Syrian Conflict (2011-now) (Page 45)

SWlNE:
I'll repeat it again. This isn't a fucking Islamic or anti-Islamic thread.

SWlNE:
Hillary voiced her stance on Syria and it turns out to be a stance that can escalate the situation.
Trump hasn't deeply voiced his, except he seems to not want the US to be heavily involved and to work along with Russia.

Now, that's campaign speech. Hillary and the rest of the gang aren't carrying out their actions for goodwill or for peace, they're doing it because the US has an interest in the situation, an economic one. Trump tends to lean towards economic interests for the US at any cost. I tend not to believe that he will stick to his stance. He's only speaking from the view of someone who doesn't know the US agenda for the ME. Once he knows and once he sees the economic gains for the US what will make him change that view? That's one side that's puzzles me.

I really doubt anyone has the interest of the Syrians.

gronchbove: Saudi Arabia was set up by the British. Watch "Lawrence of Arabia."

AmeriKKKa has no solution. It has become a nation ruled by KKKriminals & KKKlowns.

SWlNE: What specifically about korea, AbCX?

gronchbove: ABC, this is the Syria forum.

SWlNE:
Britain stated that they will continue training the forces who they support in Syria:

"Barack Obama abandoned the $500m cornerstone of US Syria strategy after it emerged the programme to deliver more than 15,000 fighters against Islamic State had produced only a handful. The small number it trained were quickly overrun by extremist forces and gave up their weapons.

US commanders struggled to find rebels who could pass stringent security vetting, spend time training away from the battlefield, or who agreed to only fight Islamic State and not the forces of president Bashar al Assad.

America re-launched the programme earlier this year, saying it would only vet rebel commanders, not all their men."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/24/britain-to-resume-training-syrian-rebels/


Looks like a disaster to me.

SWlNE:
On the other side of the fence, China stated they will be providing aid and military support to Syrian forces.

ISIS is like a brief commercial for the full-length movie.

gronchbove: Let us talk about this seriously. Swine, do you know how old time wars were fought, like in the Ancient days?

The first round "were skirmishers." You might call them "cannon fodder." Right?

Perhaps, the Danglos are using these Syrian rebel groups and so forth as "cannon fodder" to cause chaos.

gronchbove: When Russia returned to their military base in Syria, they forced the second round.

These "skirmishers" do not have many airplanes or anti-aircraft weapons, right? Thus, they were constructed to slaughter civilians only.

gronchbove: With the US building an airforce base in Rmelian, Syria, the third round has been reached.

gronchbove: The fourth round was reached when the US murdered 62 Syrians. The US and Russia had made a truce and alliance. Now, the allies - US were murdering their own allies. That is not only an act of War, and murder but also a violation of all War rules.

The Danglos have violated all of the Universal Laws.

Russia & Syria "were attacked" and have due cause to respond by slaughtering Danglo troops.

gronchbove: No matter how strong your army is "If your war makes NO SENSE, then your victory is no likely."

Can anyone on this planet "explain" the US, European or Danglo war strategy in Syria?

Perhaps, they use "bad guys" as "skirmishers." Have they identified GOOD Syrians? No.

Thus, the Danglo strategy is only to DESTROY! And can that war strategy succeed?

gronchbove: Syria is a quagmire. The nation is already destroyed.

briansmythe: Gronch are u weeping it is a muslim land woops wrong thread lol