters should move on and forgive him like the media wants us to.

Denmarkian: How Did We Ever Live Like This Under Obama-Biden?
https://www.factsnotmemes.com/articles/how-did-we-ever-live-like-this-under-obama-biden

https://www.factsnotmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/when-biden-was-in-office-e1601379875450.jpg


Hey, remember this? Yeah… not good times. It’s a miracle that we weren’t all out in the streets with pitchforks and torches when the Barack Obama-Joe Biden administration was mismanaging the economy so badly.

If you want to understand all the intricacies of our modern advanced economy and how the price of gas can now be half of what it cost under Obama-Biden, we can explain it in just three words: President. Donald. Trump!

For the first time in what might as well be eternity, America is now energy independent thanks to fracking and President Donald Trump. We don’t have to slink off to the Middle East with our hands out – beggar style – to purchase oil from countries that hate us.

We love this meme because it’s really important to think back and remember just how bad things were in America under Obama and Biden’s crippling “climate warrior” policies. Do you think the people manhandling the Biden meat puppet in the basement are looking forward to forcing the price of gas up above $5 again? Oh, you can bet they are!