President Obama's Statement in Response to the Zimmerman Verdict. (Page 4)

davidk14
davidk14: .

Oh and you believe that "everyone" is a racist who points out racism in others especially when it's within the same race. It's obvious to you that a person pointing out black on black killings which dwarf any other race killings in the US must be a racist....obvious to ignorant fools of course. Would you agree or disagree?

.
10 years ago Report
1
chronology
chronology: Ninja. A weapon is something used to injure a person. If someone used a stick to beat another person, that stick is a weapon, if someone uses a rock to strike another person with, that rock is a weapon, and if someone uses a slab of concrete to smash another persons head into that concrete becomes a weapon. Your smear comments about George also do not fit the witness statements of many people who knew George before the savage attack on him by Martin. Witness after witness testified to George being helpful and friendly to people of different races.

I do not engage in smear blogging, but I find it noteworthy you have focused on suggestions about George's character but left out the stack of evidence that did not 'speculate' but irrefutably proved Martin had a history of violence.
10 years ago Report
0
Inspector Ninja
Inspector Ninja: Chronology, I'm suspecting your similarity to david here, you're jumping to the unfounded defense of a killer by vaguely alluding to familial witness statements. Wow, his co-workers aid he was alright. His family defended him tirelessly, as would be expected, that hardly exonerates his character. You're operating as much on a speculative basis as I am, yet you have chosen a side, coming in support of said killer because you believe a couple of scratches on the head is worth killing for. I notice you claimed Trayvon reaching for the gun as fact, again relying on the man who killed him for evidence. That is distressing and again, leads any observer to question your ultimate intentions, which are clearly based solely on the word of the man whom is under scrutiny.
Now, for someone who doesn't engage in smear blogging, then goes on to allude to someones character, I have every reason to think your motivations are not as you would have others believe.

David, I don't believe everyone is a racist, I believe you are. I'm well aware of black on black violence, I'm also aware of societal limitations and ridiculous gun laws. I'm also aware that people rarely point to a specific race unless they have intentions towards said race, one way or another. In your case, you are equating the levels of violence WITH the race, rather than with the situation, the location and the history. That's the issue. No one is denying these things happen, but you are supposing that this is due to their race, not to their circumstance. That is what is racist.
10 years ago Report
0
davidk14
davidk14: .

ninja said:

....you are equating the levels of violence WITH the race

David responds:

Here's your mistake. I am not equating the levels on violence WITH the race, I am equating levels of violence WITHIN the race. You afraid of the facts?

You speak like Al Sharpton or other race baters that refuse to accept the level of violence WITHIN the black community ON the black community as well as on OTHER communities which are not black.

.
10 years ago Report
0
Inspector Ninja
Inspector Ninja: No one is refusing the violence. No one is denying the violence, what we are talking about is your devotion to pointing it out specifically. My equating the violence within the race, you're equating it with the race. What is hard to understand about that?
10 years ago Report
0
davidk14
davidk14: .

You called me a racist for pointing it out.

You would rather the truth be kept in the shadows as if it does not exist? Left wing media is doing a great job of that.

A wise man once said:

A 'No' uttered from the deepest conviction is better than a 'Yes' merely uttered to please, or worse, to avoid trouble.

I'd rather point it out than to keep the truth in the shadows.

.

10 years ago Report
0
Inspector Ninja
Inspector Ninja: Yes david, I called you a racist for pointing it out, seeing as we were talking about a specific case. You decided weirdly, in a case specifically about violence on a young black male, to try and prove that black people are more inclined to crime by stating figures. Again, no one denies this violence happens, but the root cause is the place of disagreement. You brought it up via the colour of skin, not for any other reason. So yeah, I still think you're a racist. I'm also bored of you, this thread, zimmerman and racists. I won't bother to continue responding, you're not equipped properly to communicate.
10 years ago Report
0
davidk14
davidk14: .

You still want to hide your head in the sand and you will continue to do so as per your very last statement.

.
10 years ago Report
1
colemant57
colemant57: Obama is the biggest mistake America has made in last 200 years
10 years ago Report
0
DEEP_acheleg
DEEP_acheleg: the assertion that zimmerman was acting out of racism is m moot, in the light of all the families, including african american families, he obliged himself to defend as the head of neighborhood watch, and as an official lesion for the local police. he took many police reports, as acting police liaison, in a multicultural neighborhood, and the minorities in that neighborhood all appreciated his efforts as neighborhood watch/lesion. he had no history of racist aspirations. additionally, zimmerman had had run-ins befor with trevon- who appeared to be scoping out burglary targets- the exact thing zimmerman supposed he was doing the night zimmerman confronted trevon about what he was doing, peering thru shop windows. trevon and Zimmerman had history, and, on all occasions, trevon was acting suspicious , in a consistent manner with casing a joint for burglary.

how the actual fight ensued is questionable; however,m Zimmerman had a long history with his neighbors of all ethnic groups of showing no signs of racism.
10 years ago Report
0
DEEP_acheleg
DEEP_acheleg: zimmermans actions were consistent with law, so, if you have a problem with the verdict, demand the stand your ground law to be amended, to remove the provision of stand your ground outside of your place of residence- as many other states stand your ground laws limit themselves at
10 years ago Report
0
DEEP_acheleg
DEEP_acheleg: i dont rule out racial motivations; however, the totality of evidence shows no racial intent
10 years ago Report
0
morning_glorie
9 years ago Report
0