A Memo To Trump and Trump Supporters (Page 89) Wordy and Fun: ""What information was released by the Russians that Trump used? Wikileaks released the emails so what information exactly did the Russians give Trump that he used?" You went from Trump and Russia to Trump and WIkileaks - What happened? (Edited by Wordy and Fun) WHlSKY: Nothing happened. If you didn’t know WikiLeaks is part of the Russian influence. In addition it was not WikiLeaks alone that engaged in the hacking at the time for Russia. One example: “While the GRU and WikiLeaks were releasing hacked documents, the Trump Campaign sought to maximize the impact of those leaks to aid Trump's electoral prospects. Staff on the Trump Campaign sought advance notice about WikiLeaks releases, created messaging strategies to promote and share the materials in anticipation of and following thdr release, and encouraged further leaks. The Trump Campaign publicly undermined the attribution of the hack-and-leak campaign to Russia and was indifferent to whether it and WikiLeaks were furthering a Russian election interference effort. The Committee found no evidence that Campaign officials received an authoritative government notification that the hack was perpetrated by the Russian government before October 7, 2016, when the ODNI and DHS issued a joint statement to that effect. However, the Campaign was aware of the extensive media reporting and other private sector attribution of the hack to Russian actors prior to that point.” [1] ————— Was the above action right or wrong? You are still struggling I guess. [1] https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf Wordy and Fun: " The Committee found no evidence that Campaign officials received an authoritative government notification that the hack was perpetrated by the Russian government before October 7, 2016, when the ODNI and DHS issued a joint statement to that effec" Your post says it clearly does it not ? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The report does not resolve the question of coordination between the campaign and WikiLeaks’ timed release of hacked emails from Podesta. The report does note, however, that the hacked emails were released on Oct. 7, the same day as the release of the “Access Hollywood” tape in which Trump was heard making vulgar boasts about women. The committee says it also developed evidence that Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort may have been connected to the Russian operation to steal and leak Democratic emails. If that had been proven in court, it would have constituted “collusion,” by any definition, but no such charge ever was brought. Manafort was convicted of fraud and tax charges unrelated to Russia. Keep struggling Malvado WHlSKY: “ Your post says it clearly does it not ? ” It does not what? If you don’t understand, it is only stating that the committee did not find evidence that the Campaign officials received an authoritative government notification that the hack was perpetrated by the Russian government, however, it confirms that they did liaise with WikiLeaks and used the leaks to further the Trump campaign. Which was my main point. And as the report stated, there were enough media reporting and other private sector attribution of Russia being behind it prior to Oct 7th 2016. —————— The report clearly stated that this was done through Roger Stone. —————— No struggle here. I enjoyed watching you dish dash around over a simple question. Wordy and Fun: Mueller reasoned that Stone and Assange could have been liable for the hacking conspiracy because they had helped to disseminate and maximize the impact of the stolen documents. But ultimately, Mueller wrote, the Justice Department "did not have admissible evidence," such as proof of an agreement and knowledge that the hack was ongoing, to secure conspiracy convictions. In his discussion of a potential case against Stone, Mueller acknowledged "the existence of some evidence that Stone played a role in coordinating the October 7 release" of hacked emails of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. Mueller's team couldn't find evidence beyond a reasonable doubt "at the present time" that Stone or other campaign advisers coordinated with WikiLeaks, the report said. WHlSKY: I am surprised he was able to find anything to this day given that his investigation was faced with lying and efforts to impede an investigation. Including witnesses who lied, withheld info, deleted communications, used encrypted apps. Witnesses who refused to answer questions. And more. The information from the Senate Intelligence Committee report shows a lot more that was missing and in line. The only thing that can let anyone still hold on to a belief that what was done by the Trump campaign was the right thing, is blinded loyalty. Wordy and Fun: "I am surprised he was able to find anything to this day given that his investigation was faced with lying and efforts to impede an investigation. Including witnesses who lied, withheld info, deleted communications, used encrypted apps. Witnesses who refused to answer questions. And more ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sounds an awful lot like the Clinton campaign and their dealings with Russia / GPS Igor Danchenko, the analyst, was charged in a grand jury indictment with five counts of making false statements to FBI agents during several interviews with agents in 2017 about his work providing information to former British spy Christopher Steele for the dossier. Steele’s inquiry was funded by the firm Fusion GPS, which itself had been hired by the Democratic National Committee to conduct opposition research on the then-Republican candidate Trump. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ But anyways thanks for the laughs Malvado - When you get those convictions for Russian collusion or Wikileaks please let us all know Thanks in advance ! WHlSKY: After all that Roger Stone did, he was given a full pardon by Trump. And people still supported that. Played like a fiddle. Wordy and Fun: But anyways thanks for the laughs Malvado - When you get those convictions for Russian collusion or Wikileaks please let us all know Thanks in advance ! WHlSKY: You said that already. Doesn’t seem that you’re laughing tbh if you have to tell me twice that you are laughing. Haaha Wordy and Fun: But anyways thanks for the laughs Malvado - When you get those convictions for Russian collusion or Wikileaks please let us all know Thanks in advance ! Third time a charm ? LOL WHlSKY: Roger Stone. Full pardon. Tampering with an investigation. Lies. Deletion of information. Manafort. 😏 I gotta hand it to the Trump campaign, it was well played. 🇷🇺 Wordy and Fun: Adam Schiff - Complete and utter liar who read the now discredited Dossier on the House floor Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, dramatically read some of the most explosive claims from the dossier into the Congressional Record during the March 2017 House Intelligence Committee hearing, including the now-debunked claim that the Trump 2016 presidential campaign colluded with Russia. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bloomberg columnist blasts 'showman' Adam Schiff's 'fibs' in new book about alleged Trump-Russia collusion 'Schiff is a resistance leader, not a truth-teller' “Here are some of the matters, drawn from public sources alone, since that is all we can discuss in this setting, that concern us and should concern all Americans,” is how Schiff qualified his remarks at the time. In this way, Schiff gave the impression that he knew more than he could say in public because the evidence in question was classified. He continued to play this game for the next two years, claiming in media interviews that he had “more than circumstantial evidence” of collusion. But in fact, Schiff didn’t know anything more. In 2020, the Trump administration declassified the transcripts of depositions given to the House Intelligence Committee. Every witness had been asked whether or not he or she had seen evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. None of them—not James Clapper, not Sally Yates, not Susan Rice—said they did. Schiff never accounts for the gulf between what witnesses told his committee behind closed doors and what he claimed to know before the cameras. I know he is one of those right wing Bloomberg types - L WHlSKY: Based on what was said of him, Kitty, it appears he knew a lot. Many of them were found to have lied also. Shame though. Mueller was pissed by it haa  Fractured fairy tale: Yeah Right ' ey But peacefull protests , The Whole Country was Whipped Into a Frenzy Of Race bating From Media and politicans , Ripping down Statues Burning buildings down Its a Discrace , And it wasn't Trump Doing it Fractured fairy tale: Only have too listen too That Brainwashed Robot on here  With Race baiting But thats what they want These people have been given full permission from the Establishment Too Spew that stuff 24/7 Fractured fairy tale: what happened Too The HERO of the Wokanarti , The bloke who Won the Tony Award for His Handing of Caronia Virises , oh yeah he got the Sack didn't he Fractured fairy tale: Wasn"t he The one One Who put the Covid positive Patients In Nursing homes , And Wiped out all the old People  Despite the Fact That Who ever was president at the time , Sent a Hospital Ship too New york , oh Yeah it was too , Talk about living in Fantasy Land Fractured fairy tale: Its ok they never Dropped Atomic bobs on Japan , There not That Barbaric , it was a Clever Ruse by The Alberters or the Cultrue , Hollywood    KeithJ: Fox News was caught red-handed committing one of the gravest of all journalistic sins—deceptively editing a sound bite to make a politician say something they did not say. Fractured fairy tale: Obama had 8years Hilary Clinton lost Biden is there ,If He isn't as popular as they want him too be . Who's fault is that Grasping at straws aren't they Fractured fairy tale: Oh I see It's deep seated rage and anger If you didn't vote for those people Not it's your choice too do that It's Fox News and all them places fostering deep seated rage and anger Shore they weren't talking about themselves  kittybobo34: Fox has already lost what little respect I had.. I wouldn't believe them if they told me it was light during the day and dark at night.. They have admitted they are an entertainment business not a news source. | Politics Chat Room 59 People Chatting Similar Conversations |