U.S. Presidential Race--Who should win? (Page 29)

lori100
lori100: I've heard experts on shows saying the party still has the option to change the rules at the convention and can still decide who the nominee will be..
7 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: Republican leaders consider rewriting convention rules - POLITICO

www.politico.com/.../republican-leaders-consider-rewriting-conv...


Politico


Apr 15, 2016 - If that rule were changed, it could open the door for a candidate not ... or any drastic sudden change to the party's rules for that matter – out of ...
7 years ago Report
0
davidk14
davidk14: .

Lori...I can almost guarantee....that will not happen.

It is a possibility, however, if by some astronomical flyby occurs and Jesus comes down to earth on a white horse....if the Republicans try to change the rules.....

Revolution.

It may not be soon....but there will be some really pissed off American Patriots. The Republican establishment will not let that happen.

They will nominate Trump and they will get the VP candidate to run with Trump.

Compromise.



.
7 years ago Report
0
davidk14
davidk14: .

Take a screen shot of this page and lets see what happens in November.

.
7 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: will see...
7 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: White House Watch: Trump 42%, Clinton 37%
Rasmussen Reports‎
7 years ago Report
0
sheperd1_1
sheperd1_1: go trump!prove all the so-called "intellectuals false
7 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: Report: Clinton For-Profit Education Scandal Dwarfs Trump University
Fox Nation - Fox News‎-------------NEW YORK – Bill and Hillary Clinton’s attack on Donald Trump over Trump University could invite increased scrutiny of the Clintons’ involvement in a for-profit education scandal in which a company that runs shell colleges paid Bill Clinton $16.5 million to be its pitchman.
7 years ago Report
1
lori100
lori100: the hill-----“What I saw in the 1990s sickened me,” Byrne writes in the introduction of “Crisis of Character: A White House Secret Service Officer Discloses His Firsthand Experience with Hillary, Bill and How They Operate.” The book, due out June 28, already holds the top spot on Amazon's best-seller list.
“Hillary Clinton is now poised to become the Democratic nominee for president of the United States, but she simply lacks the integrity and temperament to serve in the office,” he said.

“From the bottom of my soul I know this to be true. And with Hillary’s latest rise, I realize that her own leadership style — volcanic, impulsive, enabled by sycophants and disdainful of the rule set for everyone else — hasn’t changed a bit.”

Byrne recounted seeing a vase "smashed to bits" and Bill Clinton sporting a "real, live, put-a-steak-on-it black eye" one morning in 1995 after a loud fight between the Clintons the night before.
7 years ago Report
2
I K R
I K R: Global Research Editor’s Note

This article was first published by The Huffington Post. The author of the article is distinguished film producer Frank Huguenard

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-to-be-indicted-on-federal-racketeering_us_574af94be4b0009f3d848d20

Since its posting on the Huffington Post, the article has been removed.
The above link leads to an error message.The text below is the original post, which appears on Frank Huguenard’s Facebook page.
www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=frank huguenard
.
This is an important article, please forward.
(M. Ch. GR Ed.)
.
* * *

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime. RICO allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.

Activity considered to be racketeering may include bribery, counterfeiting, money laundering, embezzlement, illegal gambling, kidnapping, murder, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other nefarious business practices.

James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.

“The New York Times examined Bill Clinton’s relationship with a Canadian mining financier, Frank Giustra, who has donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation and sits on its board. Clinton, the story suggests, helped Giustra’s company secure a lucrative uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan and in return received “a flow of cash” to the Clinton Foundation, including previously undisclosed donations from the company’s chairman totaling $2.35 million.” ( Bloomberg)

Initially, Comey had indicated that the investigation into Hillary’s home brewed email server was to be concluded by October of 2015. However, as more and more evidence in the case has come to light, this initial date kept being pushed back as the criminal investigation has expanded well beyond violating State Department regulations to include questions about espionage, perjury and influence peddling.

Here’s what we do know. Tens of millions of dollars donated to the Clinton Foundation was funneled to the organization through a Canadian shell company which has made tracing the donors nearly impossible. Less than 10% of donations to the Foundation has actually been released to charitable organizations and $2M that has been traced back to long time Bill Clinton friend Julie McMahon (aka The Energizer). When the official investigation into Hillary’s email server began, she instructed her IT professional to delete over 30,000 emails and cloud backups of her emails older than 30 days at both Platte River Networks and Datto, Inc. The FBI has subsequently recovered the majority, if not all, of Hillary’s deleted emails and are putting together a strong case against her for attempting to cover up her illegal and illicit activities.

A conviction under RICO comes when the Department of Justice proves that the defendant has engaged in two or more examples of racketeering and that the defendant maintained an interest in, participated in or invested in a criminal enterprise affecting interstate or foreign commerce. There is ample evidence already in the public record that the Clinton Foundation qualifies as a criminal enterprise and there’s no doubt that the FBI is privy to significantly more evidence than has already been made public.

Under RICO, the sections most relevant in this case will be section 1503 (obstruction of justice), section 1510 (obstruction of criminal investigations) and section 1511 (obstruction of State or local law enforcement). As in the case with Richard Nixon after the Watergate Break-in, it’s the cover-up of a crime that will be the Clintons’ downfall. Furthermore, under provisions of title 18, United States Code: Section 201, the Clinton Foundation can be held accountable for improprieties relating to bribery. The FBI will be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that through the Clinton Foundation, international entities were able to commit bribery in exchange for help in securing business deals, such as the uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan.

It is a Federal Crime to negligently handle classified information under United States Code (USC) 18 section 1924. It is a Federal Class A Felony under USC 18 section 798. Hillary certified under oath to a federal judge that she had handed over to the state department all of her emails, which she clearly did not. In spite of her repeated statements to the effect that everything that she did with her home brewed email server as Secretary of State was above-board and approved by the State Department, the Inspector General Report vehemently refutes this claim. Hillary refused to be interview by the Inspector General’s office in their investigation, claiming that her upcoming FBI interview took precedent but it seems more likely that Hillary is more concerned about committing perjury or admitting to anything that can be used against her in a court of law.

“Secretary Clinton should have preserved any Federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records with the related files in the Office of the Secretary. At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the Department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act.”

Inspector General Report

Hillary Clinton is guilty of exposing classified documents to foreign governments by placing them illegally on her server, of sending and receiving classified documents and conspiring with her staff to circumvent the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by avoiding the use of the State Department run servers. Some of the documents were so highly classified the the investigators on the case weren’t even able to examine the material themselves until they got their own clearances raised to the highest levels.

While there is an excellent cast to be made the Hillary committed treasonous actions, the strongest case the FBI has is charging both Bill and Hillary Clinton as well as the Clinton Foundation of Racketeering. There’s no wonder why it’s taken this long for the FBI to bring forward a recommendation.

The rabbit hole is so deep on this one that it has taking dozens of investigators to determine the full extent of the crimes that have been committed. Perhaps the most interesting question here is whether or not the FBI’s investigation will be able to directly link The Clinton Foundation with The Hillary Victory Fund. If this happens, the DNC itself may be in jeopardy of accusations of either being an accomplice or of being complicit in racketeering.

The original source of this article is Frank Huguenard Facebook
Copyright © Frank Huguenard, Frank Huguenard Facebook, 2016

YouTube

YouTube

its like a soap opera .....there better not be anti climax at the end


7 years ago Report
2
davidk14
davidk14: .

I'm not surprised.

.
7 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: she will likely get away with her crimes...they usually do....don't be surprised if those to testify commit 'suicide' or have an "accident".....
7 years ago Report
1
I K R
I K R: I wouldn't be surprised if she still walks away from it, ....Will Obama indict her or endorse her? Could end up incriminating himself?.... On the other hand the FBI have threatened to go public with it if he refuses ....So who knows....the plot just keeps getting thicker.
One of Bill Clintons ex mistresses from the 1990's has recently tweeted if you hear ive committed suicide dont believe it!
(Edited by I K R)
7 years ago Report
1
davidk14
davidk14: .

If I were Trump....I'd hire some private security to enhance my protection for myself as well as for my family.

.

7 years ago Report
1
lori100
lori100: they get protection ----------Secret Service protection activated for Trump, Carson | Fox News

www.foxnews.com/.../source-trump-carson-likely-to-...

Fox News Channel


Oct 19, 2015 - "We're getting the biggest crowds," he told Fox News' "On the Record ... that the two GOP candidates were likely to get Secret Service protection amid ... an uptick in threats against the man who would be the first black president
7 years ago Report
0
davidk14
davidk14: .

Lori...The Secret Service IS the US Government. You trust them?

.
7 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: hmm ...idk....some might be decent and trustworthy...
7 years ago Report
0
davidk14
davidk14: .

All it takes...is one.

.
7 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: true
7 years ago Report
0
duncan124
duncan124:

German knives are out for Obama.

The fake news from Norway that it was banning combustion engines from cars repeated by Huffington post recently is a rerun of German activity from the Kennedy era.

Obama was embarrassed about Kennedys nazi buddies attempted involvement in Saab after the rocket crew were shown to have tried to dictate to the small car and aircraft maker.

When the ban was first talked of in the news the source was traced back to Germany.

So is Trump more attractive to Germany then Obama?
7 years ago Report
0
sheperd1_1
sheperd1_1: Obama wasn't too embarrassed--he licked ted kennedys' ass--that's how Obama got elected--Obama tapped merkels' phone and nary a peep out of her mouth---she wants to keep the millions in aid$$$$ our taxes give germany
7 years ago Report
0
aaaaaaa7777777
aaaaaaa7777777: Trump trump trump!!!!
7 years ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: Just hope you don't get what you wish for.
7 years ago Report
0
aaaaaaa7777777
aaaaaaa7777777: If I had a genie in a bottle your right, my first wish would be for trump, my second for the wall Mercia
7 years ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: Why, why, why do you need a president? Having a monkey do the job would be a lot cheaper, and would result in fewer snafus.
7 years ago Report
0