Science Thought Experiment #1 (Page 5) king saladin melon: science is really creepy . they cant even answer the question that confuse me . the question that i always think of . who can answer me " i don't wanna religious beliefs" who created us ? what will happen to me when i die? where the dead guys that i love or know go? do i will live another life ? are there people in other universes ? i always look at the stars and try to find the solution for these question but i cant . the universe is so so so wide . we live in an ambiguous world . king saladin melon: we just invent weapon to kill ppl. and dont think where those ppl go when they die and what happen to them after death . we have to think and find the answers CoIin: What happens when you die? Um, you just answered that yourself. Oh wait!  Perhaps what you mean is "What happens when I don't really die?"Science offers answers to a lot of important questions. Some people just don't like the answers. Do you want reality or stories? P.S. If you make it to heaven, would you mind asking if there are other heavens. I've always been curious. (Edited by CoIin) CoIin: Your question could be read in many different ways.... ( Q: Why do you rob banks? A: Coz that's where the money is ) But I think I know what you mean. The answer is dumb luck. You might not find that answer satisfying. If so, the raconteurs in the religion forum will happily regale you with 1001 different versions of why you are here. Under close scrutiny though, I'm afraid you'll find all their "explanations" to be contradictory of each other, and even self-contradictory in many cases. And don't expect them to adduce any evidence to suggest that their stories are anything more than just that - stories. How about a hug?   alpossmar82: Hey the wireclub science group. Wild met some phyician math guy, well not really met him heard alot stories and used astral travel to get a clear picture. A few possibilities. Hey I think there has to be consenting behaviour for astral travel to work. Yes anyway, these guys are creating a vortex using an element known as ........ has a close bonds to alluvial gold during extraction, radical stuff noway real Jetson stuff. I believe the vortex created is only a defense mechinism the rotation at a 90 degree creates some what of a DNA structure a cylinderal effect core of the vortex.. Defense against our understanding as humans and further knowledge in properties of atomic structure. Vortex being like the click contex concave mevement of an alluminum drunken can of beer. I making myself thirsty now, this kind of hypothenues. MAybe technology is disquising an evil plot, like how camoflarged lizards hunt an inferior prey. (Edited by alpossmar82)  OCD_OCD: Wow. I don't know what that was, but it was darn sure tortured. Especially the camoflarged lizards part..... alpossmar82: Invasion of the body snatches what a mater piece, Star Trek being more conservative are examples. Imagine inventing a teleport type of vortex and giving a doorway to human body snatches matching the DNA we duplicated for the vortex. I would prefer monsters rather than a human parasite. (Post deleted by alpossmar82 )  harlett anathema:  i can't fathom y anyone would believe lizards evolved into humanoid type intelligent life forces... regardless that all animal life on this planet evolved from out lemur's...  (Edited by harlett anathema) alpossmar82: Actually only a common ancestor of the lemur harLETT. Makes human behaviour more like rodent. alpossmar82: If you've seen the thermal imaging of the lizard highest density of water is located in the nostral like a cooling system. The actual colouring of a lizard the human colour spectrumn can't pick actual colour where its possible white. So is it the it possible the 2nd layering of skin deceives the human eyes as an external typology, an ancient trait of survival of the tera period. So is a real living dead creature? Downunder last human habitat therefore the native skink and Gecko have been prominent for European buyers, as a near extinct lizard by a feeding frenzy of nanoscientific research and collectors. Tech will sell higher than actual price of the lizard which is in itself worth heaps. alpossmar82: Now I can understand why William Shatner disses his Trekies. 60s when hair loss was cool.... (Post deleted by alpossmar82 )  ZeroApoc: Refering to the movement of the Earth relevant to the movement through time... Ideally time travel happens through singularities. That being said, you would have to select an end point. Problem solved. But...The earth isn't just moving around the sun. It is also moving through the galaxy. And the galaxy is also moving around the galactic cluster. And the GC is moving through whatever it is moving through. And so on and so forth. So we could be moving potentialy close to the speed of light in some fashion that has yet to be identified or explained.(so far as I know) So even if not near the speed of light, we coud still be moving much faster than 100,000+ miles per hour. But a singularity would still negate the problem of popping out in space...so long as we can map our movement in relation to a point in space that we have yet to actually locate. so I suppose we would end up in a random locaion(even in another galaxy  ) that would most likely kill us. Hopefuly quickly.  Corwin: But keep in mind, that there is a "fabric" to the Universe... it's not merely a big empty space with objects moving around within it at the whim of gravity... it is "space" itself that is also moving. Einstein stated, "Matter tells space how to curve, and space tells matter how to move." So as we sit in our chairs, seemingly stationary, we are most decidedly moving at some tremendous velocity relative to some other body in the Universe... but could we also not possibly be truly stationary in a sense, existing in a point of space-time that is in itself the thing that is in motion? If so, this "space" we currently occupy will travel forward through space and time according to the curvature of space and whatever other forces are acted upon it, regardless of whether we are occupying it or not.... and so could not the time traveler end up in the same "location" if the location had followed him into the future along the same path that the time-traveler took, but in real-time instead of the accelerated time that the traveler would experience? (Have you ever read The Time Machine by H.G. Wells? ) PIWINK: Any vessel that speeds up your travel is time travel if you are talking about time and movement.If I blink in at grandmas, then I am not in my home time at that moment and I must use time to travel. Direction east or west will loose or gain you time as we use light in the process. So if a beam shines and you are not alive to see it, does time accure in your timeline? R. I. P. took a little nap only to awake in a new age and was still in the same spot. Was he only dreaming or which was real of time and space. Ever been broke down and late in your time line. Does it take two if you need the usage others time. By reading this, have I used your time or given of mine? If you can read faster than I can type , who gained and lost? I feel ahead even though I feel my behind from sitting to long of a time! alpossmar82: It it possible we are always working behind in time, focus on money your wrist watch and dating stuff like that fogs the mind with time and space being years to milliniums. For a time machine to work past must be adjacent to say a reasonable blink of the human eye like a count not including 0. Present time being count 1 is a remainder of a simultaneous infrastructure of a human evolution, each living dying soul on earth must have an influence on the next second. Maybe we should calculate time as perpendicular to the last second at virtual length not yet theorised. Predicting the contours of an unknown planet without telescopes is a giant step, like doing math without a calculator. Imagine the unknown resources. | Science Chat Room 1 Person Chatting Similar Conversations |
