Why can't Muslims Take Criticism? (Page 3)

I K R
I K R: Do you think they would all want Sharia law if it gave all non muslims the preferential treatment.?...Hmm probably not.!.
3 years ago Report
1
briansmythe
3 years ago Report
1
briansmythe
briansmythe: If u feel that way about islam do it in real life , Ive tried for years but no one gets what islam is all about , On wire ive found 5 or 6 people
3 years ago Report
2
calybonos
calybonos: I believe I should have the choice of being governed according to Murphy's Law, which states -

Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong....so don't blame me, I didn't do it.
3 years ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: With an attitude like that, my lad, your date with a bacon slicer is assured.
3 years ago Report
0
Titanser
Titanser: You have to understand people like these are scared to shout their hate in real life
3 years ago Report
0
calybonos
calybonos: Better still...

L.A. law, which states - If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit.

That is, if you're lucky enough to survive the arrest and make it to trial...
3 years ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: I use one size fits all gloves, so I reckon your chances of getting off are pretty close to zero.
3 years ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: And for Titanser, we in Europe don't need lectures on Muslims from the hellhole of Tennessee.

http://www.nashvillescene.com/news/article/13063701/buzzfeed-reports-on-tennessee-as-hellhole-for-muslims
3 years ago Report
0
briansmythe
briansmythe: So let me get this straight some Muslims in Europe can openly shout there hate for the society they live in, demand sharia law burn US flags tell every one there taking over tell the police and every one else to go to hell , But if you say u don't like islam your a hater , because the government says so
3 years ago Report
3
I K R
I K R: If a bit of graffiti makes Tennessee a hell hole for muslims?
3 years ago Report
2
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: We are repeatedly told by Muslims that Islam is a religion of peace. Understandable that they would do this, considering how much violence is being perpetrated, right now, in its name. Being accused of being a follower of the religion of murder must get a little wearisome after a time. So should we believe them? Maybe it's time to take a peek inside the Quran.

Verse 9:29 ( Shakir ): Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

From my reading of that verse, it suggests Muslims have the right to subjugate anyone who doesn't believe in the teachings of Muhammad, by force if necessary. Not exactly a pacifist stance.
3 years ago Report
1
Mr__Turtle
Mr__Turtle: Islam is not a religion its a cult. muhammad read the old and new testaments and the tora, he then took a mish mash of all 3 added a few of his own perversions and hay presto you have islam.
3 years ago Report
4
I K R
I K R: Hmm yeah he'd be done for plagiarism if he'd wrote the Koran today.
3 years ago Report
2
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: Old Muhammad was illiterate, as were most Arabs at that time. He listerned to the Jews and Christians talk, and formed his new religion by combining what he remembered hearing with traditional Arabian beliefs. Then he played his masterstroke. He claimed that it were the older beliefs that were corrupted, not his, and he was preaching the truth. There's lies, damned lies, and religion.
3 years ago Report
2
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: What really got Islam off to a flying start was the promise of plunder. Invading other peoples' lands and taking anything that could be nicked. Stealing was an Arabian sport, so when the Caliphs needed a wheeze to preserve Islamic unity, it didn't take them long to set the camels rolling over the border. That was fourteen hundred years ago, and still they keep coming, intent as always with what they can lay their mitts on.
3 years ago Report
1
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: One needs to be careful what one says:

British police have promised not to tolerate any speech that could cause offense on social media regarding Syrian migrants, after arresting a man for Facebook comments made about recent arrivals on his small Scottish Island.

The tiny Isle of Bute in the Firth of Clyde, which had a total population of just 6,498 in 2011, is expected to take in around 1,000 Syrian migrants, with 12 families already arriving since December last year (picture above).

However, commenting on the comparatively huge and sudden influx of Muslim immigrants online just became a very risky business for local residents.

Police have confirmed they have arrested a 41-year-old local man under the Communications Act, after receiving a report of a supposedly “offensive” comment made on Facebook regarding the migrants.

A police spokesman was unequivocal, that any harsh criticism of the Muslim influx would not be “tolerated”.

[ http://iotwreport.com/an-island-of-6500-to-receive-1000-muslim-immigrants-and-if-you-complain-you-will-be-arrested/ ]
3 years ago Report
0
I K R
I K R: the reason the population is so small is because people have to move away to find work....what is the point of putting all these families there?
3 years ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: I would say the reasoning is similar to that employed in disposing of nuclear waste. Find an out of the way place to bury a toxic substance.
3 years ago Report
0
I K R
I K R: lol
3 years ago Report
0
briansmythe
briansmythe: 1/6 of the population is a high number, Mabye there using them as an experiment see how long it takes the the protected species, to take over, Done blame the poor bloke if I seen a boat load of Burkas heading my way lol
3 years ago Report
0
dave3974
dave3974: rip free speech
3 years ago Report
1
I K R
3 years ago Report
1
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: Even in the Muslim world they've had enough of Muslim fanaticism :

Days after Ukip reignited calls for a ban on the burka in Britain, Egypt has now moved closer to banning the veil.

The full-face veil has long been associated with followers of Islam and typically covers all of the wearer’s face other than their eyes.

Egypt, a predominately Muslim country, has placed several restrictions in recent years on wearing the niqab following a sharp rise in those wearing the full veil in the last decade.

The ban would apply in public places and government buildings.

Leading politicians argued the full-face veil is neither an Islamic tradition, nor required in the Koran.

Member of Parliament Amna Nosseir, also a member of Egypt's Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, revealed the niqab is instead a Jewish tradition.

She insisted "the niqab is not an Islamic duty" and instead was "a part of Judaism".

She has argued that it is a tradition which appeared in the Arabian Peninsula prior to Islam and that a variety of Koran passages contradict its use.

Dr Nosseir added that while the Koran calls for modest clothing and for women to cover their hair, the holy book does not ask for women to cover their faces.

[ http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/651292/Egypt-BURKA-BAN-politicians-NOT-Islamic-Jewish-veil-full-face-extremism ]

3 years ago Report
0
ghostgeek
ghostgeek: Somehow, we in the West seem to be attracting the Muslim crazies. Maybe it's because they see us as a soft touch.
3 years ago Report
1