Anti Fascist Political Economic Commentary 11-6-20 junyabee: Anti Fascist Political Economic Commentary 11-6-20 Observations with an attitude from the Left https://www.academia.edu/44449840/Anti_Fascist_Political_Economic_Commentary_11_6_2020  DIAMONDfire: i wonder that if socialism is a descent are we not all headed there? if that is right fascism would be the logical defence. another thing and this is a bit controversial but its my estimate the left nations of the world don't really want to impose their way on others. junyabee: Fascism, control by the few, is antithetical to pure socialism, decentralized control. Fascism, being self-serving would be inclined to be assertive/aggressive compared to socialism that would rely on the incrementalism of consensus DIAMONDfire: i think fascism is more of a hatred of the ambiguous, control by the few but totally mental and without reserve on that. i don't think they like being hotheads. socialism sounds great, but one's got to question can man restrain himself when confronted with power? in other words if there's a fire then its going to be stoked. these are fallen political ideas i don't think its antithetical, its a variation of the state of depravity we're in. we think we're wise to have these political innovations and overlook the fact that in the hierarchy of knowledge they are very well meted. and further overlook the fact that benevolence is the way out. junyabee: As long as change's derivative can fluctuate in ways that defy past expectations, ambiguity will be the allure of fascism. The carnal drives for comfort security renders the ideals of socialism to demands of physical control and possession DIAMONDfire: the reality is humans are entering a phase in which altruism a disinterested concern for others will be the only liferaft. which means benevolence must be the power source otherwise all these intricate faults we've been talking about will prevail. bearing in mind all this is is ideology not to discount its merit. but until we can recognise the beast 666 for what it is we will surcomb. because it is a power source. and those who claim the evolutionary perspective really only practice beastial ways. the problem is its a device. junyabee: It came to me that when the botany morphed into a mobile form from a rooted spot, the whole paradigm of and for existence changed. Or should I say expanded so to have consumers/cannibals to defecate the fertilizing elements for a regeneration DIAMONDfire: the origin of the 1st commandment, the kingdom of God and hell. the spiritual awakening was a global movement about 3000? years ago. maybe they realised it? the thing is humans are not animals, and there's got be a premium on life as we experience it. a lot of people would disagree with this thinking and claim survival based philosophies. the bible says the tabernacles of bribery are of the wicked and puts it into a box. the wicked are thoroughly known that is. my take is its the strongest literature we have, and is the backbone of all else. people know themselves through it. junyabee: There is a reaffirmed logic that's maintained an enduring legacy for itself. HETERODOX AND IMPROVISATIONS are the expected outcroppings of an organic dynamic DIAMONDfire: speaking of the meaning of existence. meaning is not absolute but more like a shooting star life being the shooting star. perhaps you strike upon it once. but Animism is the attribution of a living soul to all things. is there a contradiction in this? meaning seems more like a precious metal. is meaning and soul not equally transferrable? DIAMONDfire: thats what i mean i thought soul would contain inherent meaning? as an absolute. but that does not seem the case. DIAMONDfire: according to the vedas vishnu brought the world into being and then brahma fused it with meaning. but brahma is the substratum of existence. so if that is correct soul and meaning at least according to the vedas are separate. but it does position the argument for evil. it is evil that meaning the souls fulfilment is cut off. DIAMONDfire: Kant said there is nothing good but good will. which could point to faith. that is my view of faith anyway. its pretty clear to me though that souls live on and it seems this might be the limit of our knowledge? junyabee: Souls' expression are the carrier of interlocuted, temporal energy.? Energy assumes the limited form. Form has its shelf life. so we as THIS material form are vain to give ourselves more importance than its animating essence | Politics Chat Room 56 People Chatting Similar Conversations |