The Mechanical and the Conceptual Personalities junyabee: Considering that our education system is ‘geared’ to mold its captive universe as cogs for whatever manual or intellectual pigeon-hole in which they are to function, it is not a surprise that this topic exists. The mechanics can take whatever exists and deconstruct its components or aspects of a tangible or intangible system.. The conceptualizers are the generalist-dilettantes who can find the improvisations and tangents on the systems. The mechanics get into the weeds of the minutiae of the systems architecture and function. The conceptualists see the variations on the function. The mechanics increase the efficiency of the system. The conceptualist seek to expand the possibilities beyond the design. The mechanics improve the orthodoxy. The conceptualist become the heretics of the orthodoxy. Mundanely, the mechanics focus on the tangibly practical, while the conceptualist will stray into the intangible and improbable. The mechanics focus on tangible rewards, as the conceptualist are satisfied with the inspirations of the insights. The mechanics find satisfaction in pushing forward the efficiencies and conveniences within the system. The conceptualist are willing to deconstruct and revolutionarily re-form the system. By being willing to do this, the conceptualist become inherent antagonists with the system’s mechanics. Depending on the A or B of the personality of the conceptualist, it will determine the intensity of antagonism. junyabee: The mechanics become the advocates of conventionality and reform.. The conceptualist become the unconventional iconoclasts in the mechanics systems |