Free George Zimmerman (Page 3)

chimp0ut
chimp0ut: Maybe you should look up the definition of civil rights, because it doesn't apply to this case.
10 years ago Report
0
chimp0ut
chimp0ut: If a private citizen walks up and says, "Hey N-word, what are you doing out here, are you stealing stuff", it's not a "violation of civil rights". So under the worst case scenario possible, there is no civil rights factor in this case. I'm sure his questioning didn't exist of anything close to that either. Being "offended" is not legal justification to assault someone.

10 years ago Report
0
PartyHostile
PartyHostile: ok look..the trial happened, the verdict came in, but it doesnt like exhaust the legal options of his family and the issue of civil rights. we now have a position on the books, where like an unarmed teenager who committed no crime can be killed and the killer can say self-defense. that is totally dangerous and an atrocity, and it should be addressed. dude i think every american should be afraid that 'my child can do nothing wrong and be killed, and you can use self-defense, 'and tell 4 or 5 different stories that end up inconsistant, and still walk away.'
10 years ago Report
1
chimp0ut
chimp0ut: "we now have a position on the books, where like an unarmed teenager who committed no crime"

Why do you continuously make up lies to defend him? He committed a crime, it's called "assault". The witnesses and defense supported the fact that he attacked first.
10 years ago Report
0
chimp0ut
chimp0ut: Here's a lovely story how two black kids (age 17 & 14) walked up and shot a white woman's 13 month old baby in the face in a baby stroller. I guess that's not assault either? Hilarious how scumbag liberals don't even put it on the news. For any incident remotely resembling this Zimmerman case, there are literally a THOUSAND times more where the victim is white and perpetrator black:

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/22/us/georgia-baby-killed
10 years ago Report
0
PartyHostile
PartyHostile: chimp why the fuck do you keep bringing up shit about blacks killing whites? we are talking about the zimmerman case. that other shit is irrelevant. you obviously have something against black people. and by the way there are thousands of cases across the country where white officers have killed innocent black children. Trayvon's case just so happens to be high profile and all over the news.
10 years ago Report
0
chimp0ut
chimp0ut: "Trayvon's case just so happens to be high profile and all over the news."

Yes, it's HIGH PROFILE because there is no such thing as "the news". It's a propaganda outlet where everything is presented for a specific reason and the reason is not to inform you about anything.

There is an epidemic of black on white crime, 66 times more likely for a black to assault a white in 1994 than vice versa. Do you see the media cover this story? No. They fabricate a myth of white on black violence instead, just like what you're doing now.
10 years ago Report
1
chimp0ut
chimp0ut: Here's another one I'm sure you'll love/ignore. The 2008 rape statistics:

chimp0ut's Picture

Crimes committed at a 20,000:1 ratio (there wasn't even a 1 in the ratio but whatever) and you claim there is not an epidemic of black on white crime?
10 years ago Report
1
PartyHostile
PartyHostile: chimp, you also forget that there far more white people in the united states than black people, so your statistics mean nothing anyway.
10 years ago Report
0
chimp0ut
chimp0ut: No, it's not irrelevant, not even close when the crimes are at a 20,000 to 0 ratio for interracial rape.

Then you have black males between the age of 18-24 committing murder at TEN TIMES the rate of whites.

Blacks make up 13% of the US, yet are responsible for 49% of all murders and drastically over represented in all other violent crimes:

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-43

It is not "cultural" or "white people's fault". There are biological differences as well according to the mainstream scientific consensus:

"The bell curve for whites is centered roughly around IQ 100; the bell curve for American blacks roughly around 85; and those for different subgroups of Hispanics roughly midway between those for whites and blacks. The evidence is less definitive for exactly where above IQ 100 the bell curves for Jews and Asians are centered"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence

Then you have black males having 20% higher blood testosterone rate than whites according to prostate cancer research:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3455741

Do you think scientific facts like this do not contribute to it? Next you're going to probably claim that scientific facts are racist so we should ban reality and tell everyone lies instead.



10 years ago Report
1
davidk14
davidk14: .

Party...you do realize that Zimmerman is Hispanic.

.
10 years ago Report
0
chronology
chronology: Party, with respect, I cannot believe you Posted the above Post; 'an unarmed teenager who committed no crime can be gunned down'. Have you actually looked at the evidence in this case? It has been established by Professional Lawyers, CSI, Crime Scene Witnesses, Crime Scene Reconstruction, Cross Examination of Witness, that Martin 'beyond reasonable doubt' carried out a frenzied, sustained and brutal assault on George Zimmerman without reasonable cause. 'Beyond Reasonable doubt' is a Legal Term, only God knows the absolute truth of any situation, for human beings 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt' is our best shot. Why you are putting all this Spin on Martin is a mystery, there have been many young Black people, murdered (usually by other Black people) who we should remember.
10 years ago Report
0
davidk14
davidk14: Party,

You should really focus your concerns on this...

Chicago loses more black kids than soldiers in Iraq to gun violence
http://blackstarproject.org/action/?option=com_content&task=view&id=23&Itemid=3

...and you should also review this...

Is Baghdad Safer Than Chicago?
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1645301,00.html

..and this too...

THE SHOCKING DATA ON BLACK-ON-BLACK CRIME

A 2007 special report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, reveals that approximately 8,000 — and, in certain years, as many as 9,000 African Americans are murdered annually in the United States. This chilling figure is accompanied by another equally sobering fact, that 93% of these murders are in fact perpetrated by other blacks. The analysis, supported by FBI records, finds that in 2005 alone, for example, African Americans accounted for 49% of all homicide victims in the US — again, almost exclusively at the hands of other African Americans.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/04/09/race-wars-part-1-the-shocking-data-on-black-on-black-crime/


So....with this information...could you accept the possibility to have a possibility when reviewing your beliefs about the Zimmerman issue?

.

.
10 years ago Report
3
chimp0ut
chimp0ut: I would look more into the reasons why black crime in general is so high. There is no direct correlation between income and crime. Poor Asians commit crime at similar or lower rates than middle class whites. I already covered much of the reason why this happens in the last post.
10 years ago Report
2
ryan58581
ryan58581: it is sad knowing there are so many dumb people in the world you listen to emotions rather than facts and reason, ahem partyhostile but anyway..
if gorge Zimmerman was Racist he would not have saved a black family from a car wreck earlier, and he would not have five years earlier testify on behalf of a black man in court, not to mention gorge Zimmerman's great great grandfather was black, all this proves he was not racist,
P.S. skittles and water melon juice are both ingredients for a drug en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_drank
and travon martin was a known drug dealer and commited more crimes,
10 years ago Report
3
inzombia
inzombia: Thats bullshit ryan. I agree with Party 100%. And trayvon was not a drug dealer or a criminal. Just because hes black doesnt mean he was a drug dealer or a criminal.
10 years ago Report
0
ryan58581
ryan58581: no he has criminal records of selling drugs
10 years ago Report
0
duncan124
duncan124:
When I was in New York some one said that adults eating something like Skittles was a sign they were entering a bad mental state---I think caused by solvent abuse--and a Judge had said something like ' If he is eating those sweets he IS going to kill you '----I think he had also garbled the solvent part and said if you smell solvents and see these brightly coloured little things ' Then He Is Going to Kill You; you might also experience sudden black outs'.

New Yorks laws which protect you even if you have an object of public condemnation with you were claimed to be the only thing that saved a lot of people.
10 years ago Report
0
inzombia
inzombia: Ryan you are wrong. Skittles are not used to make drugs. The link you posted doesnt even mention skittles. So if i go to the store n buy skittles ima a drug dealer??? Dude give me an effin break. Also just because zimmerman claims to have a black great grandfather doesnt mean he cant be racist. Lots of white people have black relatives n are still racist.
10 years ago Report
0
davidk14
davidk14: .

Panda,

A little research shows....

From:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/07/was-treyvon-at-7-11-buying-skittles-and-fruit-juice-to-make-a-drug/



"....Trayvon, in fact, had become a devotee of the druggy concoction known as “Lean,” also known in southern hip-hop culture as “Sizzurp” and “Purple Drank.”

Lean consists of three basic ingredients — codeine, a soft drink, and candy.

If his Facebook postings are to be believed, Trayvon had been using Lean since at least June 2011.

See the entire article.

.
10 years ago Report
2
duncan124
duncan124:
' Lean ' as in some ones name I remember.
10 years ago Report
0
inzombia
inzombia: That doesnt prove he deserved to die though. You people think that attempting to demonize him will justify him being murdered n its not gonna work. "oh ok he was probably gonna get high so it was ok to kill him" LOL. Come on now. By they way im still not convinced that he bought skittles to make sizzurp because ive never heard of anyone using skittles for that. They usually use much harder candy.
10 years ago Report
1
duncan124
duncan124:
I think "at-7-11-buying" and " a soft drink" are the key words.

At one time buying a can of soft drink from a snack shop almost always resulted in a visit from the police.

Americans had talked themselves insane about the cost of a can of soft drink.

What is " attempting to demonize him" is the fact he might have failed to wash enough.

Doctors said the reason people were so mad about anyone buying soft drinks and vending machines was that they thought hey could still smell the water people used to wash with.
10 years ago Report
0
southern77
southern77: the law prevailed in this case...

I said it when this first happened that Zimmerman was not guilty and for some too think that martin wasn't the aggressor and somehow he was "murdered" shows how really ignorant some are of the law

try taking your emotions out of the case and you should see the true facts

btw while Al and Jessie KEEP BEATING THE RACE DRUMS (in hopes of being able to be relevant) the racial issues in America will never end... yet they wont say hardly a word about the three black boys who beat up a younger white boy... or the thrill kill of a white baseball player... or the two black boys who beat a WW 2 80 year old white man vet to death

one has to wonder which one of these 8 fine young lads will obama say looks like a son if he had one.... bet its not the white one
10 years ago Report
2
duncan124
duncan124:
Its hard to pin racism on any of the main issues.

In New York the Judges had admitted that they were responsible for the despair which caused some people who they had condemned to living in terrible inhuman housing to use solvents which then caused the complete slide in to drugs and mental health problems.

It was a string of bad decisions which really singled some people out as second class.

Then in a Southern state, more recently, a Judge said something like ' Well you know enough to know what they are like and know to stay away from them '...therefore the right to armed self defence was automatic.

However there are laws which say a jury has the right to see what the court has decided...so there are trials.
10 years ago Report
0