New world leaders should be hand selected (Page 2)

Pragmatic Aristocrat: @OutbackJack: I dont think its simply social conditioning. People like dogs are social creatures. Its simply instinct to want to bond and make connections.

Outbackjack: It is definitely social conditioning. If we lived in a real democracy where people participated in at a local level then people would feel more empowered as a whole. You would still get people who wanted to dominate but this would be more tempered by the fact that everyone had more of a say and could participate equally.

Whereas now we have a system that deliberately disempowers the population.We have this illusion that you can somehow participate by nominating one of two people out of a large population and sticking a piece of paper in box every 4 years.The reality is that schools,media and government instill in us from a young age a belief that there is nothing we can do about the world and that we must not rock the boat.This is the type of social conditioning that I speak of in groups when the Psychopaths come to the fore and the rest of the people lay low.

Pragmatic Aristocrat: Unless you are saying cave men all survived on their own like cats vs dogs. So what evidence do you have supporting the claim that ancient man did not live in groups but instead they lived alone by themselves like a wild tiger would do?
http://www.timemaps.com/hunter-gatherer

Outbackjack: I have said none of the above that you stated. I am quite obviously talking about contemporary society.

dennygringo56: It doesn't matter who you vote for, especially in America. They are all hand picked by a super powerful parallel secret upper government called "The Olympians" which are the upper echelon of The Committee of 300, the most wealthy and influential people on the planet. Look into it, please.

Pragmatic Aristocrat: @dennygringo: The system was meant to pick leaders based on how well they lead not how rich their parents are or how good their lobbyist might be.

dennygringo56: In a perfect world we, or better said, every nation would have a wise man as a leader. In the real world, however, a wise man would never occupy the throne. The last one to do so was King Solomon. Bear in mind that the first imperative for wisdom is the relinquishing of the desire for power, therefore a wise man would never be in power. The bottom line is we are a temporal species in the grand scheme of things. The human condition is such that we will not exist forever. We are walking on this earth but for a blink of an eye. Thank you A.P.

Goerree: We need to control the Media first

Pragmatic Aristocrat: @Goerree: Controlling the media to influence who gets to be leader is even more corrupt. I also pretty sure this is how communist states get it done. Not to mention that would create a lot of censorship. That wont fly in places like the US where everyone is so opinionated.

@dennygringo: There is some people who know to lead in power who honestly care. The issue is its so rare we have these people in power. A lot of times people come to power by luck not because they would make good leaders. The point of this system is to identify those traits EARLY in everyone not just people who happen to have a rich daddy or parents in influential positions. A lot of times the people given the best shot for positions already have connections. However simply being connected to power and influence does not make you automatically a good leader/Influence.

Goerree: That isnt what i meant at all for goodness sake

Pragmatic Aristocrat: @Goerree: Okay what did you mean by controlling the media?

dennygringo56: The media is already controlled. Both Ted Turner and Rupert Murdoch are Committee 300 members.