Space Force 1

theHating
theHating: so when donald trump says space force, how hard do you laugh?

when rumsfield chaired a board to produce the commission on space, what has now become the spacex and nasa science divisions funded firstly by the gov, and almost exclusively by DOD, which is implied, (they all talk about it and then drop the almighty indicator for analysis of their terminologies is to preclude climate change solutions to be unsurmountable, taxing instead of beneficial, and that it is more feasible and cost effective to move our empire into orbit), did you laugh?
(Edited by theHating)
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: so now, we have more corporate welfare... i mean incentives, to enter into scientific research, specifically the fields of geology, mathematics, and many others, all the way to astrophysics. in fact the all-to-beloved neil degrasse tyson is 100% on board with the "new vision".

what will you guys do with all your science grants? i think im gunna forego my own space research being that im just a high school grad and a janitor doesnt belong in space. i think im gunna use my incentives to burrow underground..

5 years ago Report
1
theHating
theHating: look, both parties agree that humans can cause the globe to turn literally into a barren wasteland in a short amount of time.. just look at senat debates, the fake votes from both parties to introduce some measure to combat climate change..


well, climate change isnt a national interest or a global interest, its definitely a threat, any senator will attest to this fact following his or her justification that america is the force of good, the force of the people, and in fact we are leading the world in emissions reduction and whatnot..
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: climate change scares everyone but only the working class are willing to perform any of the recommendations of climate scientists, which doesnt make a lot of sense why the senator would nationalize a success that his values and sentiments are intrinsically against based on the inconvenience of making less money on petrol and cotton
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: being taxed and penalized is not something that those who are wealthy multi-million a year salaried individuals do not want to waste money on cleaning up what every institution has dirtied in the name of profits, arguably criminal actors, which is what no businessman or senator would allow us to believe they are.
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: the space race has always been a supplementary in military defense, every ten years, as one speaker puts it, the state becomes weary of reduced welfare for its corporate obligations to stock holders and has sought for the last 20 years especially to posit its clandestine solution for the climate change disaster.
(Edited by theHating)
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: in short, climate change is solved by going into space, because it is too much money to clean up, and not profitable to maintain, that was the ultimate conclusion of the IPCC, and why both sides of the american empire can play the science narrative. they gain exposure only on the climate subject, never on the subject of space colonization, which has been stymied solely by an unfunded technological igorance to the reality that the moon is a really long ways away, and beyond that are incredible vast distances of nothingness that would send any encapsulated occupant into an antisocial fit of deranged lunacy, not to mention the dangers of gamma radiation and life support systems, etc etc.
(Edited by theHating)
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: in a meeting in DC, i think back in 2014, spacex, and some other companies were there as well, but my point is, and you can look it up for yourself, not hard to find, my point is in 2014, this meeting between the state and private corporate members was about the subject of state giving the go ahead to revamp nasa and their goal was the new vision which in their words was a national priotrity in the context of climate change.

i had to look it up myself, i encourage any skeptic to consider DARPA as a main source for my conclusion on the subject. and of course their are many resources in DARPA space programs to help investigate exactly what the goal of space force is, and to gain a better idea of why its framed in public debates as "space exploration" that takes national priority in the context of climate change.

then, i believe i have found out so to speak why our global powers are so hesitant to take any major policy on climate change, space is the only one, and the reporters are there, cnn, and the post, and other local outfits are there in the room asking questions and testing them on their rhetoric.

5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: space force 1: the exodus of zion
(Edited by theHating)
5 years ago Report
1
Angry Beaver
Angry Beaver: Australia contributes around 1.3% to human produced carbon dioxide emissions, yet here we are having an election fighting about climate change in a country that has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Makes sense if you're trying to appease the latte swilling greenie brigade I suppose?
(Edited by Angry Beaver)
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: well, from what i gathered from the latest debate in the senate, america is actively reducing emmissions (CITATION DESPARATELY NEEDED) and we should no longer have these debates on the floor because democrats are wildabeasts and just like to complain to waste our time allotments.

no one was against anthropogenic climate change, no one was in favor of enacting the policy at the time, and instead, the precedent was neither party wants to debate whether or not climate change was real, and under that guise, our wise and powerful humanitarians voted to end the climate debate and sleep peacefully knowing that america is reducing emissions (AGAIN, CITATION), and for the house to stop bringing it up as if republicans believe its a hoax.

they know it isnt a hoax, they will admit it now in the year of 2018, what they wont do is debate the science, but somehow achieving this while passing measures to reduce emissions (CAN I PLEASE HAVE A WITNESS?)
5 years ago Report
0
Angry Beaver
Angry Beaver: Well our both mobs here want to reduce emissions by moving to "totally sustainable green methods" [Insert sarcasm here] such as wind and solar power and removing all the coal power stations..... Can't wait to be sitting in my cold home in winter, shivering when they all fail the test and sweltering in summer during peak demand during our 40+ degree days... Oh I know...I'll burn coal in my fireplace in winter! win/win Dunno about summer tho, naked is the best I can do then lol
(Edited by Angry Beaver)
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: lol, well, right

out in montana, there are some co-op style agreements between green energy producers and the natural gas driven turbine company, where if you have panels on your house, and an apparatus to capture and store power, any excess power is sent back up the line and stored in the utility's battery banks. and when this prospect began costing them money, the dominant ted turner montana political action committes began complaining about windmills and got most of them removed. there was and still is no push to get more windmills, unless im mistaken. but there are a lot of mom and pop solar shops in the progressive towns like bozeman and missoula, and maybe kalispell, basically the metropolitan montana, which to say represents maybe a few hundred thousand people, who then all turned around and voted for trump and kept tester. if that isnt a symptom of institutional kingship, im not sure what is.
5 years ago Report
0
The flying Squirrel
The flying Squirrel: Space force is Just the Milatry hidden behind NASA or some Public company as Usual so Every one has to pay for it , And you hear the Claims from the Oh NASA is such good value to the Taxpayer , Really , What have they done , Explored ways to Put Lazers or Missiles into Space ,So they can Shoot down ICBM , But there going to Clonize the Moon and mars by 2020 they say so don"t worry about the earth, there onto it, yeah Shore ,
lol
5 years ago Report
0
The flying Squirrel
The flying Squirrel: If these world Leaders could get In a Rocket and Escape and Nuclear Disaster there going to Create , and Leave the rest of Us behind , Im Shore they would do it , Just like there Nuclear Bunkers
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: aye this shit is stoopud
5 years ago Report
0
theHating
theHating: when did the state start publicly subsidizing clandestine research?
5 years ago Report
0