How Israel shattered Gaza truce leading to escalating death and tragedy: a timeline (Page 8)

chronology: ? which 'Americans' are angry over Pollards release? Israili activists in the U.S. and Israel have long campained for Pollards freedom calling him a 'Marter' and his sentence 'savage' and unjust. Who knows.

U.S. Federal Agents will remember the case probably for the difficult follow up work they had to do to clean up the mess. In Israil where they went to try and recover their stolen property they were treated with hostility like they were rival football fans or something. In the U.S. they found few people willing to be too harsh in condemning Pollard, who was seen as a romantic for Israil. U.S. Officials saw Pollard as simply an opportunist selling valuable goods.

Anyhow, Pollard will soon be back in Israil and all this forgotten.

SWlNE:
I'm sure that you consider Israeli activists (the same country he spied on the US for and gave sensitive information to), and Israel as representatives of the US population.

Now let's return to reality.

His release is not on merit but similar to a bargaining chip. Example, if a child throws a tantrum in a supermarket a parent might bargain a back of chips for him to behave himself.
Some might remember it was raised before but for the Israel-Palestine dispute. It was placed as a chip then.

I've not read then or now a down playing of his actions as being 'a simple opportunist selling valuable goods". Perhaps that's your personal view on the matter. I've read of calls for him to serve out his time for betraying the US.

Are you in agreement to releasing a guy who's responsible for one of the biggest U.S. national security breaches? Information that was released not to the public or the citizens but to the government of another country.

chronology: 'I am sure you consider ....' really? you have never met me or spoken to me, but you are sure of what I consider. 'You have not read of his actions being opportunist' so that is the end of the debate, Filthy T has spoken, there is no world outside Filthy Ts reading material But let"s move on despite your delusional presumptions. The man has served his sentence and is now eligible for Parole.

SWlNE:
This is your statement:
? which 'Americans' are angry over Pollards release? Israili activists in the U.S. and Israel have long campained for Pollards freedom calling him a 'Marter' and his sentence 'savage' and unjust. Who knows.

A bit clear that you view Israeli activists (again, the same country he spied for) and Israel as the voice of the US population. What they say should've even be considered at this point seeing that they're the ones behind it and who benefited from stealing the sensitive information. You are not concerned on what persons from the US have to say?

Your next statement:
"You have not read of his actions being opportunist' so that is the end of the debate, Filthy T has spoken, there is no world outside Filthy Ts reading material"

I was being honest, if you have reputable sources for your statement then the simplest thing to do is to present it here. State your source and the name of the U.S Officials who see Pollard as "simply an opportunist selling valuable goods." Not a traitor who spied for another country but a simple merchant.

Your final statement:
"But let"s move on despite your delusional presumptions. The man has served his sentence and is now eligible for Parole."

He has not served his life sentence and the talks surrounding his release is nothing on his 'eligibility' but very plainly a political bargaining chip.

chronology: 'Political bargaining chip' which 'chip' would that be?

SWlNE:
Will you be providing the reputable sources for your statement and the name of the U.S Officials who see Pollard as "simply an opportunist selling valuable goods." Not a traitor who spied for another country but a simple merchant?

On your question 'what chip', reread the sentence.

davidk14: .

The big picture is that Israel is correct regarding the document the US signed with Iran.

The US administration sent a high level military commander to Israel after the deal was signed to calm them with promise of weapons to defend themselves and also threw in the spy as part of the calming deal. I would not be surprised if Israel told the US behind closed doors that they will absolutely attack Iran if they produce a bomb.

.

SWlNE:
You forgot to add:

"I believe that..."

davidk14: .

Whatever I right I believe. I say what I mean and mean what I say.

Don't you?

It's call integrity.

.

SWlNE: It's called an opinion. Everyone has it, it doesn't equate integrity.
Good to state that you're making a call that something is 'correct' based on it.
Your opinion is acknowledged.

davidk14: .

Opinion is different than fact. I stated fact. If you do not want to believe that I posted a fact, go fact check it. Find something that counters my fact. Then you can state whether or not I have posted a fact. It you do not believe I posted a fact....prove it. Until then, you only have an opinion and ya know what...everyone has one.



.

SWlNE:
Your opinion is acknowledged.

davidk14: .

When the US President says something...do you accept his words as fact or opinion?

.

SWlNE:
Think over your questions before you ask them.

Don't focus on bullshitting and on trying to get the response that you want, but instead focus on applying common sense to a question.

1) What does the US President have to do with you stating your opinion? -It is clear that on certain matters he will have more insight into the matter than you. All depends on the 'something' that is said.

2) What is the 'something' being said? -Is it that you view all the words coming from the US President is either fact (black) or opinion (white).

These two things should be considered. Stop lazily acting as if you're stupid.

yawaar: israel does not have balls to start another war..israel will only try to push US to war. We don't want another dead soldier from US because of maniac israel. we lost plenty in iraq, the war started by israel agents in neo cons.

davidk14: .

filth....You have no response to my question. But, I will ask it once more....

When the US President says something...do you accept his words as fact or opinion?

Simple question for a simple mind.

.

SWlNE: Davidk14 Correction: simple question from a simple mind.
I've responded to your question. Reread slowly and then again.


Yawaar and the US will try to bring in NATO. Western countries rarely contain their war.

davidk14: .

You need some schoolin child.

.

SWlNE: I responded to yours but you're not capable of responding to mine. Seems this will be one-sided, one-handed approach (similar to your wrinkled up sex life).

davidk14: .

That's exactly how I feel about your posts.

Amazing we agree to disagree.


_____


I ask a question and filth's response is, "...What does the US President have to do with you stating your opinion?"

Filth has a very basis failure regarding communicating.

All people have the right to have an opinion.

Opinions can and are based of true, hard facts yet opinions can and are also based of un-truths.

You assume my comments are not based on facts but based on un-truths.

If you do not believe my comments are based on truth, its your duty to provide documentation from reliable sources to contradict my comments and not discount my thoughts as 'comments' because you are too lazy to do the research.

Your response is from a 5th grade debating class.

SWlNE:
Let me explain it to you slower. I don't have much patience so pay attention:

This is your question: When the US President says something...do you accept his words as fact or opinion?

1) All that the US President says can not be placed as strictly 'fact' or 'opinion'. It will depend on what is stated. I repeat: It depends on what is fúcking being stated. Example he can say "Talking to Davidk14 is like talking to a child", he can also say, "We made a deal with Israel".

Your question is not thought-out and very misleading by using vagueness aka 'says something' and asking me if that 'something' is fact or opinion.

In certain matters the US President can state a fact, based on the information he will have or experience (and you as an individual will not be privy to).
He can also state an opinion based on what he have been told and made a personal judgement on.

YOU as an armchair chatter, reading some news clippings and stating that Israel is "CORRECT" is an opinion. You've read the limited online information and made that call. You're not privy to all that is occurring. Similar to persons stating Iran is "CORRECT".


Lastly, your opinion is noted and acknowledged. Now go take a nap.

davidk14: .

So....Filth said:

"...I don't have much patience..."

David responds:

Is that an opinion or a fact?

______________


Once again, you slip the question. Is what the president says, an opinion or a factual statement?

Reason I keep asking is because Filth has issues understanding what an opinion is and what is considered truthful statements.

So...one more time....

Is what the president says, is it an opinion or factual statement?

Filth has to make a choice....Either 'opinion' or 'factual statement'.

Reason?

To blindly state it is only an opinion when you do not agree with my statement or even the President, shows you are lazy to find out the truth.

So..... what's it gonna be Filth?

Oh...and why would anyone want to be associated with the word 'filth'? I know I wouldn't.

.

SWlNE:
What is the US President saying?

SWlNE: When you answer that above question, the point will get to you. (fingers crossed) I'm leading you to the water here.

davidk14: .

Ignorance is bliss for some.

Thanks for playin.

.