Why Trump won, a message! (Page 12)

Nicotina
Nicotina: There is no grand jury in the impeachment process.
1 year ago Report
0
davidk1
davidk1: .

Nicotina, and I just called you by your first name. Is that ok with you?

Interesting though, I do call women by their first name because by calling them by their last name, it may be sexist because a married woman uses her husband's last name and the woman might not like her husband all that much....right?

So out of complete respect for the woman, I call her by her first name.

If she asks that I use politically correctness with Miss, Mrs, Ms. or another label, I would be happy to since it is her choice I use her husbands name or other identifying label that is if she is married which I would never assume that she is or that she is not.

Whew.

And time to move on from the grand jury issue. Nancy (or Mrs. or Ms. Pelosi) is holding up the articles because those articles will not hold up in a court of law.

.

1 year ago Report
0
Nicotina
Nicotina: Calling me Nic, Nico, Nicotina works fine. The grand jury reference was for the other person posting here who will now be ignored.

I hope the articles move to the Senate.
1 year ago Report
0
davidk1
davidk1: .

I give it a 50/50 chance.

.
1 year ago Report
0
Fractured fairy tale
(Post deleted by Cenababy 1 year ago)
davidk1
davidk1: .

Ok children, it's time for a bedtime story...

Once upon a time, there was this thing called the Arms Race. The Ruskies and the US for decades made dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens of nukes. At one point there were enough nukes that if they all went off at the same time, the explosion would take out the entire solar system. Then, these two countries decided that they only needed to have enough to destroy the earth. So they decided to dismantle the vast amount of nukes. Over many years, that is what these two countries have done. However, there are a few countries that also have nukes and a few are not so friendly. The US and the Ruskies have enough to make sure that the bozo's that do have them know, for a fact, that if they use just one of these bad boys, their countries will be reduced to.... ....I guess...really big parking lots.

It's call mutual deferred destruction.

Mutual(ly) assured destruction (MAD) is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two or more opposing sides would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender (see pre-emptive nuclear strike and second strike). It is based on the theory of deterrence, which holds that the threat of using strong weapons against the enemy prevents the enemy's use of those same weapons. A strategy is a form of Nash equilibrium in which, once armed, neither side has any incentive to initiate a conflict or to disarm.

The term "mutual assured destruction" was coined by Donald Brennan, a strategist working in Herman Kahn's Hudson Institute in 1962.

It was unfortunate that the Nazi's started the trend. If we had not stopped them, they would have used them. We, the US and Russia, 'hired' their scientists and off we go...

We will never get rid of nukes.

What's really worse, chemical and biological genocide are definitely easier to create and deploy and it is easier for no-name countries and terror organizations to use them as Iraq and Syria have already used on their own people.

Remember what I said about peace through strength and the war between Rome and her neighbors.


If you want others to leave you alone, you have to...

"Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.:

President Theodore Roosevelt

1 year ago Report
0
Fractured fairy tale
(Post deleted by Cenababy 1 year ago)
davidk1
davidk1: .

Why don't you and your Aussie beer drinking alcoholic women come on over and try to make us you punk? After all your women are soberer than the men who constantly piss on themselves. That's where your saying came from but it was....stop pissing on me wanker.




.
1 year ago Report
0
davidk1
davidk1: .

Another great video....I really wish ECHO would watch it and comment. It is from the House impeachment hearing...

NEW!! Brave Jim Jordan SILENCE Lying Jerry Nadler With Just One Question

1 year ago Report
0
Nicotina
Nicotina: It was called Mutually Assured Destruction. aka MAD
1 year ago Report
0
Nicotina
Nicotina: Jim Jordan needs to STFU!

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/referee-says-he-told-rep-jim-jordan-ohio-state-doctor-n1078476

https://www.wkyc.com/article/sports/college/osu/new-lawsuit-further-alleges-ohio-us-rep-jim-jordan-knew-of-former-ohio-state-doctors-abuse/95-0e70134f-5fc9-492f-9a03-cfd3d934a4ab

https://www.thedailybeast.com/7th-former-wrestler-rep-jim-jordan-definitely-knew-about-abuse
1 year ago Report
0
davidk1
davidk1: .

The Daily Beast - https://www.thedailybeast.com/7th-former-wrestler-rep-jim-jordan-definitely-knew-about-abuse

This article was posted July 8, 2018 or 18 months ago. If it had been true, he would have been charged with a crime. FAKE NEWS by an outlet that HATES Trump and has posted fake news in the past.

Based on the same lie as the Daily Beast. This was another FAKE news release.
https://www.wkyc.com/article/sports/college/osu/new-lawsuit-further-alleges-ohio-us-rep-jim-jordan-knew-of-former-ohio-state-doctors-abuse/95-0e70134f-5fc9-492f-9a03-cfd3d934a4ab

And finally...Just another repost of the FAKE allegations from 18 months ago about an issue decades ago that went nowhere.https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/referee-says-he-told-rep-jim-jordan-ohio-state-doctor-n1078476

This is just another Supreme Court Judge Cavanaugh style smear campaign because the honorable Congressman is uncovering the truth and folks like you can not accept that the Democrats are grasping for their last breaths of air. If this were anywhere close to even being close to true, CNN and MSNBC would have this on front page and on every newscast.

By you regurgitation this terrible smear, you are as bad as Schiff, Nadler and Pelosi.

--------------------------

You want something that the media covered up where charges actually took place? Go to this site and read about this Congressman who physically attacked his gay lover. From the leftist News outlest LA Times.

http://www.thenetspies.com/usnews/l-a-times-adam-schiffs-gay-lover-makes-claims-of-abuse/

L.A. Times: Adam Schiff’s Gay Lover Makes Claims Of Abuse
February 11, 2018 by Lakim Nesnah

Los Angeles, CA- Los Angeles Times reporter and assistant managing editor, Kristina Bellatori dropped another bombshell in what can only be described as the ongoing US Congressional and political sex and domestic violence scandal this afternoon.

________________________________


How about this about Adam Schiff...

Adam Schiff’s multiple visits to Ed Buck’s sex, meth den
https://seeingredaz.wordpress.com/2019/11/03/adam-schiffs-multiple-visits-to-ed-bucks-sex-meth-den/


Schiff becomes even more notable as it’s been revealed that he visited Ed Buck’s den of horrors — otherwise known as his Hollywood home — at least a dozen times. This is the same place where Buck would bring homeless, usually black men, back for a evening of less than wholesome antics, fueled by methamphetamines and carried out on floor mattresses. At least a couple lost their lives, before Buck was finally arrested after another man escaped.

Buck’s federal criminal trial has been rescheduled from Nov. 26 of this year to Aug. 4, 2020. He is currently being held in the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles.

Damn, the internet is packed with Schiff failings....

Here's another one....

Nagging Ethics Questions Regarding Democrat House Intel Chair Adam Schiff 03/04/2019 The Daily Wire
https://lists.grabien.com/list-rep-adam-schiff-scandals-controversies-embarrassments


House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) apparently coached former Donald Trump attorney Michael Cohen on what would be discussed at last week’s congressional hearing.

This, along with a meeting between Schiff and Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson prior to Simpson’s testimony and a long list of examples of the congressman claiming to have evidence against President Donald Trump that never materializes, lead one to wonder why Schiff hasn’t been the subject of an ethics investigation. Why? Because the House is controlled by the Dem's.


You do not want me to start posting dozens of articles about Schiff.

He's in so much trouble with Nancy, I would be surprised if he lasts until Nov2020. Dead or alive. Remember what happened to Epstein? He was the golden boy until he started to turn states evidence. And you do not think Schiff would roll? He's a coward and pervert and would in a heartbeat.

Jordan is an honorable man not like Schiff.

.




1 year ago Report
0
Nicotina
Nicotina: Jordan has NO HONOUR!
1 year ago Report
0
davidk1
davidk1: .

What about Schiff? After what I posted?

.
1 year ago Report
0
Nicotina
Nicotina: "you are as bad as Schiff, Nadler and Pelosi." - davidk1
I refuse to engage people who have no honour.
1 year ago Report
0
davidk1
davidk1: .

Still leaves the question. You afraid to answer the question? And if you support those three, you are as bad as them....people with no honor. So you approve of those three or not? Make your case.

.
1 year ago Report
0
The giant midget
The giant midget: Political arenas everywhere need more people like Jim Jordan , to bring back integrity and honesty ( if there was ever any ) ""cough"". It the line of questioning and responding
Keep,career bureaucrats and politicians on their feet
More Jordan's types on both sides of the political parties
Just saying eh
1 year ago Report
0
davidk1
davidk1: Read this article of a number of reasons why Nancy Pelosi is holding back the articles:

1. Pelosi truly doesn’t think the Senate will conduct a fair trial.

2. Pelosi has been holding the articles to secure Senate consideration of some of those House-passed bills

3. Impeachment has gone badly for the Democrats. Pelosi was forced into impeaching the president by liberals in her caucus.

4. Pelosi feared a Senate trial. The president and many Republicans have said they wanted to summon her, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the Bidens and the whistleblower as witnesses in a Senate trial. Nothing good would come from a wide-open Senate trial for Democrats.

5. Pelosi wanted to hold the articles of impeachment through the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary.

6. Pelosi was waiting for the House to adopt additional articles of impeachment in the coming months.

7. By holding the articles, Pelosi was daring McConnell to advance some sort of resolution (which wouldn’t have direct parliamentary bearing on the articles of impeachment approved by the House) to condemn the House’s action.

8. By holding the articles, Pelosi could dictate when a Senate trial could begin.

9. Pelosi has known how to get under Trump’s skin.

10. By stalling the articles in perpetuity, Pelosi could block the president from his chief wish: exoneration by the Senate

11. By keeping the articles in the House, Pelosi would maintain control, instead of Trump.

12. Pelosi held real concerns about a Senate trial and what such a spectacle could mean for the country. A wide-ranging, hyperbolic trial in a toxified climate truly could test the political guardrails for both sides.

13. Pelosi has no idea what she is doing.

Author. Chad Pergram
1 year ago Report
0
SandyGotTheSHITS
SandyGotTheSHITS: Good Grief, so this is how he spends Christmas Day
(Edited by SandyGotTheSHITS)
1 year ago Report
1
mrbult
mrbult: the dumbest president ever !!!!
1 year ago Report
0
Cenababy
Cenababy: Really? Look what he has done, moron
1 year ago Report
0
RoseLil
RoseLil: https://nypost.com/2020/09/23/gop-senators-release-explosive-report-on-hunter-biden-burisma/ Criminal Dems. Biden's son.
1 year ago Report
0
Cenababy
Cenababy: and lok at all he documents being released now? but this administration was wrong? wow

and now docs reporting hillary approved making up garbage about Trump and Obama knowing it! uh huh
1 year ago Report
0
Nicotina
Nicotina: His taxes!
1 year ago Report
0
RoseLil
RoseLil: He is audited every yr... it's another dem lie. check the taxes of those who were poor and now are millionaires in gov.
1 year ago Report
0