conversation with a trump supporter: 1 (Page 2) theHating: oh well, i can summarize he asked me first if i thought some races were better than others. just like that, super vanilla and racey. i told him no and it doesnt surprise me that such a question is on his mind. then he tried to say i was wrong and re-framed the question asking if i think some cultures are better than others. again, i told him no and that he needed to go look up some history and also the definition of racism and discrimination and prejudice. i do actually have that convo theHating: ehartshorn77: You have no thoughts on good cultures and barbarous ones. What a a culture that develops Africa,and the other culture that thinks global warming is for real. 3 days ago theHating theHating: i think you ate too many red candles 2 days ago ehartshorn77 ehartshorn77: Are certain cultures more capable of advancing further cultures? I like blue m and ms and brown ones. 2 days ago ehartshorn77 ehartshorn77: Do you understand what I am talking about when I say certain cultures are more superior than others. Some cultures are meant to take on the advances of other cultures. Europe has chose to conquer. Can we blame them for reshaping the continent of Europe so many times. 2 days ago theHating theHating: i think you should fact check all your own claims before taking them at face value from your revised historical contexts theHating: thats why i compared him to Kanye West, who apparently thinks bush doesnt care about black culture but trump certainly does??? theHating: absolutely floored by this stuff, how can people look in a mirror and read so much about so little? theHating: ehartshorn77: Is that all you can say you left out Lyndon LaRouche. I am an Old Henry Clay Whig Tariff Whig. Wow you, really sure know how to do intelligence. All you have to say about me is that I am a Trump supporter? Is that all you can say? Then you see cultures as races. No, no. Cultures are a people. Ethnicities, can change cultures. Countries can change culture. Look at China under the cultural Revolution. China under the gang of four was a disaster,and China under his Excellency Deng Xiaoping had a better culture. Deng his excellency chose Jiang Zemin. Deng His excellency took China on a path to success this led to what China was doing in the 21 st century. Three Gorges Dam, Development of High Speed Rail, their ambitious space program, and the New Silk Road, that you slander. I told you the New Silk Road was the idea of LaRouche and you still do not see the significance of it. What makes you different from John Bolton, and the Vice President? What makes you different from the British house of commons? 6 hours ago ehartshorn77 ehartshorn77: Will you ever learn about Henry Carey, but you need a high view of man or to be evil as Betrand Russel to see how bad ass is Henry Carey. 5 hours ago ehartshorn77 ehartshorn77: Hmm, all the leads I gave you and you and you produce fake news. A Trump supporter. FDR democrat, Old Henry Clay Tariff Whig am I yet you disregard. You dishonor dead white men too much. 5 hours ago theHating: he dropped this on me at 1am, and then blocked me... presumably because he cant handle critical analysis of his larouche-british conspiracy theory, which i can debunk in literally one single sentence. gotta love this brand of flat earth logic. well, im gunna go watch some alex jones and hate on global separatists in the house of commons while endorsing vague democratic values theHating: sorry, ehart, henry carey and lyndon larouche are not my heroes of economic principle and social justice, maybe if i were a fan of commitment to premature philosophy, but you have only convinced me that you are just as compartmentalized as any other trump supporter. i do gotta say, just when you think you have heard it all, suddenly you are being told that the british lobbying groups are pushing globalization on the world. which is a farce and a way of distracting national table-talks to a made up conspiracy instead of spending that energy talking about real issues that are actually based in reality. again, when you claim Brittain influences globalism in american discourse, all i can do is laugh at the idea of a toddler telling a room full of Rockefellers what to do with their capital... theHating: basically like the 9/11 conspiracy theories, some people cant get a grip on reality and make themselves easy targets for american public relations to compartmentalize their minds even more. bring me your haters, im only here to mock because money is just not valuable enough to compel me to educate any convocation of disillusioned people. develop your social wealth before you tell me to trade in mine for material poverty... (Edited by theHating) theHating: ehart = a known bigot winner of all debates in the 16th century of british imperialism and colonization  hoboba: I wouldnt worry about Ehart too much, I saw him in the politics room. He doesnt make sense. I think he has some learning issues, I will put it. He is on disability for that reason. And he admits it. Hard to take him seriously. theHating: well, then im glad i took it it easy on him some of these people i mock are mentally handicapped, it is something i struggle to identify, but at the same time i always consider it. but at the same time, i find that mocking people for marginalizing popular issues in america is the quickest way to get them to the end of their ropes. in the case with this particular individual, i needed to see ehart dish it out, so to speak, and its funny that he deleted all those insults towards squirrel and then thought i didnt see any of it... plus all his bizarre 16th century sentiments and an unfounded conspiracy theory about british meddling made him an easy target, much like flat earthers or alex jones subscribers. and so reactionary political theater continues on without any such input from britain, which now succumbs to their own seperatist, nationalism movements. and through out all these conspiracy theories, one thing i would point out is how the nationalists are really no different from the neo-con revisionists in the aspect that both pools of thought are funded by billionaires and promote corporate ideals by passing off psuedo-intellectualism as a benevolent cause. yes, indeed, my dear trumpist, you really do need a high IQ to understand jordan peterson and candice owens and how they are fabricating history to affect current sentiment on discrimination policies. so, my question to ehart and his nationalist LPAC liberals is how can you support social democracy and an aristocrat at the same time? whether that aristocrat be donald trump, whom they dispise but are all too eager to defend on any issue, or a alex jones type, like lyndon larouche, who, dispite facts, still thought the british were coming until 1989 (citation needed )when the british told mueller to lock him in jail. and we all know what happens to your life philosophy when the prison mentality sets in... (cough cough) if you havent been to prison, well, you aren't missing out, considering america cultivates prison mentality. theHating: also, the british didnt lock up larouche because of his britain meddling conspiracy, mueller got him for some kind of mail-fraud... smh. all of a sudden he dies and his philosophy is brought back to life and no one is questioning his bizarre conspiracy, instead the schiller institute wants to pour money into expanding this bizarre disinformation campaign, my guess is more talking points to distract people from reality. i really wish i was better prepared for this british crap before ehart blocked me, it would have been fun to see the reaction to someone's critical analysis of a toddler (britain) telling the rockefellers how to run an empire.. (Edited by theHating) theHating: anyway, im done writing books for the socially impoverished, they should go buy facts with their money and leave the ignorant and disillusioned chatters alone, beating unprepared minds at debate is not a good way to deduce humanist goals, and when you confront the compartmentalized mind of these guys, expect many logical fallacies, expect boring phrases, but look at how their platforms on social justice differ and contradict the ideas given to them by these wealthy super pac groups like schiller and pragerU. it is the hardest thing for them to confront. | Politics Chat Room 34 People Chatting Similar Conversations |