Y**** homepage / McDonalds

I was censored once again on y**** for this comment about the story about an angry McDonalds Corportation. Boo hoo. This isn't the first time my comments have been refused, but ever since Microsoft got their hooks into y**** it has gotten worse. Microsoft the CNN of the computer world. Has anyone else had this problem with Y****?

Wow that took a long for a rebutal from McD's. I seen that e-mail 6 months ago. I guess their lawyers are making their money. Damn trouser stains. There is nothing wrong with Alberta beef, but McD's has to use it instead of using that slurry they serve the good people of Canada. I stopped eating McGoopie's. The food you rent.

I know one thing that Y**** got rid of was Geocities.
You can only access material from Geocities now if it has been "archived".

Read your terms and agreements that you agreed to- anything you put on their servers(and the same is true with Wireclub, and literally everywhere on the net) becomes property of Y****, to leave alone, edit, or delete as they see fit.

If you don't want to be censored, buy your own webspace

I notice Ronald Lipton McDonald is here from the McPolice.

Its funny how you pop up as soon as there is a reference made about McDonalds???

You obviously dont care about freedom of speech much do you.
Afterall you could blame the Hamburglar for taking it away.

So what about the $3 million that was stolen from McDonalds customers in Western Australia only last month???

Oh dont tell me.They never read the terms and conditions either...........

..."not only censored...but deleted also"...lol...

oooFRIES-WITH-THAT-EYEooo

>>>You obviously dont care about freedom of speech much do you.

Yes, I do. But we are not on public property. It isn't about freedom of speech- its about abidding by the agreements you accepted as part of the allowed usage of their website. You agreed to this to be --here--, at Wireclubs fourms;

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"USER AGREEMENT

This Agreement constitutes your agreement with Wireclub with respect to your use of the Service. You must agree to abide by all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement in order to become or remain an user of the Service.

RIGHT TO USE

Your right to use the Service is subject to any limitations, conditions and restrictions established by us from time to time, in our sole discretion. We may alter, suspend or discontinue any aspect of the Service at any time, including the availability of any Service feature, database or content. We may also impose limits on certain features and aspects of the Service or restrict your access to parts or all of the Service without notice or liability.

...

REMOVAL OF INFORMATION

While we do not and cannot review every message or other material posted or sent by users of the Service, and are not responsible for any content of these messages or materials, we reserve the right, but are not obligated, to delete, move, or edit messages or materials, including without limitation profiles, public postings and messages, that we, in our sole discretion, deem to violate the Code of Conduct set out above or any other applicable content guidelines, or to be otherwise unacceptable. You shall remain solely responsible for the content of profiles, public postings, messages and other materials you may upload to the Service or users of the Service.

TERMINATION OF ACCESS TO SERVICE

We may, in our sole discretion, terminate or suspend your access to all or part of the Service at any time, with or without notice, for any reason, including, without limitation, breach of this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any fraudulent, abusive, or otherwise illegal activity, or that may otherwise affect the enjoyment of the Service or the Internet by others may be grounds for termination of your access to all or part of the Service at our sole discretion, and you may be referred to appropriate law enforcement agencies.

~Wireclub Link: Other/Terms.aspx "

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

These are the rules you agreed to to be here. If you disagree with these rules, you have no right to be here at all. I cannot make this anymore clear- just as I am not allowed the right to bust down your door and have a chat in your property against your will, neither are you allowed to force your way into a forum and soapbox. You are, however, able to create your own forum. Run it however you please- and there are many, many, many places like that.Y****- is not like that.

And thats THEIR right.Just because your passionate doesn't mean you may have rights over others.

So what about those McDonalds customers in Western Australia???

I dont think they were too passionate about being ripped off $3 million???

I honestly do not know what you're talking about.

Dont come the raw Mcprawn with me.

I hear the figure has gone up.

Its now $4 million stolen.

Hmmm....Google gave me this;

~~~~

AUSTRALIA's largest fast food chain will overhaul security on its EFTPOS machines after customers were fleeced out of $4 million.

The Daily Telegraph can reveal the McDonald's overhaul -- which will include its NSW stores -- comes amid police warnings retailers must be more vigilant in maintaining EFTPOS security.

Criminals snatched EFTPOS devices at McDonald's outlets across Perth and replaced them with bogus card-skimming versions, fleecing at least 3500 customers.

McDonald's spokeswoman Christine Mullen said the company will implement "a number of measures across the country to protect (EFTPOS) security''.

Ms Mullen admitted the scam was "very much a concern'', but declined to reveal new security measures.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/m-atm-fraud-at-mcdonalds/story-e6frgan**************1

~~~~~~~~~~

Is this what yer talking about? Because, while the conartists targeted McDonalds, it could easily have been perpetrated at any store, be it McDonalds, Burger King, or a Mom and Pop store that offers debit.

Saying McDonalds is at fault seems very odd, since they do not own, nor hold any patents, as far as I know, to the debit technology. Unless I'm missing a part of the story, which I could be since this is the first I'm hearing of this, I don't see how this could be considered McDonalds fault at all, other than the fact that their employees should have been more attentive.

Again, though, when I was discussing passion, it was on the issue of rights- I wasn't discussing con-artists and how people feel about them.